Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov: Westphalia, Soft Power, And New…[Part 3]

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D.
March 30, 2017

I have to apologize for devoting much of this weeks blogs to the remarks of Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, but as I indicated in part one, so many people sent the transcription of his remarks to the Military Academy of the Russian General Staff, reported on The Sakers website, that I had to comment. And certainly his remarks warrant the extended treatment, for they outline the salient feature of the Russian states political worldview and mentality in a way that few remarks from Russian leaders have. They deserve careful consideration and reflection, for the implications of Mr. Lavrovs remarks are both broad and deep, and very long-term oriented. (I hope, eventually, to do a webinar in the members area on the Russian cosmist philosophers as part of the culture webinars series, for it is in that body of work from the Russian intelligentsia that one sees clearly how closely allied culture and politics are in contemporary Russian thinking.)

In part one, I reviewed the implications of Mr. Lavrovs extended references to the Peace of Westphalia, implications that spell out certain long term objectives of Russian foreign policy. Yesterday in part two, I reviewed the soft power/culture power connection of Russia’s foreign policy to that first Westphalian emphasis. Today I would like to focus on the third area: nuclear weapons and new non-nuclear strategic weapons. Here’s the link to the article once again:

Speech of Lavrov at the Military Academy of the General Staff

I want to direct your attention today toward the end of Mr. Lavrovs remarks, and to some truly astonishing implications contained in them:

Recently, there has been a push towards forcing the nuclear states to abandon their nuclear arsenals and banning nuclear weapons altogether. It is crystal clear that this is premature. Let me remind you that it wasn’t for nothing that the parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty wrote into it that the nuclear arsenals had to be fully scrapped but only in the context of general and complete disarmament. We are prepared to discuss the possibility of further gradual reductions in nuclear capabilities but only if we take all the factors influencing strategic stability into account and not just the quantity of strategic offensive weapons.

Another reason why we’re prepared to discuss this issue is the growing sense of urgency about making this process multilateral. The restrictions on nuclear capabilities which Russia and the United States have repeatedly accepted for many years have led them to a situation where, essentially, they cannot proceed doing this on the bilateral basis. (Emphasis added)

A little further on, Mr. Lavrov adds this:

The formation of a polycentric international order is an objective process. It is in our common interest to make it more stable and predictable. In these conditions, the role of diplomacy as a tool to coordinate balanced solutions in politics, economics, finance, the environment, and the innovation and technology sectors has increased significantly. Simultaneously, the role of the armed forces as the guarantor of peace has increased too.

Observe that these two statements are the logical implications of the whole soft power culture power Westphalian emphasis; in effect, Mr. Lavrov has stated that the old Cold War conceptions of armaments reduction talks – with their emphasis on bean counting the number of tanks, warheads, missiles, aircraft  – is simply no longer viable, for the other components of stability are cultural in nature, and lest one misunderstands his statements, he spells out what culture in this context means: it means the whole constellation of domestic and international political institutions, historical memory and traditions, finance and economics, technological innovation and so on.

Mr. Lavrov is correct here, for it is that constellation of factors that leads to the development of armaments and more importantly, the circumstances in which they are used. This brings us to remarks that Mr. Lavrov made in response to a question, and these are worth pondering long and hard:

To a very large extent, President Trump’s position on the majority of key issues on the foreign policy agenda, including further steps to limit strategic nuclear weapons as you’ve mentioned, has yet to be finalised. By the way, if I remember right, Donald Trump mentioned the issue of cooperation with us in this field as an example. He was asked whether he would be prepared to lift sanctions on Russia. I believe that was the way the question was formulated. He responded by saying they should see if there were issues on which they could cooperate with Russia on a mutually beneficial basis in US interests, in particular, mentioning nuclear arms control. At the same time, as you know, the US president said the Americans should modernise and build up their nuclear triad. We need to wait until the military budget is finally approved under the new administration and see what its priorities and objectives are and how these funds will be spent. As for our further conversation, I briefly mentioned in my address that we are ready for such a conversation but it should be conducted with acknowledgment of all strategic stability factors without exception. Today, those who propose implementing the so-called nuclear zero initiative as soon as possible, banning and destroying nuclear weapons and generally outlawing them absolutely, ignore the fact that since the nuclear bomb was made and this new kind of weapon began to be produced on a large scale in the USSR, the US, China, France and the UK, colossal changes have taken place in military science and technology. What is being developed in the US under the codename Prompt Global Strike are non-nuclear strategic weapons. If they are developed (and this work is moving forward very actively, with the objective of reaching any point in the world within an hour), of course, they will be more humane than nuclear weapons, because there will be no radiation, no Hiroshima or Nagasaki effect. However, in terms of military superiority, my friends at the Defence Ministry tell me the effect will be more devastating than from a modern nuclear bomb. (Emphasis added)

Note again that Mr. Lavrov has stated the Cold War Bean counting method of armaments limitations talks is not workable without a discussion and agreement on all factors – again the culture factor – are had.  Note also that in his remarks Lavrov has ruled out nuclear disarmament, even on a bilateral US-Russia basis, since (1) there are other nuclear powers, but more importantly because (2) there is a whole class of non-nuclear strategic weapons, equally destructive as nuclear weapons for bombardment purposes.

For those familiar with it, this is similar to the position that former US Army Lt. Col Tom Bearden maintains was a negotiating position of the former Soviet Union in arms negotiations, namely, that they wanted to ban weapons even more destructive than nuclear weapons, because of their sheer destructive power. The American negotiators, Bearden maintains, did not have a clue what the Russians were then talking about.

This is a crucial factor, for what it indicates is that Russia is well aware of a whole class of secret weaponizable technologies -again, alluded to by Lavrov in his previous remarks – that have to be taken into consideration. In this specific instance, Mr. Lavrov is possibly referring to the rod of God kinetic space-based orbital bombardment technologies which literally propel an inert projectile at such extreme velocities to a surface target that the impact yields a colossal thermonuclear-sized explosion, but without any radioactive aftereffects. In short, think of a nuclear war, without radioactivity.

Wars are thinkable again, and this is a de-stabilizing factor. This could also indicate that, at present, Russia is not involved in the development of a similar capability, but that if such weapons are not up for negotiation with western powers, then it will perforce have to develop them. (And there is an important side issue here, for two powers – Germany and Japan – have undertaken not to develop thermonuclear or nuclear strategic weapons, which they could easily and very quickly do. Such technologies afford an end-run around their treaty obligations, and since both are space-faring powers as well, this potentiality exists, and is yet another de-stablizing factor in Russias strategic calculations).

If one parses Mr. Lavrovs concerns here closely, it is almost as if he is stating, as openly as he can, that negotiations on nuclear weapons is almost a moot point, since technological developments is quickly rendering them obsolescent if not obsolete. Its the secret stuff that Russia is (rightly) concerned about, and it’s the secret stuff that also is a de-stablizing factor and needs to be put on the table. If one now takes the concerns of all three parts of this blog together, then what at first might appear to be a kind of random grab bag of unrelated concerns is really a well-thought out connected policy. And that policy is one which, at its central core, is uniquely based in cultural concerns. And in this, in my opinion, its light years ahead of the create a crisis and then solve it approach of the West.

Read More At: GizaDeathStar.com
________________________________________________

About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Advertisements

[Secret Space Program 2015] – Dr. Joseph P. Farrell – Cosmic War & Cosmic Versailles [Presentation 1]

TheBreakaway
Zy Marquiez
June 16, 2016

During this previous Secret Space Program Conference held last year in Bastrop, Texas, was able to meet Dr. Joseph P. Farrell and personally thank him for all the work he has done.  His work has been quite pivotal in bringing many newfound ideas to the fold.  Ideas that are utterly needed to be able to grasp the intricacy of the landscape that the global populace finds itself currently in.

Farrell is a highly renown scholar, and the author of many highly fascinating books, such as The Third Way – The Nazi International, European Union, Fascism published last year, as well as his latest book, Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, And Secret Sorcery: The Fascist International, 9/11 & Penetrated Operations.

In any case, this particular presentation, which is the first of a two-part series, is titled Cosmic War – Cosmic Versailles.

Farrell begins by introducing the outline of his presentation and giving a brief presentation of each.  This includes:

I.  A Look Back – San Mateo 2014 – The-War Mega-Manhattan Project On Steroids
II.  The Historical Context
III.  The Mythological Context
IV.  The Implications For The National Security-Breakaway Civilization/Secret Space program Complex .

As he alludes, the whole point of everything that is going on behind the scenes with the ones running the Breakaway Civilization is to ‘avoid a Tower of Babel’ moment.  “A repetition of things that may have happened in the distant past.  And in that respect i also suggested that they would go back and look at the ancient texts to see if there was any guidance.  To see if there was something in those texts that might be possible to formulate their policies.  And in this respect, the parallels between WWI and what I am calling the Cosmic Versailles are truly astonishing.”

Farrell thence proceeds with his main thesis, which is “that the post Cosmic War period…I believe that there was an ancient Cosmic War fought right here in our Solar System.  And that this may have created a Versailles treaty situation…that’s what we’re going to be examining today.”  [For those interested in learning more about the Cosmic War, please refer to his book which outlines this idea in incredible detail.]

Transitioning into the first major part of his outline, Farrell hones in on the next part of his presentation, which focuses on the multi-faceted threat of the Communists, the post-war Nazis, and UFOs.

This trifecta of power, “would have forced them to create a Manhattan Project on steroids lasting several decades.  But with immediate need to develop technologies, reconnaissance technologies potentially able to scout out and find out what the Soviet Bloc was up too, find out where the Nazis were and what they were up too, that’s a big part of my work.  And then finally not only to do this but secondly to introduce a program designed to deal with the problem posed by UFOs, and to institute a long range black projects technological research program to emulate the performance characteristics of UFOs if possible, and achieve parity, or near parity.  And you’re going to be hearing I’m quite certain from Dr. Paul LaViolette, one of my favorite researchers in this field about some of these technologies.”

Farrell continues “This implies, that the National Security establishment had concluded as their trying to achieve parity that UFOs as I indicated last year, pose a potential National Security threat, because much of UFO activity was concentrated over American and Soviet defense installations…Last year I indicated at a Soviet Nuclear ICBM base…at Byelokoroviche in the Ukraine UFOs actually activated the launch sequence of soviet ICBMs leaving Soviet crews scrambling to shut this down and prevent a thermonuclear war.”  [Emphasis added]

Due to all of the above, and couple with much of what was covered last year by Farrell, “the national security state a study of ancient religious mythological texts and lore for the purposes and seeing i they can determine who was behind the UFOs.  Secondly, if possible, where they were from.  Thirdly, what they wanted.  Fourthly, what their motivations were.  Were they hostile?”

Farrell states that at minimum, much of what was going on behind the scenes would have to have been seen as a “provocative act” by the Breakaway Complex.  This would very much spawn an enormous drive to achieve parity, or near parity, as quickly as possible.  A coupled concern to that is spoken thence by Farrell, which is that “If that’s the case, than they need to determine whether or not psychological warfare operations can be mounted against them.”

Proceeding to delineate the possible importance of this, Farrell points out that “…if there is a Cosmic Versailles, if there is some treaty that you might be able to find traces of in ancient texts, in ancient lore, then they need to know the terms of that treaty.  Is it still in effect?  What happens if its violated?”  Ultimately, “their goal [The Breakaway Complex’s] was to prevent  a second interference, a second tower of Babel moment in human history.”

Rewinding a bit, Farrell thence mentions that the possibility of why UFOs began appearing in large numbers “at the beginning of the human nuclear and thermonuclear era was possibly because the nuclear bomb, per the observations of Nazi scientist Dr. Ronald Richter in Argentina, may have been functioning as “transducers” of energies from the configuration of local space-time…That is to say from the positions of the planets and so on when and where on the surface of the Earth the bomb is set off.  …For a brief moment it functions as a gateway, as a “transducer” of the zero point energy as it is configured in local space.”

Farrell’s thesis follows:

“I’ve suggested, in many interviews, that there is a direct analogy between the post-World War One settlement between the Allied and Associated Powers and the Central Powers, and that ancient Cosmic War that I believe to have been fought by the “gods” within our own solar system.  But I have left my detailed reasons for making this observation largely unstated.  So you’re going to hear them here for the first time.”

Transitioning into the next part of his presentation, Farrell tackles an unexpected, and yet, still incisive point, which is that of artillery [during the world wars?], and its historical context with this abstruse issue.

“About 100 years and a few months ago…this man August von Mackensen…in the month of April of 1915, launched what was supposed to have been a limited offensive in Tarnów, Gorlice…to help relieve the Russian pressure on Germany’s Austro-Hungarian allies.  But what happened was that his offensive was so successful, and so brutal, that the Russian lines began to collapse to the point that Germany decided to go on a front wide offensive in 1915.  It nearly led to the complete collapse and exit of Russia from the war.”

Farrell continues:  “…what made all that possible was this man right here, this is Lt. Colonel Georg Bruchmueller [Operation Michael: the “Kaiserschlacht” March 1918 The roar was heard in Paris]…we all heard the history books of how on the Western front the allies and Germans bombarded each other for weeks on end with artillery to create breakthroughs supposedly in the trench system.  This man changed the tactics completely…he believed in sudden massive coordinated artillery, infantry, cavalry movements, with time tables…but by 1918 these tactics were then applied on the final German offensive in March of 1918, beginning with the “Kaiserschlacht” the first German offensive…after the Germans surrendered to the central powers.  On such a narrow front this man concentrated over 6,000 artillery tubes on a front of about 25 miles against the British lines.  And in a 5 hour bombardment hurled more ordnance on British lines then we dropped on Nazi Germany in all of WWII…of course it sent the British reeling.  The roar was so bad from that intense 5-hour bombardment it could be heard 60 miles away in Paris.”   [Emphasis added]

Why is all of this important?   Farrell elucidates:  “It’s because when we get to Versailles, something happens.  And its precisely these six points that indicate to me that there may have been a Cosmic Versailles at the end of that Cosmic War in distances of high antiquity.  The six crucial points are these”

1.  The “Family Feud “that was WWI was over.

For consider, Kaiser Wilhelm II was the cousin of King George of the United Kingdom.”
2.  Reparations – Tribute and Sacrifice

“Versailles, stipulated massive war reparations.  Germany had to pay war reparations to the allies.  And I want you t think of this in terms borrowing the insights of Secretary Fitts…I want you to think of this in terms of a tithe.  Or of the ancient practice of tribute to a conquering king and so massive were the reparations on the Germans that what you were really doing is that your harvesting their National Wealth and productivity of each and every last living individual German.  So in a certain sense its even sacrifice.”

3.  Inventorying and Disarmament: the forbidding of certain types of weapons.

“What did the allied and associated powers do?  First of all, they took an inventory, they’ve just suffered 4 years of war, and in the final year of the war these massive German offensives with numbers of artillery that boggle the mind of all calibers of all calibers…First thing the allies do is they inventory the German war machine and stipulate in the disarmament clauses of the treaty that the German Reich would be prohibited from the manufacture of certain types of weapons.  And if you stop to think about this if you’ve read my book, the Cosmic War, I put in that book the entire Epic of Ninurta – an ancient Mesopotamian text – and I did that for a very specific reason.  Because when you read this text its hardly an epic.  It’s like reading the index of a Sears catalog.  It’s simply an inventory, and most interestingly this is an epic about actions being taken after a war of the Gods. And the inventory is an inventory of the weapons that were used to fight this war.  And some of that technology was taken by the victors and used and applied in other context.  Some of the technology was destroyed.  And a very small category of that technology that could not be destroyed was hidden.”  [Emphasis added]

4.  Monitoring

“As a part of the stipulations of the treaty, the Versailles system set up a system of monitoring to ensure German compliance with the treaty.  In other words, you don’t rely on the enemy that you just defeated to tell you “Oh no we’re not building any of that”…you set up a system of monitoring and this has both a public, and a secret aspect because the French of course insisted in the treaty that they be able to send their attachés and representatives to all the German heavy industries plants and inspect them to make sure that the Germans weren’t producing any heavy armaments that they had the bitter experience of facing.  But this also means, that they set up a system of spies and i want you to file that one in the back of your mind, because that is going to be a very crucial point.

5.  The “Quarantine”: Demilitarization Of The Rhineland

They set up a quarantine zone around Germany and insisted, and this is one of the quarantine zones [Farrell points to the screen, to the Rhineland map].  That extended to a zone as you can see of about 30 kilometers on the East bank of the Rhine…That whole area was demilitarized, it was a quarantine zone…  Incidentally they set up another one on the eastern side of Germany in a very different way.  And I want you to file that one in the back of your mind.”

6.  The Survival Of Both Parties

“The most significant point – WWI was really sort of Act 1, as we know, in a great world war that the world fought from 1914, to 1945.  And WWI ended more or less as a stalemate…Now if the National Security Establishment is formed in this crucible this is the way they’re going to look at things.  They’re going to look at recent human history WWI/WW2 and apply this Versailles text to the reading of ancient text, to the reading of ancient mythology.”

From here Farrell gives a small synopsis of what WWI was:

1.  The First World War was a family feud between related monarchs: Edward VII of Great Britain [who did so much to engineer the war], was the son of Queen Victoria, and hence, the uncle of Kaiser Wilhelm II, whose mother was Victoria’s daughter, which makes him a cousin to Tsar Nicholas via Tsarina Alexandra other family ties.

Farrell continues, “When you look back and look at the ancient Mesopotamian text in particular that refer to this “Cosmic War”, what you see is a war fought among the gods..they are all related to each other.   It’s a big family feud – it’s a big civil war.”

1.  The “Cosmic War” was a family feud between related “gods”, the most famous example being Mesopotamian and Greek mythology, with the war between Tiamat and Marduk, later between Nergal [Mars], Ninurta, Enki, et al. [since they’re all descended from Tiamat], or the war between Chronos [Saturn], the Titans, and Zeus.

Farrell further expounds, “The Greeks have their version of this, the Romans have their version of this, the Aztecs have a version of this, the Vedas have their versions of this, the bible – Lucifer, Michael, The War In Heaven.  Everybody has a version of this “Cosmic War”.

Moving onto the Mythological Context, Farrell points out in a slide as he comments about:

In the Versailles Matrix: Pay reparations, or be subject to the invasion and occupation of the industrial region [i.e., ruination of your economy] and the forcible extraction of tribute: The Ruhr 1923.

The Sacrifice Matrix:  Pay the sacrifice or be subject to retribution and bad crops [i.e. the forcible ruination of your economy]

“If you look at the ancient practice, what’s sacrifice?  Pay the tribute, pay the sacrifice, or be subject to military occupation, deportation…Or make your sacrifice, make your animal sacrifice, your human sacrifice, and if you don’t, you’ll have bad crops.  Now I want to stress something that’s very important, if you look at most of these ancient texts and traditions, sacrifice begins to rise, begins to become an acceptable practice, after some sort of war.”
Farrell follows with this intriguing quotation:

“The Toltecs were engaged [in battle] at a place call Netlalpan.  And when they had taken captives, human sacrifice also got started…Indeed, every kind of human sacrifice got started then…It was the devils who started them…Huemec sacrificed a human streamer, thus making payment.”  [Emphasis Added] [Note: By payment Farrell equates that to a reparation].
History and Mythology Of The Azecs – The Codex Chimalpopoca, trans. from the Nahuatl by John Biehorst, p. 118, cited in Grid Of The Gods, p. 208

Is there more?  Farrell sheds light on this:

“Note what we have, in just the Aztec tradition alone, just as we have incidentally in the western Christian tradition, the idea of:

1.  A Primordial war or conflict followed by
2.  The institution of bloody sacrifice to maintain the broken order and to stave off economic collapse by payment of a “debt”.  It’s a tithe, it’s a tribute, it’s a way of symbolizing that you won the wealth and labor of an entire civilization, because they are defeated in war.”

Traveling further into the past, Farrell further expounds:

“Sacrifice is also viewed as an analogue to the “dismemberment” that you see in some cosmological and metaphysical processes of the differentiation in some cultures that leads to creation.  In the Vedic texts, this whole process of differentiation, that creates all the fullness, and diversity, that you and I know and experience in everyday life.  This is described in the Vedic texts as “dismemberment”…In some cultures this idea of sacrifice expresses itself how?  Linda Howe has done yeomen’s work studying the phenomenon of cattle mutilations.  And even in some cases human mutilation.  What is this for? This might be a component, of the institution, of some sort of reparations clause in some far distant treaty of Versailles.”

Farrell then proceeds with another comparison to Versailles in a slide:

“The treaty of Versailles demanded that Germany turn over copies of its big road mobile 16.8 “Big Bertha” siege guns, and demanded that Germany also turn over a copy of “the Paris Gun”.  The Germans refused to do the latter, claiming they had destroyed all copies of the gun and any papers and plans detailing it.  Suspiciously, they also passed a law making it the highest state secret, forbidding those with knowledge of it to talk about it.  The Allies, for their part,

1.  Carted off what weapons they could;
2.  studied them and made use of the technology both in military and other applications, and
3.  destroyed as much of the “really nasty” stuff as they could find, and ordered the Germans not to build any more of it.”

“Why did I put that in there [picture of the Paris gun]?” Farrell inquires, thus continuing, “because the projectiles from that weapon were the first man-made objects in lower outer space.  It shot up into the stratosphere, and that’s how it was able to achieve long range.”

Not surprisingly, in WWII, Farrell points out, that the Germans proceeded to bring forth the Krupp 21cm K12E/Krupp 28cm K5E weapons, essentially showing that they never did get rid of the previous “Paris Gun” blue prints.

Hearkening back to Mesopotamia, Farrell delves deeper into the Epic Of Ninurta, which “indicates a similar if not identical pattern of the inventorying, destruction, and secreting of technology, for in The Cosmic War, I cite the “epic” at length [pp. 222-227], in which I pointed out that the “epic” is really an inventory of the technology – consisting of various “stones” – of the defeated enemy.  There were three classes of technology [stones]:

1.  Stones to be preserved and carried off by the victor for study and use in the other applications [pp. 227-229];
2.  Stones that were ordered to be smashed and pulverized [pp.230]; and finally;
3.  Stones that could not be destroyed:  One of these, the “Elel” stone, is spoken of this way in the Epic Of Ninurta:

[Note: in the text, the stones [such as Elel] are addressed directly, like you’re talking directly to them.]

“Elel, intelligently you caused terror of me to descend on the Mountains [which can also mean planet, and pyramid], where discord had broken out.  In the rebel lands you proclaimed my name among my people who had banded together.  Nothing of your wholeness shall be diminished.  It shall be greatly suited to the clash of weapons…You shall be set up on a pedestal in my great courtyard.”

In other words, the implication is that the Elel stone is a kind of “philosopher’s stone” of Weapons technologies, an “ultimate weapon”, and since it could not be destroyed, it was hidden.”  [Italic emphasis in original]

Farrell follows with another slide:

“The Versailles Treaty stipulated that allied [and particularly French] military attaches would have access, at any time, and unannounced, to all German heavy industry and armaments plants for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the Treaty.  Additionally, the French put into place an expanded on the ground human intelligence capability to spy on German compliance.  [Germany, incidentally, as I detail in The Third Way: The Nazi International, The European Union, and Corporate Fascism, developed the policy of using German firms in proxy nations to develop forbidden military technologies, a lesson with its own implications for the “cosmic war” scenario.]
In short, there had to be a system to ensure treaty compliance, a system of espionage, or…”

Transitioning to another slide, Farrell couples the above former with the following:

…”Watchers.”  The Slavonic text of the Book Of The Secrets Of Enoch, ch. 18: 1-3 states:

“The men took and brought me up into the fifth heaven [what does this numbering of heaven really mean?], and I saw there many hosts not to be counted called Grigori; and their appearance, was like men, and their size was greater than that of the giantsAnd their countenances were withered, and their lips are always silent.” [pp. 20-21] [Italic emphasis in original, bold emphasis added.]

Continuing:

“In the footnote to this passage, however, Morfill and Charles not that the “Grigori” is another name for the “Watchers,” that class of humanoid beings whose duty was to “watch’ and if necessary guide [that is to say, interfere with] humanity.”  [Q: Why was it necessary to watch and guide humanity?]

“The answer may be that in the aftermath of a Cosmic War, and incidentally in my view it may have included the destruction of an entire planet, a la Star Wars, is what you would do.  You destroy the inventory and technology that made such a war and the destruction of such a planet possible, number one.  And number two, you’d prohibit the development of that technology again.  And number three, you would muddle the science to prevent humanity from achieving that kind of technological prowess again, and misapply it.  And you’d try and mold and direct human affairs.” [Bold emphasis added]

“Morfill and Charles also state:

“The text cannot mean that all the watchers rebelled, but only that it was from the class of watchers that the rebels proceeded.”  [Note that you now have two post-cosmic-war elites: a “good” one and a “bad” one, both on near planet Earth, watching and manipulating humanity.]  “It is of course, just possible that the writers’ scheme may differ from the conception we have given above ,and be as follows:

“The rebellious watcers, with their prince Satanail, are confined to the fifth heaven.  The subordinate angels who followed them are imprisoned in the second heaven, where as the watchers who went down to earth and sinned with women are imprisoned under the earth.” [p. 20-22, n. on “the fifth heaven.”  [Italic emphasis in the original]

In other words, we have a quarantine zone around, and to some extent, inclusive of, the Earth, again in a kind of “cosmic Versailles” template.”

Farrell follows with another tidbit of info by Morfill and Charles,”…that it was “Under the sphere [i.e. within the orbit of] the moon, which is the least under all, is a firmament…and there the souls of the demons are.” [p. 36, n.]  “Conversely, they also note that pagan tradition reversed not the place, but the mortal status, of this zone, by noting that for the Stoics, the above of the blessed was “under the moon,” citing the early Christian writer Tertullian’s De Anima, ch. 54. [p. 36, n.]”

From here, Farrell sinks his teeth into this abstruse issue further:

“Note now what we have:

1.  A clear reference to a “quarantine” zone, which is defined by,
2.  A clear defined astronomical (and hence identifiable) natural boundary in space, one that is moreover
3.  A natural base of operations for anyone intent upon the long-term observation of humanity and planet Earth and its compliance with any “cosmic Versailles” treaty, and which being ready to hand,
4.  Might explain the sudden spike in UFO interest and interference in human nuclear and thermonuclear weapon systems during and after WWII; and finally,
5.  Clear indication that there are two surviving elites of this “cosmic war” both near and on planet Earth, and that human scholars are exemplified in Morfill and Charles are aware of this story.”

Ultimately [subsequent slide]: “what might all of this mean for the national security state / breakaway civilization studying such texts, and the parallels between them and modern history and UFO-associated phenomena?  What are the implications for a “secret space program”?

1.  The indications in some texts of a “quarantine” zone in local celestial space, a zone defined by clear astronomical boundaries such as the orbit of the Moon or any other local celestial body, may indicate that human presence in or beyond the zone could be interpreted as an act of war or a violation of the stipulation of some lost “cosmic Versailles” treaty. And thus, as a safeguard, it will be necessary to ensure that human presence in space is not misinterpreted.  This can be done by putting official notices on space probes, such as the Lunar Excursion Module of the Apollo program, that humanity is “coming in peace for all mankind:” [Italic emphasis in original]

Thereafter,  Farrell implores, “Who’s the message addressed to?  Why would they have suspected or insisted upon putting a message like that?  Was it just to put a monument up there on the moon?  Or was there another reason operative in placing these little notices on those early space probes?  What I’m suggesting is of course there was another reason for it.”  [Bold emphasis added]

[Next slide]

“2.  The Re-Militarization of the Rhineland/Quarantine Zone”: As international human commerce becomes increasingly reliant upon space-based assets for financial clearing and, in the not-too-distant future, space mining, it will be necessary and essential to protect those assets from any outside interference or prediction, human or otherwise, and this implies the basing of weapons in the “quarantine zone”.  This will in turn require, as I indicated at last year’s conference, demonstrations -space-gun-boat diplomacy – by humanity to “whomever” that it has acquired a rudimentary capability of engineering systems of planetary and possibly stellar scales [the “Farrell Corollaries to the Kardashev Classification system] for potential weaponization, and the achievement or parity or near-parity with the ability to emulate UFO technical performance.

“3.  These demonstrations might be intended to force a “renegotiation” of the “tribute/sacrifice” component of any “cosmic Versailles” as might have been put into place in High Antiquity, particularly since it will not be lost upon the technocrats and oligarchs of any such breakaway civilization/secret space program that with the advent of Christianity and its influence over a significant portion of the world, that the payments of sacrifice ceased completely [implying that sacrifices were simply seized and performed anyway by other intelligences, ala the Ruhr occupation of 1923].  This renegotiation might have taken the form of financial or commodities payment of some sort, a point which clear analytical implications for the current state of the global economy; [Italic emphasis in the original]

“4.  The clear implications of a “Cosmic Versailles” are also that (a) elites from both sides of the conflict survived; and (b) that the first stage of the conflict was over, leading to the possibility of a second and renewed stage in the future.  Given that the “Versailles” template or model dictates not only that some “quarantine” zone was instituted in local celestial space but also that some monitoring or espionage project was established in order to ensure compliance with that “treaty” [especially in the matters of reparations and non-development of certain technologies], any program of technological emulation of UFOs must be accompanied by a “counter-espionage” program to identify and mislead any “watchers”.  Such a program would depend on (a) a massive surveillance program and (b) the acquisition of a massive genome/DNA database to identify those with “non-Human” but humanoid genetic signatures, our “genetic cousins.” (Think “Ancestry.com” and other such sites) [Italic emphasis in the original, bold emphasis added]

Farrell gives us another tidbit to ponder, “In my book The Cosmic War, I recount this war from a lot of different ancient texts, there is something I began to notice about these ancient tablets of destiny, these ancient technologies of mass destruction.  I think they were biometrically activated.  You had to have the right retina scan.  You had to have the right DNA, otherwise they wouldn’t work.  That’s why only the ‘gods’ could possess them.  And if you suspect all that, and if you’re invading a bunch of middle eastern countries, to collect artifacts, not just oil, you’re going to start looking for it.  And the only way to do that is through a massive surveillance program coupled with biometric databases.  Guess what the FBI wants to do right now? ”

“5.  Since the ancient texts – particularly the Mesopotamian and Greek traditions – indicate a “cosmic war” in our own celestial neighborhood, with Nergal/Herrakles/Hercules/Aries[Mars], Chronos[Saturn], Tiamat (the mising exploded planet), the Moon, and the Sun being involved, the possibility exists that remnants of the technology – including those weapons technologies such as the “Elel” stone of the Epic Of Ninurta – might rest or be recoverable on those planets.  As such, which the public message placards on human space probes might indicate “we come in peace”, the possibility exists that a covert purpose for the exploration of those bodies and for the recovery and analysis of those alleged ancient military technologies is in play.

Finalizing, the final slide follows:

“I believe that it is evident from the behavior of technocrats concerned with monitoring space an UFO affairs, from the concern to secure human thermonuclear weapon systems and space systems against UFO interference, to the indicators of the development of hidden technologies and energy systems [Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion by Paul LaViolette Ph.D. is as far as I’m concerned the textbook on the thinking and technologies that are out there in the public record], to the development of a massive surveillance state, rapid on-the-spot DNA sequencing technologies, to the sending of message on human space probes reassuring “whomever” of our peaceful intentions, that it becomes clear that such patters and policies themselves corroborate the possible existence of the “Versailles model” as a template for policy-makers of the breakaway civilization/national security group and that this template has indeed informed and influenced the behavior of that group, especially as regards to the possibility of covert “space exploration and rearmaments program.”

And that my friends, is not all she wrote.

The plot thickens quickens.

The Pentagon Wants Reusable Space Plane At Top Of Budget

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
March 10, 2016

This story is important in the context of the story about the successful testing of high energy laser sublimation of basalt a couple of days ago, a proof of concept experiment necessary if the plans to build an asteroid-zapping weapons platform ever is to see the light of day.

You’ll recall, though, that in the blog the principal problem to be overcome was not the concept but the scale. To zap asteroids with lasers (or for that matter masers or grasers) is to have a sufficient scale in order to zap small to medium sized asteroids, and that requires a large energy source to pump the weapon itself.

Then, assuming these hurdles can be overcome, then it would have to be built, and all those new-fangled propulsion systems would have to be added to it to move it around to be able to target different asteroids (or whatever else).

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com