Book Review: Saucers, Swatstikas And Psyops – A History Of A Breakaway Civilization: Hidden Aerospace Technologies & Psychological Operations by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell | #SmartReads

TheBreakaway | BreakawayConciousness
Zy Marquiez
July 27, 2017

Saucers, Swatstikas And Psyops – A History Of A Breakaway Civilization: Hidden Aerospace Technologies And Psychological Operations by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell is a phenomenal introduction into his analysis of the breakaway civilization.

In this introductory book to his breakaway civilization trilogy, Dr. Farrell seeks to shed light into the murky and malicious mechanism that has brought about arguably the first modern breakaway civilization: The Nazis.

As Dr. Farrell himself notes, nigh nobody has taken a gander at the field of studying Breakaway Civilizations, except for a handful of individuals.  Those individuals are Carroll Quigley and Richard Dolan.  Be that as it may, Dr. Farrell’s point in creating this book is not to overthrow the works of those two prior authors, but to supplement them with a fresh new set of eyes that attempts to look at the broader picture (as well as implications) and ascertain what other threads of data might lie unknown but still remain crucial to this topic.

Moreover, Dr. Farrell intriguingly touches upon how the Nazi UFO mythos came to light, which is actually quite an illuminating examination since it ties into other nefarious dealings, considering who publically manifested the meme. Another component pondered at lengths are psychological operations (psy-ops), since they feature prominently in understanding the totality of the breakaway phenomenon and how UFO’s serve as a perfect cover for it.

Essentially, what Dr. Farrell seeks to do, and argues quite well for, is bring about a prima facie case for the very existence of a Breakaway Civilization, its structure, how its remained in power for so long, and many of its underlying tentacles, one intriguing one being the topic of psy-ops.

Hearkening back to psychological operations, Dr. Farrell takes an intriguing route, not oft-considered, and instead of analyzing the George ADamnski case for its extraterrestrial implications, he analyzes it for its implications as a psy-op.  This is crucial, because it helps lay the foundation for much of what takes place within UFOlogy and how the consideration of anything other than the ET-hypothesis for our advanced technologies is looked at askance, even though evidence keeps mounting that both hypothesis are plausible, and should be considered equally.  In respect to Adamski, Farrell also breaks down not only inconsistencies within the account, but also other overlooked data sets that could imply more nefarious components therein.

Perception management and social engineering are also given a keen glance, which is vital since by the very nature of the technologies, those behind some of the UFOs could employ the technology to manipulate the views of the populace on a mass scale.  This, of course would mean that very notion of UFOs could be used to carry out psychological operations of all types on an unsuspecting public.  The analysis is quite intriguing because it gives a new fresh set of eyes to view much of what has happened in the UFOlogy community and with contactees.

Another intriguing point in the book is Dr. Farrell’s analysis of the provocative and enduring statements made by former chief of Lockheed’s Skunk Work’s’ division, Ben Rich.  The implications of this part alone are rather staggering.  A fair glance is also given to the suppression of Tesla’s work, Project Skyvault, Project Winterhaven, Torsion Physics, and more.

The book also features a table of contents that is extremely informative, while also containing a rather useful bibliography for researchers that wish to follow up the information further.

Dr. Farrell rounds out the book with a salient gander at the financial, geographic and historical components of the breakaway civilization.  These areas of research serve as the cornerstone upon which to cement all previous commentaries and analysis throughout the book as it gives extensive evidence for the capability of such a civilization to exist, as well as the implications thereof.   The disturbing connections of the Nazis and radical Islam, and how those take part in psychological operations is also given a look, since it bears much importance in our current paradigm and that of radical Islam.  More importantly, Dr. Farrell also touches upon the disturbing Nazi plan to come back after the war.  For more on this please read Dr. Farrell’s The Third Way – The Nazi International, European Union & Corporate Fascism, which is a phenomenal read in its entirety and serves to explain much of what is also currently taking place in the world.

To those that might think its ludicrous that the Nazi’s even contemplated ‘coming back’ from the war, the author cites another reliable source to show that this was in fact the case:

“Captured Nazi documents reveal they had a comeback plan.  Their plan to regain power after the war revolved around using their friends and fascist sympathizers in other countries – particularly in the United States – to do their bidding while rebuilding Germany.  These documents note that, as late as 1944, the Nazis were hoping for a Republican victory in the presidential election because they would get an easier peace.  The second part of their plan aimed at provoking a war between the U.S. and Soviet Union would allow the Nazis to retake power in Germany without U.S. intervention.”

Farrell also notes another separate sourced document that goes on to state that the Nazis had to continue carrying out their plans underground.[2]

In its mind-bending totality, Saucers, Swatstikas And Psyops is a book pregnant with implications that will undoubtedly become more and more apparent with time.  This exposition by Dr. Farrell outlining the foundation for the breakaway civilization, its psychological operations, and the historical details certainly sets the stage for further areas of research.

One great aspect of the book, is that Saucers, Swatstikas And Psyops is chock-full of sources and footnotes, which allow the reader not only a chance to verify and also follow up research, but also shows the seriousness of Dr. Farrell’s work.

For those seeking further information bout the Nazi’s Postwar plan, please read Dr. Farrell’s, please read The ThirdWay – The Nazi International, European Union & Corporate Fascism.  And for those seeking information about the Breakaway Civilizations please read the second and third book in Dr. Farrell’s trilogy:

Covert Wars & Breakaway Civilizations – The Secret Space Program, Celestial Psyops & Hidden Conflicts
Covert Wars & Clash Of Civilizations – UFOs, Oligarchs & Space Secrecy

[1] Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D., Glen Yeadon & John Hawkins, The Nazi Hydra In America: The Suppressed History Of A Century, p.23., cited in Saucers, Swastikas & Psyops, p. 109.]
[2] Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D., Saucers, Swastikas & Psyops, p. 113.
If you find value in this information, please share it.  This article is free and open source.  All individuals have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to Zy Marquiez and
About The Author:

Zy Marquiez is an avid book reviewer, inquirer, an open-minded skeptic, yogi, and freelance writer who aims at empowering individuals while also studying and regularly mirroring subjects like Consciousness, Education, Creativity, The Individual, Ancient History & Ancient Civilizations, Forbidden Archaeology, Big Pharma, Alternative Health, Space, Geoengineering, Social Engineering, Propaganda, and much more.

His other blog, features mainly his personal work, while serves as a media portal which mirrors vital information nigh always ignored by mainstream press, but still highly crucial to our individual understanding of various facets of the world

Merkel: No Plans Exist For German Nuclear Weapons

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D.
February 16, 2017

This particular article was right at the top of the list this past week of articles that people sent in. And it’s worth having a few “record corrections” here. Frau Merkel, it seems, has been rather busy. In short, spokesmen for the Chancellorin have been forced to deny that there are no plans for Germany to acquire nuclear weapons as a component of the “all European army” it has been pushing for. Here’s two versions of the story, one from our friends at Zero Hedge, and the other from the London Times:

Merkel Forced To Deny Plans For European Nuclear Superpower

Merkel forced to deny Germany planning to lead a European nuclear superpower

I scarcely know where to begin on this one, for the disingenuousness of the story – not from the media reporting it, but rather from the track record of Germany since the end of the Second World War – is there for all to see if one knows where to look. William Manchester, in his well-known book, The Arms of Krupp, records that the famous German armaments firm and cannon-maker had completed a functioning reactor in a secret installation in Julich, near the Dutch border, by the end of the 1950s. In that book he records an interview with one of the scientists working at the installation, who rather sheepishly admitted that Germany was closing the entire nuclear fuel cycle. By the 1960s, it had. Then, in 1978, The New York Times Books published an important but regrettably overlooked book by Barbara Rogers and Zdenek Cervenka, titled The Nuclear Axis: The Secret Collaboration Between West Germany and South Africa, a book which I reviewed in my book The Third Way: The Nazi International, European Union, and Corporate Fascism. Rogers and Cervenka make a convincing case that the secret power behind South Africa’s and even Israel’s bomb was West Germany.

As I also noted in my book, Germany played a crucial role during the 1970s and 80s, in Iran’s acquisition of nuclear technologies, including those of isotope enrichment, forming the foundations for Iran’s present nuclear capabilities. It need not be mentioned, of course, that Frau Merkel’s government was instrumental in brokering the controversial deal between Iran and the Obama Administration. Well, of course they were! Iran is a major German trading partner, and some of that trade historically includes… well, you know.

I noted something else in The Third Way, namely, that the pro-Russian website, Global Research, ran an article by Canadian professor Michael Chossudovsky titled “Belgium of Iran, where’s the Nuclear Threat? Europe’s Five Undeclared Nuclear Weapons states” (see See also my The Third Way, pp. 109-111) In that article, Professor Chossudovsky points out an uncomfortable truth:

While Germany is not categorized officially as a nuclear power, it produces nuclear warheads for the French Navy. It stockpiles nuclear warheads (made in America) and it has the capabilities of delivering nuclear weapons. Moreover, The European Aeronautic Defense and Space Company – EADS, a Franco-German-Spanish joint venture, controlled by Deutsche Aerospace and the powerful Daimler Group is Europe’s second largest military producer, supplying France’s M51 nuclear missile.

Germany imports and deploys nuclear warheads from the U.S. It also produced nuclear warheads which are exported to France. Yet it is classified as a non-nuclear state. (The Third Way, p. 110, citing the Global Research website article.)

Now, in case all this technicality is a little too obscure, I also pointed out in the Third Way that France’s M51 missile, which is produced by a Franco-German-Spanish company, which in turn is controlled by Deutsche Aerospace and the Daimler Group, is a submarine launched intercontinental ballistic missile with mirved warheads (which are also produced by Germany) in the 200-300 kiloton range(so we’re told), which means those warheads are strategic warheads, and probably either boosted fission devices or full-up (but small) hydrogen bombs. In short, not only has the infrastructure of a trans-European nuclear deterrent long been in place, organized around the French force de frappe, that organization conveniently allows Germany to dodge the classification as a thermonuclear power (“See? We’re selling all this to the French… we’re not buying it ourselves”), it also conveniently makes France the target of opportunity should things ever actually go “hot.” But any way one slices it, if Mr. Chossudovsky’s revelations are anywhere close to the truth, then the reality is, like it or not, Germany already is a de facto thermonuclear power. This explains a lot, geopolitically, and in point of fact, when one considers Professor Chossudovsky’s article in the context of the Rogers-Cervenka research from the late 1970s, it’s clear that infrastructure has been in place for a very long time. In short, their research corroborates Chossodovsy’s allegations.

What does all this mean? Well, in terms of Frau Merkel’s “denials” and “reassurances”, it means simply that she’s lying. But I suspect most people already suspected that. More importantly, it means that should the EU break apart, then that whole infrastructure will have to come out into the open, and that the pressures on Germany to openly rearm to ensure the security of Eastern Europe – as the Times article suggests – will be enormous. Germany and France will continue to collaborate militarily, and announce “changes” to that collaboration to reflect “new European realities.” One might even go so far as to say that the French will allow the Germans to test their own thermonuclear warheads in the French test sites in the Pacific just to make it all “official”.

Then again, why bother with any tests? After all, the French have already tested those German SLBMs and warheads… OTRAG, anyone?

…and then there’s Japan…

See you on the flip side…

Read More At:

About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

That Russian Hacking Thing: A “Third Force” Trying To Stir…

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
January 25, 2017

Now that the election in the USA is over, it’s worth looking back on that hacking meme. And it is “safe” to do so now, aside from the hysteria that was taking place. As I watched all of it, it struck me as extremely odd that the whole hacking meme seemed disturbingly contrived. We were supposed to believe that “Russia did it,” an idea I found ridiculous then and still do. Then, there was the murder of Democratic national committee staffer Seth Rich. Many theorized that he was behind some of the damning leaks to Wikileaks, and there was the usual amount of conspiracy theory that the unfortunate Mr. Rich was yet another victim in the long list of dead bodies that seem to follow the Clintons around; it was another “Arkancide.” Well, I have my doubts about that too (though I certainly don’t have any doubts about the criminality and corruption of the Clintons). Why? For the simple reason that “offing people” when in the middle of a presidential campaign would be too risky. Best to wait until after the election, and dump the body in a park in Washington DC and claim it was suicide.

To put it as bluntly as possible, there was an element of theater to all this I found very disturbing; it was all… well, too convenient. The real goal, it seemed to me, was not to favor Darth Hillary or “The Donald,” but rather, to work up USA-Russia tensions into a fine frothy lather of hysteria. It looked, if I may put it even more bluntly, very much like the pattern of the alleged postwar Nazi document, The Madrid Circular, that I reviewed in my book The Third Way: create maximum maneuvering room for your merry band of postwar Fascist buddies by maximizing tensions between Russia and the USA. The Clinton-Trump-Putin theater looked and felt too contrived to me.

In that regard, consider the following article shared by G.L.R.:

Security Threats to Russia: The Analysis of the 2016 FSB Press Releases (Part 3 – Hacking & Other Challenges)

Mr. G.L.R. drew my attention to these passages, and I pass this focus along to you:

The FSB press release published on July 30 dealt more specifically with the issue of cyberattacks and cyber-espionage.[4] In fact, it reported that the FSB specialists were able to uncover an especially damaging virus program infiltrated into the network of more than 20 organizations on the territory of Russia. These organizations included the Russian government, military, and academic institutions and even the sectors of the Russian military-industrial complex.

The FSB did not comment as to where this malicious software could have come from. It just stated that it resembled the software found in other cyberattacks around the world. In my opinion, the description of the way that the virus infected the victims’ computers and the damage it caused resembled very much the hacks perpetrated in the U.S., both on the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and on Hillary Clinton’s campaign manager John Podesta. Considering the timing of the release (the end of July), just after the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia was over and the full extent of the U.S. hacks became publicly known, it definitely raises several very significant questions.

First, was this massive hacking of the Russian “critical infrastructure” a retaliation by the U.S. intelligence agencies for the DNC and Podesta hacks allegedly perpetrated by the Russian military intelligence agency (GRU)? And if so, will the hacked emails and information be made publicly available? Will be we soon be reading the embarrassing details of the Russian government and military officials’ undercover dealings?

Or, alternatively, was this perhaps done by a third party which also hacked the DNC and Podesta? Following in the footsteps of the James Bond classic “From Russia, with Love,” is there perhaps a secret (criminal) network which uses the rogue elements of different intelligence communities to amplify the confrontation between the U.S. and Russia? To get the U.S. to blame Russia and, likewise, Russia to blame the U.S. for criminal deeds actually perpetrated by this hidden network. This of course is a mere speculation. But the coincidence of the almost simultaneous cyber-attacks cannot be denied. (Emphasis added)

In other words, while the corporate controlled media in the USSA was howling about Russian hacking of the Clinton campaign and wringing its hands over Russian influence on the election(overlooking, conveniently, Frau Merkel’s contributions to Darth Hillary’s campaign), Russia itself was being hacked at exactly the same time.

Notably, the FSB (Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezhopaznosmu) is admitting not only the hacks, but their extensive nature, but not indicating any point of origin. We may take this as…

Continue Reading At:

About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Conflicting Messages From NATO & EU
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
November 30, 2016

As readers here can tell, over this past week I’ve been largely concentrating on geopolitical stories, particularly those that seem to have been due to blowback and implications from the American presidential election/referendum. In this respect, there are three articles that caught my attention this week, because they are sending out mixed messages. They were shared, respectively, by Mr. E.O., Mr. T.M., and Ms. C:

‘Russia is not our enemy’ – NATO Navy Commander

The EU is pursuing defense policies that rely less on the US after Trump’s win

European Union Confirm EU Army Will Launch In 2017

Let’s start with the last article first. Notably, the expressed reason for creating a “pan-European” military is the BREXIT vote, which, as we’ll see, is probably nonsense, but a convenient way for the EU globaloney crowd to continue pouting and to strengthen their hand in the difficult negotiations ahead. The real reasons are expressed in the second article, namely, the election of Donald Trump. To be sure, this constitutes another convenient excuse, for the idea of a common European military has been the goal all along. Mr. Trump simple affords an excuse to “speed the process up”, as a common military gives a bureaucratic reason and glue to keep the otherwise faltering EU together.

From a strategic point of view, the creation of a European army is necessary, at least, if the EU’s pretensions to being the “third way” or “third superpower” between the US and Russia (or, depending on one’s lights, China), are to have any weight. With the loss of Great Britain to the project, Europe’s sole remaining acknowledged thermonuclear power is France, although most regular readers here are aware that I personally think Germany is also a thermonuclear power, a thing kept relatively quiet by the corporate globalist media, perhaps in the name of political “expediency.” More importantly, the European powers individually have neither the strategic depth of a Russia, China, USA or even Brazil, nor do any of them individually have a population base of more than 100 million. If Europe is to project deterrent power of a conventional military nature to any of the powers that do have these things, it simply will require a military on a large population base, and that is only possible with an integrated European military.

The effectiveness of such a military integration, however, is in doubt. It will require integrated armaments industries (a step towards which was taken with recent mergers of French and German armaments concerns in a kind of modern version of a Schneider Creusot-Krupp monster, if one can imagine such a thing; the Airbus consortium of companies already being a framework for potential collaboration in aerospace military matters, and of course there’s the “Eurofigher”), but more importantly, a way to manage efficiently the units of so many different nationalities and languages. Think of it as a kind of Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian army, on steroids, probably similarly based on two “official languages”, in this case, not German and Hungarian, but rather German and French. And of course, all this will mean further erosions of national sovereignty in Europe, and in the current political climate, that could become very problematic. Does the average Frenchman want decisions for war or peace being made by Brussels bureaucrats, given their track record of…

Continue Reading At:

Profile photo of Joseph P. Farrell

About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.




Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
July 16, 2016

Remember that classified 9/11 report that was ordered by the Bush White House to be classified and withheld from public view? Well apparently a great number of you did, for I received a veritable flood of articles and links to it, and I want to thank you all. Before getting into today’s high octane speculation, here’s the link to the actual pdf file of that document, and trust me, it’s well worth reading and pondering, especially in today’s world where most western leaders and media have their heads buried in the sand:

Declassified 9/11 file

A careful reading of the document discloses one overall, and unavoidable, conclusion: the fingerprints of the (Out)house of Saud are all over the 9/11 event, insofar as the hijackers are concerned.  And this, indeed, raises once again the question of why the Bush Jr administration would have insisted upon it being withheld from the public during the 9/11 Commission hearings, hearings which, you’ll recall, that administration was none too enthused about. The consistent pattern of hijacker association to the (out)house of Saud highlights once again that disturbing set of connections between the Bush family, its close associates, and members of the Saudi “government.”

Most regular readers of this website, and those familiar with my interviews or, for that matter, with my most recent book Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery also know that I believe, unlike most 9/11 researchers, that the whole operation was not merely a two-leveled operation, consisting of the hikackers/patsies at the outer or first, surface level, and a deeper level of a rogue network within the American national security/military/intelligence complex. Such views are fairly standard within the 9/11 community, and to that extent, I share them, and share also its fairly early determination that the (out)house of Saud played a role at both levels in some fashion.

But as most readers are also aware that I believe that 9/11 was a penetrated operation at that second deeper level, i.e., that there was a third player, neither a rogue neo-con network within the American deep state, nor simply the level of the Muslim hijackers. In that vein, I was intrigued by the statements of former US Senator Bob Graham during an American news show, when he indicated that he thought the report should be declassified, because its contents were “explosive” and because it indicated foreign “governments” were involved. This comment focused my attention like a laser, for it meant that someone else was involved other than the usual suspects, the miserable (out)house of Saud. It was the possibility of other unknown players that intrigued me, and I searched for whom I thought those other players might be… who was that third level? Of course there were the usual suspects – Israel from the “Jews are behind everything” crowd, but I dismiss this for the simple reason that geopolitically it has nothing to gain from the creation of such chaos.

My suspicions were fueled, as I wrote in Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, and Secret Sorcery, by the post-9/11 statements of former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who indicated that Al-Qaeda was connected to a “global network”, but never specified what that network was. Russian economist Dr. Tatyana Koryagana also stated, before 9/11 that the USA would be the target of coordinated terrorist attacks on American soil, by a global network run by a few men with access to assets in excess of $300,000,000,000,000 dollars.  Statements like this indicated that something else, entirely, lay at the heart of that deepest players, something far exceeding the delusion of the (out)house of Saud or rogue neo-con networks in the American deep state.

Continue Reading At:

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell – Jay Dyer: Tragedy & Hope, Third Way & CERN [Half]

Jay Dyer
July 11, 2016

As an excellent complement to my Tragedy and Hope lecture series covering the entire text, Dr. Joseph P. Farrell joined me to cover his book, The Third Way. His book looks at the Nazi continental bloc model and how hidden history concerning the background to the founding of the European Union is quite surprising. The top-down, corporate-fascist model of technocracy was both an axis and allied plan, and Dr. Farrell’s research is a perfect addition to Dr. Quigley’s. In the second half, we look at what CERN might be a cover for, including hints of Tesla and hidden metaphysics and the possible association with the massive deep state underground base programs. Dr. Farrell’s books can be purchased here, while his recent updates and analyses can be found here, at the Giza Death Star.

Jay Dyer’s Website:

Dr. Farrell’s Website:

This is the first free half of the full interview which can be obtained by subscribing to JaysAnalysis at the PayPal links for $4.95 a month or $60.00 a year.

[Secret Space Program 2015] – Dr. Joseph P. Farrell – Cosmic War & Cosmic Versailles [Presentation 1]

Zy Marquiez
June 16, 2016

During this previous Secret Space Program Conference held last year in Bastrop, Texas, was able to meet Dr. Joseph P. Farrell and personally thank him for all the work he has done.  His work has been quite pivotal in bringing many newfound ideas to the fold.  Ideas that are utterly needed to be able to grasp the intricacy of the landscape that the global populace finds itself currently in.

Farrell is a highly renown scholar, and the author of many highly fascinating books, such as The Third Way – The Nazi International, European Union, Fascism published last year, as well as his latest book, Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks, And Secret Sorcery: The Fascist International, 9/11 & Penetrated Operations.

In any case, this particular presentation, which is the first of a two-part series, is titled Cosmic War – Cosmic Versailles.

Farrell begins by introducing the outline of his presentation and giving a brief presentation of each.  This includes:

I.  A Look Back – San Mateo 2014 – The-War Mega-Manhattan Project On Steroids
II.  The Historical Context
III.  The Mythological Context
IV.  The Implications For The National Security-Breakaway Civilization/Secret Space program Complex .

As he alludes, the whole point of everything that is going on behind the scenes with the ones running the Breakaway Civilization is to ‘avoid a Tower of Babel’ moment.  “A repetition of things that may have happened in the distant past.  And in that respect i also suggested that they would go back and look at the ancient texts to see if there was any guidance.  To see if there was something in those texts that might be possible to formulate their policies.  And in this respect, the parallels between WWI and what I am calling the Cosmic Versailles are truly astonishing.”

Farrell thence proceeds with his main thesis, which is “that the post Cosmic War period…I believe that there was an ancient Cosmic War fought right here in our Solar System.  And that this may have created a Versailles treaty situation…that’s what we’re going to be examining today.”  [For those interested in learning more about the Cosmic War, please refer to his book which outlines this idea in incredible detail.]

Transitioning into the first major part of his outline, Farrell hones in on the next part of his presentation, which focuses on the multi-faceted threat of the Communists, the post-war Nazis, and UFOs.

This trifecta of power, “would have forced them to create a Manhattan Project on steroids lasting several decades.  But with immediate need to develop technologies, reconnaissance technologies potentially able to scout out and find out what the Soviet Bloc was up too, find out where the Nazis were and what they were up too, that’s a big part of my work.  And then finally not only to do this but secondly to introduce a program designed to deal with the problem posed by UFOs, and to institute a long range black projects technological research program to emulate the performance characteristics of UFOs if possible, and achieve parity, or near parity.  And you’re going to be hearing I’m quite certain from Dr. Paul LaViolette, one of my favorite researchers in this field about some of these technologies.”

Farrell continues “This implies, that the National Security establishment had concluded as their trying to achieve parity that UFOs as I indicated last year, pose a potential National Security threat, because much of UFO activity was concentrated over American and Soviet defense installations…Last year I indicated at a Soviet Nuclear ICBM base…at Byelokoroviche in the Ukraine UFOs actually activated the launch sequence of soviet ICBMs leaving Soviet crews scrambling to shut this down and prevent a thermonuclear war.”  [Emphasis added]

Due to all of the above, and couple with much of what was covered last year by Farrell, “the national security state a study of ancient religious mythological texts and lore for the purposes and seeing i they can determine who was behind the UFOs.  Secondly, if possible, where they were from.  Thirdly, what they wanted.  Fourthly, what their motivations were.  Were they hostile?”

Farrell states that at minimum, much of what was going on behind the scenes would have to have been seen as a “provocative act” by the Breakaway Complex.  This would very much spawn an enormous drive to achieve parity, or near parity, as quickly as possible.  A coupled concern to that is spoken thence by Farrell, which is that “If that’s the case, than they need to determine whether or not psychological warfare operations can be mounted against them.”

Proceeding to delineate the possible importance of this, Farrell points out that “…if there is a Cosmic Versailles, if there is some treaty that you might be able to find traces of in ancient texts, in ancient lore, then they need to know the terms of that treaty.  Is it still in effect?  What happens if its violated?”  Ultimately, “their goal [The Breakaway Complex’s] was to prevent  a second interference, a second tower of Babel moment in human history.”

Rewinding a bit, Farrell thence mentions that the possibility of why UFOs began appearing in large numbers “at the beginning of the human nuclear and thermonuclear era was possibly because the nuclear bomb, per the observations of Nazi scientist Dr. Ronald Richter in Argentina, may have been functioning as “transducers” of energies from the configuration of local space-time…That is to say from the positions of the planets and so on when and where on the surface of the Earth the bomb is set off.  …For a brief moment it functions as a gateway, as a “transducer” of the zero point energy as it is configured in local space.”

Farrell’s thesis follows:

“I’ve suggested, in many interviews, that there is a direct analogy between the post-World War One settlement between the Allied and Associated Powers and the Central Powers, and that ancient Cosmic War that I believe to have been fought by the “gods” within our own solar system.  But I have left my detailed reasons for making this observation largely unstated.  So you’re going to hear them here for the first time.”

Transitioning into the next part of his presentation, Farrell tackles an unexpected, and yet, still incisive point, which is that of artillery [during the world wars?], and its historical context with this abstruse issue.

“About 100 years and a few months ago…this man August von Mackensen…in the month of April of 1915, launched what was supposed to have been a limited offensive in Tarnów, Gorlice…to help relieve the Russian pressure on Germany’s Austro-Hungarian allies.  But what happened was that his offensive was so successful, and so brutal, that the Russian lines began to collapse to the point that Germany decided to go on a front wide offensive in 1915.  It nearly led to the complete collapse and exit of Russia from the war.”

Farrell continues:  “…what made all that possible was this man right here, this is Lt. Colonel Georg Bruchmueller [Operation Michael: the “Kaiserschlacht” March 1918 The roar was heard in Paris]…we all heard the history books of how on the Western front the allies and Germans bombarded each other for weeks on end with artillery to create breakthroughs supposedly in the trench system.  This man changed the tactics completely…he believed in sudden massive coordinated artillery, infantry, cavalry movements, with time tables…but by 1918 these tactics were then applied on the final German offensive in March of 1918, beginning with the “Kaiserschlacht” the first German offensive…after the Germans surrendered to the central powers.  On such a narrow front this man concentrated over 6,000 artillery tubes on a front of about 25 miles against the British lines.  And in a 5 hour bombardment hurled more ordnance on British lines then we dropped on Nazi Germany in all of WWII…of course it sent the British reeling.  The roar was so bad from that intense 5-hour bombardment it could be heard 60 miles away in Paris.”   [Emphasis added]

Why is all of this important?   Farrell elucidates:  “It’s because when we get to Versailles, something happens.  And its precisely these six points that indicate to me that there may have been a Cosmic Versailles at the end of that Cosmic War in distances of high antiquity.  The six crucial points are these”

1.  The “Family Feud “that was WWI was over.

For consider, Kaiser Wilhelm II was the cousin of King George of the United Kingdom.”
2.  Reparations – Tribute and Sacrifice

“Versailles, stipulated massive war reparations.  Germany had to pay war reparations to the allies.  And I want you t think of this in terms borrowing the insights of Secretary Fitts…I want you to think of this in terms of a tithe.  Or of the ancient practice of tribute to a conquering king and so massive were the reparations on the Germans that what you were really doing is that your harvesting their National Wealth and productivity of each and every last living individual German.  So in a certain sense its even sacrifice.”

3.  Inventorying and Disarmament: the forbidding of certain types of weapons.

“What did the allied and associated powers do?  First of all, they took an inventory, they’ve just suffered 4 years of war, and in the final year of the war these massive German offensives with numbers of artillery that boggle the mind of all calibers of all calibers…First thing the allies do is they inventory the German war machine and stipulate in the disarmament clauses of the treaty that the German Reich would be prohibited from the manufacture of certain types of weapons.  And if you stop to think about this if you’ve read my book, the Cosmic War, I put in that book the entire Epic of Ninurta – an ancient Mesopotamian text – and I did that for a very specific reason.  Because when you read this text its hardly an epic.  It’s like reading the index of a Sears catalog.  It’s simply an inventory, and most interestingly this is an epic about actions being taken after a war of the Gods. And the inventory is an inventory of the weapons that were used to fight this war.  And some of that technology was taken by the victors and used and applied in other context.  Some of the technology was destroyed.  And a very small category of that technology that could not be destroyed was hidden.”  [Emphasis added]

4.  Monitoring

“As a part of the stipulations of the treaty, the Versailles system set up a system of monitoring to ensure German compliance with the treaty.  In other words, you don’t rely on the enemy that you just defeated to tell you “Oh no we’re not building any of that”…you set up a system of monitoring and this has both a public, and a secret aspect because the French of course insisted in the treaty that they be able to send their attachés and representatives to all the German heavy industries plants and inspect them to make sure that the Germans weren’t producing any heavy armaments that they had the bitter experience of facing.  But this also means, that they set up a system of spies and i want you to file that one in the back of your mind, because that is going to be a very crucial point.

5.  The “Quarantine”: Demilitarization Of The Rhineland

They set up a quarantine zone around Germany and insisted, and this is one of the quarantine zones [Farrell points to the screen, to the Rhineland map].  That extended to a zone as you can see of about 30 kilometers on the East bank of the Rhine…That whole area was demilitarized, it was a quarantine zone…  Incidentally they set up another one on the eastern side of Germany in a very different way.  And I want you to file that one in the back of your mind.”

6.  The Survival Of Both Parties

“The most significant point – WWI was really sort of Act 1, as we know, in a great world war that the world fought from 1914, to 1945.  And WWI ended more or less as a stalemate…Now if the National Security Establishment is formed in this crucible this is the way they’re going to look at things.  They’re going to look at recent human history WWI/WW2 and apply this Versailles text to the reading of ancient text, to the reading of ancient mythology.”

From here Farrell gives a small synopsis of what WWI was:

1.  The First World War was a family feud between related monarchs: Edward VII of Great Britain [who did so much to engineer the war], was the son of Queen Victoria, and hence, the uncle of Kaiser Wilhelm II, whose mother was Victoria’s daughter, which makes him a cousin to Tsar Nicholas via Tsarina Alexandra other family ties.

Farrell continues, “When you look back and look at the ancient Mesopotamian text in particular that refer to this “Cosmic War”, what you see is a war fought among the gods..they are all related to each other.   It’s a big family feud – it’s a big civil war.”

1.  The “Cosmic War” was a family feud between related “gods”, the most famous example being Mesopotamian and Greek mythology, with the war between Tiamat and Marduk, later between Nergal [Mars], Ninurta, Enki, et al. [since they’re all descended from Tiamat], or the war between Chronos [Saturn], the Titans, and Zeus.

Farrell further expounds, “The Greeks have their version of this, the Romans have their version of this, the Aztecs have a version of this, the Vedas have their versions of this, the bible – Lucifer, Michael, The War In Heaven.  Everybody has a version of this “Cosmic War”.

Moving onto the Mythological Context, Farrell points out in a slide as he comments about:

In the Versailles Matrix: Pay reparations, or be subject to the invasion and occupation of the industrial region [i.e., ruination of your economy] and the forcible extraction of tribute: The Ruhr 1923.

The Sacrifice Matrix:  Pay the sacrifice or be subject to retribution and bad crops [i.e. the forcible ruination of your economy]

“If you look at the ancient practice, what’s sacrifice?  Pay the tribute, pay the sacrifice, or be subject to military occupation, deportation…Or make your sacrifice, make your animal sacrifice, your human sacrifice, and if you don’t, you’ll have bad crops.  Now I want to stress something that’s very important, if you look at most of these ancient texts and traditions, sacrifice begins to rise, begins to become an acceptable practice, after some sort of war.”
Farrell follows with this intriguing quotation:

“The Toltecs were engaged [in battle] at a place call Netlalpan.  And when they had taken captives, human sacrifice also got started…Indeed, every kind of human sacrifice got started then…It was the devils who started them…Huemec sacrificed a human streamer, thus making payment.”  [Emphasis Added] [Note: By payment Farrell equates that to a reparation].
History and Mythology Of The Azecs – The Codex Chimalpopoca, trans. from the Nahuatl by John Biehorst, p. 118, cited in Grid Of The Gods, p. 208

Is there more?  Farrell sheds light on this:

“Note what we have, in just the Aztec tradition alone, just as we have incidentally in the western Christian tradition, the idea of:

1.  A Primordial war or conflict followed by
2.  The institution of bloody sacrifice to maintain the broken order and to stave off economic collapse by payment of a “debt”.  It’s a tithe, it’s a tribute, it’s a way of symbolizing that you won the wealth and labor of an entire civilization, because they are defeated in war.”

Traveling further into the past, Farrell further expounds:

“Sacrifice is also viewed as an analogue to the “dismemberment” that you see in some cosmological and metaphysical processes of the differentiation in some cultures that leads to creation.  In the Vedic texts, this whole process of differentiation, that creates all the fullness, and diversity, that you and I know and experience in everyday life.  This is described in the Vedic texts as “dismemberment”…In some cultures this idea of sacrifice expresses itself how?  Linda Howe has done yeomen’s work studying the phenomenon of cattle mutilations.  And even in some cases human mutilation.  What is this for? This might be a component, of the institution, of some sort of reparations clause in some far distant treaty of Versailles.”

Farrell then proceeds with another comparison to Versailles in a slide:

“The treaty of Versailles demanded that Germany turn over copies of its big road mobile 16.8 “Big Bertha” siege guns, and demanded that Germany also turn over a copy of “the Paris Gun”.  The Germans refused to do the latter, claiming they had destroyed all copies of the gun and any papers and plans detailing it.  Suspiciously, they also passed a law making it the highest state secret, forbidding those with knowledge of it to talk about it.  The Allies, for their part,

1.  Carted off what weapons they could;
2.  studied them and made use of the technology both in military and other applications, and
3.  destroyed as much of the “really nasty” stuff as they could find, and ordered the Germans not to build any more of it.”

“Why did I put that in there [picture of the Paris gun]?” Farrell inquires, thus continuing, “because the projectiles from that weapon were the first man-made objects in lower outer space.  It shot up into the stratosphere, and that’s how it was able to achieve long range.”

Not surprisingly, in WWII, Farrell points out, that the Germans proceeded to bring forth the Krupp 21cm K12E/Krupp 28cm K5E weapons, essentially showing that they never did get rid of the previous “Paris Gun” blue prints.

Hearkening back to Mesopotamia, Farrell delves deeper into the Epic Of Ninurta, which “indicates a similar if not identical pattern of the inventorying, destruction, and secreting of technology, for in The Cosmic War, I cite the “epic” at length [pp. 222-227], in which I pointed out that the “epic” is really an inventory of the technology – consisting of various “stones” – of the defeated enemy.  There were three classes of technology [stones]:

1.  Stones to be preserved and carried off by the victor for study and use in the other applications [pp. 227-229];
2.  Stones that were ordered to be smashed and pulverized [pp.230]; and finally;
3.  Stones that could not be destroyed:  One of these, the “Elel” stone, is spoken of this way in the Epic Of Ninurta:

[Note: in the text, the stones [such as Elel] are addressed directly, like you’re talking directly to them.]

“Elel, intelligently you caused terror of me to descend on the Mountains [which can also mean planet, and pyramid], where discord had broken out.  In the rebel lands you proclaimed my name among my people who had banded together.  Nothing of your wholeness shall be diminished.  It shall be greatly suited to the clash of weapons…You shall be set up on a pedestal in my great courtyard.”

In other words, the implication is that the Elel stone is a kind of “philosopher’s stone” of Weapons technologies, an “ultimate weapon”, and since it could not be destroyed, it was hidden.”  [Italic emphasis in original]

Farrell follows with another slide:

“The Versailles Treaty stipulated that allied [and particularly French] military attaches would have access, at any time, and unannounced, to all German heavy industry and armaments plants for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the Treaty.  Additionally, the French put into place an expanded on the ground human intelligence capability to spy on German compliance.  [Germany, incidentally, as I detail in The Third Way: The Nazi International, The European Union, and Corporate Fascism, developed the policy of using German firms in proxy nations to develop forbidden military technologies, a lesson with its own implications for the “cosmic war” scenario.]
In short, there had to be a system to ensure treaty compliance, a system of espionage, or…”

Transitioning to another slide, Farrell couples the above former with the following:

…”Watchers.”  The Slavonic text of the Book Of The Secrets Of Enoch, ch. 18: 1-3 states:

“The men took and brought me up into the fifth heaven [what does this numbering of heaven really mean?], and I saw there many hosts not to be counted called Grigori; and their appearance, was like men, and their size was greater than that of the giantsAnd their countenances were withered, and their lips are always silent.” [pp. 20-21] [Italic emphasis in original, bold emphasis added.]


“In the footnote to this passage, however, Morfill and Charles not that the “Grigori” is another name for the “Watchers,” that class of humanoid beings whose duty was to “watch’ and if necessary guide [that is to say, interfere with] humanity.”  [Q: Why was it necessary to watch and guide humanity?]

“The answer may be that in the aftermath of a Cosmic War, and incidentally in my view it may have included the destruction of an entire planet, a la Star Wars, is what you would do.  You destroy the inventory and technology that made such a war and the destruction of such a planet possible, number one.  And number two, you’d prohibit the development of that technology again.  And number three, you would muddle the science to prevent humanity from achieving that kind of technological prowess again, and misapply it.  And you’d try and mold and direct human affairs.” [Bold emphasis added]

“Morfill and Charles also state:

“The text cannot mean that all the watchers rebelled, but only that it was from the class of watchers that the rebels proceeded.”  [Note that you now have two post-cosmic-war elites: a “good” one and a “bad” one, both on near planet Earth, watching and manipulating humanity.]  “It is of course, just possible that the writers’ scheme may differ from the conception we have given above ,and be as follows:

“The rebellious watcers, with their prince Satanail, are confined to the fifth heaven.  The subordinate angels who followed them are imprisoned in the second heaven, where as the watchers who went down to earth and sinned with women are imprisoned under the earth.” [p. 20-22, n. on “the fifth heaven.”  [Italic emphasis in the original]

In other words, we have a quarantine zone around, and to some extent, inclusive of, the Earth, again in a kind of “cosmic Versailles” template.”

Farrell follows with another tidbit of info by Morfill and Charles,”…that it was “Under the sphere [i.e. within the orbit of] the moon, which is the least under all, is a firmament…and there the souls of the demons are.” [p. 36, n.]  “Conversely, they also note that pagan tradition reversed not the place, but the mortal status, of this zone, by noting that for the Stoics, the above of the blessed was “under the moon,” citing the early Christian writer Tertullian’s De Anima, ch. 54. [p. 36, n.]”

From here, Farrell sinks his teeth into this abstruse issue further:

“Note now what we have:

1.  A clear reference to a “quarantine” zone, which is defined by,
2.  A clear defined astronomical (and hence identifiable) natural boundary in space, one that is moreover
3.  A natural base of operations for anyone intent upon the long-term observation of humanity and planet Earth and its compliance with any “cosmic Versailles” treaty, and which being ready to hand,
4.  Might explain the sudden spike in UFO interest and interference in human nuclear and thermonuclear weapon systems during and after WWII; and finally,
5.  Clear indication that there are two surviving elites of this “cosmic war” both near and on planet Earth, and that human scholars are exemplified in Morfill and Charles are aware of this story.”

Ultimately [subsequent slide]: “what might all of this mean for the national security state / breakaway civilization studying such texts, and the parallels between them and modern history and UFO-associated phenomena?  What are the implications for a “secret space program”?

1.  The indications in some texts of a “quarantine” zone in local celestial space, a zone defined by clear astronomical boundaries such as the orbit of the Moon or any other local celestial body, may indicate that human presence in or beyond the zone could be interpreted as an act of war or a violation of the stipulation of some lost “cosmic Versailles” treaty. And thus, as a safeguard, it will be necessary to ensure that human presence in space is not misinterpreted.  This can be done by putting official notices on space probes, such as the Lunar Excursion Module of the Apollo program, that humanity is “coming in peace for all mankind:” [Italic emphasis in original]

Thereafter,  Farrell implores, “Who’s the message addressed to?  Why would they have suspected or insisted upon putting a message like that?  Was it just to put a monument up there on the moon?  Or was there another reason operative in placing these little notices on those early space probes?  What I’m suggesting is of course there was another reason for it.”  [Bold emphasis added]

[Next slide]

“2.  The Re-Militarization of the Rhineland/Quarantine Zone”: As international human commerce becomes increasingly reliant upon space-based assets for financial clearing and, in the not-too-distant future, space mining, it will be necessary and essential to protect those assets from any outside interference or prediction, human or otherwise, and this implies the basing of weapons in the “quarantine zone”.  This will in turn require, as I indicated at last year’s conference, demonstrations -space-gun-boat diplomacy – by humanity to “whomever” that it has acquired a rudimentary capability of engineering systems of planetary and possibly stellar scales [the “Farrell Corollaries to the Kardashev Classification system] for potential weaponization, and the achievement or parity or near-parity with the ability to emulate UFO technical performance.

“3.  These demonstrations might be intended to force a “renegotiation” of the “tribute/sacrifice” component of any “cosmic Versailles” as might have been put into place in High Antiquity, particularly since it will not be lost upon the technocrats and oligarchs of any such breakaway civilization/secret space program that with the advent of Christianity and its influence over a significant portion of the world, that the payments of sacrifice ceased completely [implying that sacrifices were simply seized and performed anyway by other intelligences, ala the Ruhr occupation of 1923].  This renegotiation might have taken the form of financial or commodities payment of some sort, a point which clear analytical implications for the current state of the global economy; [Italic emphasis in the original]

“4.  The clear implications of a “Cosmic Versailles” are also that (a) elites from both sides of the conflict survived; and (b) that the first stage of the conflict was over, leading to the possibility of a second and renewed stage in the future.  Given that the “Versailles” template or model dictates not only that some “quarantine” zone was instituted in local celestial space but also that some monitoring or espionage project was established in order to ensure compliance with that “treaty” [especially in the matters of reparations and non-development of certain technologies], any program of technological emulation of UFOs must be accompanied by a “counter-espionage” program to identify and mislead any “watchers”.  Such a program would depend on (a) a massive surveillance program and (b) the acquisition of a massive genome/DNA database to identify those with “non-Human” but humanoid genetic signatures, our “genetic cousins.” (Think “” and other such sites) [Italic emphasis in the original, bold emphasis added]

Farrell gives us another tidbit to ponder, “In my book The Cosmic War, I recount this war from a lot of different ancient texts, there is something I began to notice about these ancient tablets of destiny, these ancient technologies of mass destruction.  I think they were biometrically activated.  You had to have the right retina scan.  You had to have the right DNA, otherwise they wouldn’t work.  That’s why only the ‘gods’ could possess them.  And if you suspect all that, and if you’re invading a bunch of middle eastern countries, to collect artifacts, not just oil, you’re going to start looking for it.  And the only way to do that is through a massive surveillance program coupled with biometric databases.  Guess what the FBI wants to do right now? ”

“5.  Since the ancient texts – particularly the Mesopotamian and Greek traditions – indicate a “cosmic war” in our own celestial neighborhood, with Nergal/Herrakles/Hercules/Aries[Mars], Chronos[Saturn], Tiamat (the mising exploded planet), the Moon, and the Sun being involved, the possibility exists that remnants of the technology – including those weapons technologies such as the “Elel” stone of the Epic Of Ninurta – might rest or be recoverable on those planets.  As such, which the public message placards on human space probes might indicate “we come in peace”, the possibility exists that a covert purpose for the exploration of those bodies and for the recovery and analysis of those alleged ancient military technologies is in play.

Finalizing, the final slide follows:

“I believe that it is evident from the behavior of technocrats concerned with monitoring space an UFO affairs, from the concern to secure human thermonuclear weapon systems and space systems against UFO interference, to the indicators of the development of hidden technologies and energy systems [Secrets of Antigravity Propulsion by Paul LaViolette Ph.D. is as far as I’m concerned the textbook on the thinking and technologies that are out there in the public record], to the development of a massive surveillance state, rapid on-the-spot DNA sequencing technologies, to the sending of message on human space probes reassuring “whomever” of our peaceful intentions, that it becomes clear that such patters and policies themselves corroborate the possible existence of the “Versailles model” as a template for policy-makers of the breakaway civilization/national security group and that this template has indeed informed and influenced the behavior of that group, especially as regards to the possibility of covert “space exploration and rearmaments program.”

And that my friends, is not all she wrote.

The plot thickens quickens.

Concerns About CERN & The Collider Race: China’s Bigger Better…

Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
May 31, 2016

This article was shared by Mr. V.T., and I’ve simply got to blog about it, given all the concerns about CERN’s large hadron collider:

Archives Profile Subscribe “Cosmic Leapfrog” –Will China’s Enormous ‘Super Collider’ Reveal Unknowns of the Universe? (A ‘Galaxy’ Insight)

So what’s the conCERN here? Where’s the high octane speculation? China wants to build a bigger better version of CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, so what?

In my book, The Third Way, I called CERN’s LHC a “cosmology cartel”, for the simple philosophical reason that it was a monopoly on cosmological-quantum mechanical science; there was no way to independently check its results unless one built a similar or larger collider, and hence, “big science” had marched itself into a philosophical corner: how would one duplicate results and confirm an experiment independently of the CERN Cartel itself? The question assumes some importance since CERN claims to have found the Higgs boson, the so-called “God-particle” that, in the standard theory, is responsible for imparting mass. Some, though not many, have questioned the result, thus casting a faint but palpable pall over its scientific ukases.

The only way to combat and verify such a priesthood is to have your own collider, and reperform the same experiments, which China wants to do.

Continue Reading At:


Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

[Book Review] The Nazi International – The Nazis’ Postwar Plan To Control Finance, Conflict, Phsyics & Space By Dr. Joseph P. Farrell


Zy Marquiez
April 11, 2016

The Nazi International – The Nazi’s Postwar Plan To Control Finance, Conflict, Physics And Space by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, is essentially the prequel to his latest endeavour, The Third Way – The Nazi International, The European Union & Corporate Fascism.

Farrell’s book series usually come in trilogies, and although as mentioned this isn’t the prequel, it sure follows suit similar to how his previous trilogies would build on each other.

If you’ve read Farrell’s latest book, The Third Way, then you will want to read this book to be able to further delve into the inner workings of the Nazi mindset, and how they were able to accomplish what they did.  And even if you haven’t, this is a great starting place from which to branch out into Farrell’s many other books which talk about the many aspects of the Nazis that most people are unknowledgeable about.

Moving on, Farrell gives a top-down lengthy synopsis into a sizeable breath of the Nazi’s post-WWII war machine.

Farrell begins by noting what he’s mentioned in countless interviews, which is that the military of Germany – the Nazis – did not surrenderThat alone is an excellent foundation to the notion that the Nazi’s weren’t ones to roll over and die as many would have you believe.  A small, but notable data point, because it extends further into the future.  All the way into the present, in fact.  In contrast, the Japanese surrendered in WWII was very neatly accomplished.

From there, the author continues with various examinations into the Nazi connection with corporations, spearheaded by the notorious I.G. Farben and its penetration of big banks, to the growth of the Nazi postwar network lead by Bormann.  In conjunction with that, Farrell lays down many of the intricacies that allowed the Nazis not only to survive in a post-WW2 environment, but to actually thrive.  That is a rather disturbing prospect indeed.

Another notable component that goes oft-overlooked is the analysis of Hitler’s alleged death.  Many people take it a face value that he committed ‘suicide’.  Farrell notes many of the points that are pointed out in a particular article which helps him sift through and narrow down what the probable truth might have been.  That is rather intriguing as it would literally change history in more ways than people could imagine.

The Nazis surviving in a post-WWII establishment is a bold, but truthful claim.  But the possibility of the boss – the very Nazi symbolalso making it through?  Now that will make some folks’ head spin.

Not only is Hitler addressed, but his second in command, Martin Bormann is also all over this book.

Other quite notable components of the story are the Vatican’s connection to the Nazi ratlines, Argentina’s connection to the Nazis before and after the war, as well as how key individuals like Allen Dulles’ are involved in this whole ordeal.

Farrell from there does a compelling job of addressing what the actual postwar Nazi plans were, many of which serve not only to enrich them, but which helped further their power structure.

Another very incisive, and oft-overlooked component in Farrell’s research is the fact that the Nazis played an integral role in the Muslim world.  This arguably has probably continued to this day, which is quite distressing.  If such is the case, the whole Muslims-are-terrorist meme needs to be examined with precision, because behind the scenes much of what seems to be one element, might just be another.   The surge of terrorism that has ensued since must be questioned given how much it has served to fracture how the US is seen in the world, how much profits the military industrial complex has achieved, and how much control over the region has been established in the Middle East and beyond.  That’s not to say people are not responsible for their own actions.  However, who drives those actions is just as, if not more important because that would be the root cause, rather than one addressing the symptom by only focusing on Muslims.

In any case, Farrell furthers his research by addressing technological components the Nazis were working on such as the notorious Bell, while also examining NASA’S secret history in connection to his thesis.

This book will make the reader see history from a few different lenses, much different than what conventional historians would have you even consider.

Mainstream history must fit in a box, especially since the lot of it is manufactured by the victors.

Anything that doesn’t fit in the box, anything that questions official records, anything that makes one think deeply about different possibilities helps fracture conventional narratives and bring about a wider scope of transformation.  This book serves to do just that.

This book is the microscope from which to view post-WW2 Nazi machinations, and it does it in a way that’s sound, breathtaking and yet intriguing.  That alone is worth the price of the book.

But when you couple all of the above to the fact that people with the same Nazi-like mindset are still around [think of the Bushes, and the many corporate connections in America that took place during WW2 for starters] and share the same ideals et al., it makes it vital for individuals to know what’s going on, which makes this book much more important.

Secrets Of The Third Reich [Part 2 of 2] – A Conversation With Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

How was the Third Reich connected to Foo Fighters, flying discs & Antarctica? Where did the Nazi Bell go? How is the Rudolf Hess mystery connected to Antarctica? Did the Kammler Stab survive? What’s the significance of 1947? Dr. Farrell continues his report on this and related topics, as Mercury in relation to plasma & field propulsion technology & many other obscurities… plus he talks about his new book [The Third Way], with a short obituary of George-Ann Hughes of the Byte Show.