Has Snopes Been Snoped? Will Retraction Watch Retract?

Has Snopes Been Snoped? Will Retraction Watch Retract?
Source: GreenMedInfo.com
Celeste McGovern
May 22, 2017

Originally published on CMSRI.org.

The NEVER-retracted vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study that revealed significantly higher odds in risks of chronic illness among vaccinated children is back online. But will Retraction Watch admit it launched the attack to discredit it? Will Snopes fact-check itself? If not, why not?

The first-ever study of vaccinated vs. unvaccinated American children (and a subset study) published two weeks ago in the peer-reviewed Journal of Translational Science have reappeared online after briefly disappearing while under fire from a small band of Skeptics and the staff at Retraction Watch, an organization that reports Science retraction news. Snopes, the fact-checking website, is still misreporting that the study has been retracted, even while it sits, published, in the science journal’s pages.

It is a troubling saga unfolding in the scientific publishing world, and it is worth paying attention to because it’s revealing of powerful forces in that realm that are trying to censor scientific research and to shield important data from public viewing. Not at all the methodical and logical sort of thing you would expect from modern scientific types.  It looks more like a secret 17th century Salem witch trial…interrupted.

Most readers here will be aware of Anthony Mawson et al.’s pivotal pilot study on the health of homeschooled American children. It is one of very few studies to examine the explosion of once rare disorders and conditions affecting modern children (all the millions of 21st century First World earaches, allergies, hayfever, ADD, neurodevelopmental disorders and autism, that is damaging young children’s brains in spiking numbers). And it is the only study (yes, the ONLY study to contain totally unvaccinated American subjects.) There are no other studies of American children who have never had a vaccine compared to kids with the motherload of CDC protection.

The researchers cautiously asked a logical, but unorthodox question: is it possible that all this immune –mediated disease has anything to do with the immune-mediating drugs that children are given in doses five times that of their parents?   (And yes, autism is brain damage but it is almost certainly the result of a damaged immune system). Could it have anything to do with the 50 doses of 15 immune-stimulating vaccines before age six compared to the three doses of three vaccines the last generation — that wasn’t so sick — got?

The researchers got some very troubling answers. They reported Odds Risk ratios similar to smoking and lung cancer for vaccination and immune-mediated allergic rhinitis, for example.  And a more than four-fold higher risk of vaccinated children having been diagnosed on the Autism Spectrum than unvaccinated children. We better have another study, the researchers concluded. A bigger and better study.

Round One: Suppressing the Study Results

Enter the Skeptics. When the Mawson paper was under review at Frontiers last year, a Skeptic named Leonid Schneider leapt into action.

“I pride myself to have caused the Frontiers anti-vaxx retraction with one tweet!” he tweeted. “The anti-vaxx paper was published as abstract, a reader alerted me, I tweeted, Frontiers got scared, pulled the paper.” Before it was published. It was never published. NEVER RETRACTED. Just tweeted away by Leonid and his Skeptic friends.

Most scientists are skeptical — they don’t like claims without evidence – but not all scientists are Skeptics. Skeptics are champions of objective scientific inquiry who fight against anything they see as irrational and unscientific, which is everything outside of pharmaceutical manufacturing interests. Functional Medicine is equal to Bigfoot to them.  They know the difference between Good Thinking and Bad Thinking and some theories (like evolution) they think are very good and some ideas, like God, are particularly bad. They don’t like religion, but Skeptics can be quite dogmatic themselves about some things. Like vaccines. According to them, all vaccines are safe and effective. No one is ever injured by vaccines. Every child is healthier because of vaccines. The epidemic of childhood disorders is caused by something that is not vaccines. Questioning vaccines is heresy.

Retraction Watch, which bills itself as “a window into the scientific process,” got a little more involved than window-watching and inaccurately reported that the study was retracted, based on a Tweet. It ignored that accepting science on its merits, and then rejecting it on Tweets from those who disagree, is in violation of the publishing code of conduct.  Not to mention that there is a big difference in the world of science between having a paper retracted – which implies scientific misconduct or gross scientific error – and having a paper declined because of disgruntled Tweets.

Frontiers publicly posts their retraction policy and affirms that they abide by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and recommendations in cases of potential retraction. Frontiers also abides by two other key principles, as recommended by COPE:

  • Retractions are not about punishing authors.
  • Retraction statements should be public and linked to the original, retracted article.

There was no retraction statement ever made or posted by Frontiers; therefore Retraction Watch’s statement about Dr. Mawson’s paper being retracted is inarguably false. This proven lie was used to interfere with and misconstrue Dr. Mawson’s research, resulting in a temporary removal of his article from The Journal of Translational Science pending an inquiry. Inquiry resolved, the articles have been reinstated on the journal’s website, demonstrating sufficient proof that the articles were never retracted as claimed by Retraction Watch.

Round Two: Discrediting the Study Results

Retraction Watch was again the first to misreport the retraction of the Mawson paper from the Journal of Translational Science last week. Rather than reporting on the facts, Retraction Watch took an activist role in the attempted takedown of Dr. Mawson’s research. Misconstruing and misrepresenting another scientist’s research is considered scientific misconduct. Retraction Watch still has (at the time of writing) an article posted that claims the paper has been doubly retracted. Their actions have a ripple effect, furthering the harm to Dr. Mawson and his younger colleagues, actions which are harmful to reputations, careers, and their future livelihoods. Snopes, the “fact-checking” entity, was still reporting that the papers were retracted because of methodological flaws, with only a tiny disclaimer at the bottom showing the papers restored to the Journal’s webpages. I pointed out the error to the editors and they updated the story today, without apology for inaccuracies.

Continuing to retain articles that are demonstrably and provably false on their website shows a lack of regard for the integrity and truth they espouse to protect. The public should be aware that their representations are not well researched and supported by the facts, and that the due diligence they claim to conduct in the interest of scientific integrity is not as it appears once you scratch the surface.

No answers have been forthcoming from Retraction Watch’s editor Alison Cook. She has not replied to my inquiries. Snopes founder David Mikkelson and managing editor Brooke Binkowski did not reply to messages. I did not receive explanations from the journal editors either.

The Digital Media Law Project publishes guidelines for publishing information that “harms the reputation of another person, group, or organization.” Injury to one’s reputation that stems from a falsehood is defamation, and claiming an article was retracted when it wasn’t is false, defamatory and should be corrected when notice and evidence has been provided to the author of the defamatory article. In the case of the Snopes article, the DMLP states “the republication of someone else’s words can itself be defamatory. In other words, you won’t be immune simply because you are quoting another person making the defamatory statement, even if you properly attribute the statement to its source.”

The DMLP also advises publications to “be prompt and give your correction the same prominent position that you gave the inaccurate information you previously posted.”

Can Snopes and Retraction Watch be Trusted? 

The whole ordeal puts scientific publishing into a bad light. Can it be so easy to push editors out of publishing? Is the code of conduct meaningless? Don’t the researchers have recourse to defend their work if there are allegations against it, in a scholarly manner? Has science stooped so low, so beneath accepted standards of professionalism, that it is time to call in lawyers?

This disturbing event leaves the public bewildered. Is there something to worry about for our children’s health or not? Why did these researchers find such a high risk of autism and other disorders in vaccinated children?  What are the possible mechanisms of immune system injury from vaccination in children?

The way the Mawson study was received undermines public trust in a system that is meant to be seeking better health for humanity. It will continue to erode so long as it fails to answer these questions that our children need answers to, now.

Read More At: GreenMedInfo.com
___________________________________________________________

The Children’s Medical Safety Research Institute (CMSRI) is a medical and scientific collaborative established to provide research funding for independent studies on causal factors underlying the chronic disease and disability epidemic.

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.

iHealth News: Pet Studies & Child Health | Yoga | Nutrition & More

Source: iHealthTube.com
April 14, 2017

Can you eat your way to a healthy blood pressure? Find out what foods can help. Also learn about the benefits of having a pet for your infant and what benefits yoga is now showing for a certain group of men!

Why Aren’t More Doctors Like THIS?

Source: iHealthTube.com
Dr. Michael Farely | Ty M. Bollinger
June 26, 2016

Dr. Michael Farley shares a couple of stories with doctors he’s worked with that might be outside what many of us consider the norm. Find out how. You’ll be surprised at how much doctors don’t learn and know and what areas they know very little about when they become doctors. Watch the video and you’ll wonder, why aren’t more doctors like this?!

The Fluoride Wars: Loving Cancer, Loving Lower IQ


NoMoreFakeNews.com

Jon Rappoport
April 26, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)

It’s no surprise that the US government would look the other way when lower IQ and cancer are business as usual.

One of the major agencies that would look the other way is the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

—But suppose scientists within the EPA spoke out, revolted, and issued official rebukes to their own Agency’s position on fluorides?

Talk about cognitive dissonance. Contradiction. “We at the EPA know fluorides are wonderful and safe and beautiful. Of course, our own scientists disagree. Strongly. But don’t worry, we’re ignoring them. And we’re keeping their statements out of the press. Our position on fluorides is administrative. It has nothing to do with science. Anyway, we support cancer and plummeting IQ. They’re wonderful.”

Case in point, going back 17 years. Buckle up. Here is what the EPA Union of scientists had to say about fluoridation:

Quoting from a May 1, 1999, statement— “Why EPA’s Headquarters Union of Scientists Opposes Fluoridation”—written by William Hirzy, PhD, [Union of Scientists] Senior Vice-President, Chapter 280:

“…our opposition to drinking water fluoridation has grown, based on the scientific literature documenting the increasingly out-of-control exposures to fluoride, the lack of benefit to dental health from ingestion of fluoride and the hazards to human health from such ingestion. These hazards include acute toxic hazard, such as to people with impaired kidney function, as well as chronic toxic hazards of gene mutations, cancer, reproductive effects, neurotoxicity, bone pathology and dental fluorosis.”

“In support of this concern are results from two epidemiology studies from China that show decreases in I.Q. in children who get more fluoride than the control groups of children in each study. These decreases are about 5 to 10 I.Q. points in children aged 8 to 13 years.”

“Another troubling brain effect has recently surfaced: fluoride’s interference with the function of the brain’s pineal gland. The pineal gland produces melatonin which, among other roles, mediates the body’s internal clock, doing such things as governing the onset of puberty. Jennifer Luke has shown that fluoride accumulates in the pineal gland and inhibits its production of melatonin. She showed in test animals that this inhibition causes an earlier onset of sexual maturity, an effect reported in humans as well in 1956…”

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com

——————————————————————————-

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Study Suggests We Patients be Able to Predict Illness Better than Doctors

medical-self-diagnosis-doctor-735-350

Source: NaturalSociety.com
Julie Fidler
January 8, 2016

My mother never goes to the doctor for a diagnosis; she diagnoses herself, tells the doctor what’s wrong with her, and he treats her for it.

…And she’s never wrong. I mean never.

A recent study backs up my mother’s theory (and she’s not alone in that theory) that since people know their own bodies better than anyone else ever could, sometimes you have to tell the doctor he’s wrong.

Carnegie Mellon University psychologists asked 360 healthy adults age 18 to 55 to complete a basic self-assessment to determine whether how they rated their health could predict their risk of getting a cold. [1]

“We wanted to examine whether self-rated health predicted effective immune response in younger adults selected for their good health and whether this association was dependent on health practices and socioemotional factors,” he said in a university news release.

The results of the assessments accurately predicted participants’ susceptibility to one of the most miserable “common” ailments out there.

The psychologists concluded that doctors might benefit from asking patients to rate their own health.

“Poor self-ratings of health have been found to predict poor health trajectories in older adults, including an increased risk for mortality,” said study leader Sheldon Cohen, a professor of psychology at the university.

That link remains significant even after accounting for the effects of objective indicators of health like physical examinations, medical records, and hospitalizations.

Researchers also found the results were true even when accounting for differences across “age, sex, race, pre-challenge immunity…body mass, season, education, and income.”

The participants – clearly all good sports – were exposed to a cold virus and monitored for 5 days after filling out the survey. About one-third of them got sick. Individuals who rated their health as fair, good, or very good were more than twice as likely to develop a cold as participants who said their health was excellent. None of them rated their health as poor.

The study found no cause-and-effect link between how people rate their health and risk of a cold or any other illness, but Cohen suggested the association could be due to “subtle sensations, feelings or symptoms that signal immune system problems.”

Continue Reading At: NaturalSociety.com

What Is Part Of The [Establishment] Plan?

By: Zy Marquiez
January 4, 2016

Pondering quite a bit upon a recent conversation with a friend of mine, we delved into things that are obviously a plan of the comptrollers, and some events that are not.

Things that are ‘part of the plan’ as the Joker [Heath Ledger] famously joked in the second modern Batman reboot, are things/issues that society as a whole has gotten used to, for various reasons.

Things that aren’t part of the plan, are things that throw a wrench into the ‘official’ reality, so to speak.

Here’s that starkly grim and yet illuminating quote:

“You know what I noticed? Nobody panics when things go “according to plan.” Even if the plan is horrifying! If, tomorrow, I tell the press that, like a gang banger will get shot, or a truck load of soldiers will be blown up, nobody panics, because it’s all “part of the plan”. But when I say that one little old mayor will die, well then everyone loses their minds!”
– Joker

The clip below elucidates this best.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0AXgaFqEas

With that said, am not by any means advocating that people should do anything to any mayors, people in power, or anything of the like.  Was just using the notion behind that particular scene to show how reality ultimately operates.

The plan is what society expects based on what the duplicitous media/establishment/corporations expounds. If society expects a certain thing to happen, be it organic, or engineered, then its ‘part of the plan.’ But if society doesn’t expect a certain event to take place, then that’s not part of the plan, but also usually ends up in people’s ‘moral compass’ coming off the hinges in a myriad of ways because their carefully orchestrated reality [illusion] just got shattered.

The careful management of illusion is why so many vital topics of utmost importance are not talked about within the duplicitous mainstream media circles.

Rummaging further, we can gather that although the above line was said in a fictionary world, we must remember that in America everything is backwards.

“In America fact is fiction and fiction is fact”, as former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Catherine Austin Fitts says regularly. This is because Hollywood elucidates quite clearly how our reality operates much more than most realize or care to ponder.

How do we know what is part of the plan by the comptrollers?   By sifting for evidence that show us the unfortunate circumstances.

Here are some notable examples:

Not allowing people to have organic, real salmon is part of the plan.

– Not having mainstream media presstitutes talking about fake grassroots movements funded by Corporations, also known as astroturfing is part of the plan.

– Not discussing countless studies of vaccinations [80+ studies outlining some of the dangers of vaccinations] that blow a hole into the mainstream media & establishment narrative the size of cape cod is part of the plan.

– Not discussing Geoengineering information that is pertinent to our every day health, and to our knowledge of our current environment is part of the plan.

Not having actual Presidential debates of substance like they used to have in times past is part of the plan.

– Not discussing cannabis’ benefits with certain diseases. There are countless diseases cannabis benefits for what its worth.  Look it up.

– Not discussing the work of Dr. Burzynski, which happens to have come up with an effective way in dealing with some cancers, and yet this isn’t discussed in the mainstream at all.

– Not discussing the dangers that fluoride poses in when its added to water. Not only water fluoridation failed modern civilization [as if it could really succeed], but its been rejected by place after place after place.

Not addressing findings that throw a wrench into the official history of The Great Pyramid is part of the plan.

– And finally, not discussing how the mainstream media manipulation machine is spearheaded by six media conglomerates, how their viewer numbers are declining & how they’ve been caught lying about stories is part of the plan.

Keep in mind that, you returning to your regularly scheduled programming, is also part of the plan.

Now the open-minded, skeptic, incisive, BS-detecting, relentlessly researching, [un]common sense individual though? That’s not part of their plan.

You going to follow their plan?   Or you going to create your own?

The choice is yours.

—————————————————–

Sources:
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/11/30/mainstream-media-manipulation-propaganda/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/19/analyzing-human-action-in-america-everything-is-backwards/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/11/shocking-news-fda-approves-genetically-engineered-salmon/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/11/shocking-news-fda-approves-genetically-engineered-salmon/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/07/sharyl-attkisson-astroturf-manipulation-of-media-messages/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/14/80-studies-outlining-some-of-the-dangers-of-vaccinations/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/18/geoengineering-disinformation-battling-climate-engineering-deniers-on-national-radio/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/18/republican-presidential-debate-an-exercise-in-mind-control/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/18/cannabis-superior-to-drugs-for-inflammatory-bowel-condition-crohns-disease/
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/05/burzynski-cancer-is-big-business-documentary/
http://www.naturalnews.com/038949_water_fluoridation_failure_toxic_chemicals.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/040465_water_fluoridation_Portland_ballot_measure.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/035352_safe_water_fluoridation_Indiana.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/033496_Philadelphia_water_fluoridation.html
https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/11/scientists-geological-evidence-shows-the-great-sphinx-is-800000-years-old/
http://www.activistpost.com/2015/08/the-illusion-of-choice-90-of-american-media-controlled-by-6-corporations.html

 

Study Calls Into Question Primary Justification for Vaccines

Study Calls Into Question Primary Justification for Vaccines

Source: GreenMedInfo.com
By: Sayer Ji, Founder

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), “Immunity to a disease is achieved through the presence of antibodies to that disease in a person’s system.”[i] This, in fact, is the main justification for using vaccines to “boost” immunity, and a primary focus of vaccine research and development.

And yet, newly published research has revealed that in some cases no antibodies are required for immunity against some viruses.

Published in the journal Immunity in March, 2011, and titled, “B cell maintenance of subcapsular sinus macrophages protects against a fatal viral infection independent of adaptive immunity,” researchers found that mice infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) can suffer fatal invasion of their central nervous system even in the presence of high concentrations of “neutralizing” antibodies against VSV.[ii]

The researchers found that while B-cells were essential for surviving a systemic VSV infection through the modulation of innate immunity, specifically macrophage behavior, the antibodies they produce as part of the adaptive immune response were “neither needed nor sufficient for protection.”  These findings, according to the study authors, “…contradict the current view that B cell-derived neutralizing antibodies are absolutely required to survive a primary cytopathic viral infection, such as that caused by VSV.”

The discovery that antibodies are not required for protection against infection, while counterintuitive, is not novel. In fact, not only are antibodies not required for immunity, in some cases high levels are found in the presence of active, even lethal infections.  For example, high serum levels of antibodies against tetanus have been observed failing to confer protection against the disease.  A report from 1992 published in the journal Neurology found severe tetanus in immunized patients with high anti-tetanus titers, one of whom died as a result of the infection.[iii]

These research findings run diametrically opposed to currently held beliefs regarding the process by which we develop immunity against infectious challenges.  Presently, it is a commonly held view that during viral infections, innate immunity must activate adaptive responses in order to achieve effective immunity.  It is believed that this is why the immune system has developed a series of innate defenses, including complement, type I interferon, and other “stopgap measures,” which work immediately to lower pathogen burden and “buy time” for the much slower adaptive immune response to develop.

This view, however, has been called into question by the new study:  “Although this concept may apply to other viral infections, our findings with VSV turn this view upside down, indicating that during a primary infection with this cytopathic virus, innate immunity can be sterilizing without adaptive immune contributions.”

Does this strike a mortal blow to the antibody theory which underlies vaccinology, and constitutes the primary justification for the CDC’s focus on using vaccines to “boost” immunity?

Indeed, in vaccinology, which is the science or method of vaccine development, vaccine effectiveness is often determined by the ability of a vaccine to increase antibody titers, even if this does not translate into real-world effectiveness, i.e. antibody-antigen matching.  In fact, regulatory agencies, such as the FDA, often approve vaccines based on their ability to raise antibody titers, also known as “vaccine efficacy,” without requiring proof of vaccine effectiveness, as would seem logical.

The obvious problem with these criteria is that the use of vaccine adjuvants like mercury, aluminum hydroxide, mineral oil, etc.  – all of which are intrinsically toxic substances — will increase antibody titers, without guaranteeing  they will neutralize the targeted antigen, i.e. antibody-antigen affinity.   To the contrary, many of these antibodies lack selectivity, and target self-structures, resulting in the loss of self-tolerance, i.e. autoimmunity.

Continue Reading At: GreenMedInfo.com

80+ Studies Outlining Some Of The Dangers Of Vaccinations

Image Source: RevolutionOfTheMind.org

TheBreakaway
By: Zy Marquiez
December 14, 2015

[Editor’s Note]

Below follow a diverse set of studies that detail some of the dangers in vaccinations.

The information was found at LearnTheRisk.org

Although most of the links as of this date are currently working, a handful of links below do not work.  The links that do not work have strikethroughs running through them.  In many cases, was able to find another link that provides the same information, and that particular link is shown below the one that didn’t work.   This is so any person gathering data is still able to find said information and sift through it as needed.

If the title of the study has a strikethrough through it, then the information is not provided any longer.  The link/data is still shown in order to show the educated reader that there was at one point data in said link, but it has been erased/moved for whatever reason.  Hope that helps.
————————————————————–

Studies on the Dangers of Vaccine Ingredients:

Adverse events following immunization with vaccines containing adjuvants. Immunol Res, 2013

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23576057

Investigating Viruses in Cells Used to Make Vaccines; and Evaluating the Potential Threat Posed by Transmission of Viruses to Humans FDA.gov

http://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/scienceresearch/biologicsresearchareas/ucm127327.htm

Dangers of Aluminum Studies:

Administration of aluminium to neonatal mice in vaccine relevant amounts is associated with adverse long term neurological outcomes. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2013

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23932735

Aluminum adjuvant linked to gulf war illness induces motor neuron death in mice. Neuromolecular Medicine, 2007

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114826

Aluminum and Alzheimer’s disease: after a century of controversy, is there a plausible link? Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157018

Aluminium and breast cancer: Sources of exposure, tissue measurements and mechanisms of toxicological actions on breast biology Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2013

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013413001608%20

Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2010

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2819810/?tool=pubmed

Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are They Safe? Current Medical Chemistry, 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/21568886/

Elevated brain aluminium and early onset Alzheimer’s disease in an individual occupationally exposed to aluminium: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports, 2014

http://www.jmedicalcasereports.com/content/8/1/41

Mechanisms of aluminum adjuvant toxicity and autoimmunity in pediatric populations. Lupus. 2012

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235057

Dangers of Aborted Fetal Tissue Studies:

Danger of Fetal Tissue in Vaccines. Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute, September 2014

http://s3.amazonaws.com/soundchoice/soundchoice/wpcontent/uploads/SCPIADvaccinewebsite.pdf

Dangers of Polio Vaccine and Cancer Studies:

Medulloblastoma in childhood: an epidemiological study. Journal of Neurosurgery, 1984

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6470775?dopt=Abstract

Poliovirus Vaccination during Pregnancy, Maternal Seroconversion to Simian Virus 40, and Risk of Childhood Cancer. Oxford Journals Medicine & Health American Journal of Epidemiology

http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/160/4/306.abstract

Simian Virus 40 Infection of Humans. Journal of Virology

http://jvi.asm.org/content/77/9/5039.full

Dangers of Chickenpox Vaccine:

Review of the United States universal varicella vaccination program: Herpes zoster incidence rates, costeffectiveness, and vaccine efficacy based primarily on the Antelope Valley Varicella Active Surveillance Project data. Vaccine, 2013

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22659447

Dangers of Hepatitis B Vaccine:

Autoimmune hazards of hepatitis B vaccine. Autoimmun Rev, 2005

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15722255

Hepatitis B triple series vaccine and developmental disability in US children aged 19 years. Journal Toxicological & Environmental Chemistry, 2008

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02772240701806501#preview

Hepatitis B vaccine induces apoptotic death in Hepa16 cells. Apoptosis, 2012

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22249285

Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis. Neurology Journal of the American Academy of Neurology, 2004

http://www.neurology.org/content/63/5/838.abstract

Rheumatic disorders developed after hepatitis B vaccination. Oxford Journals Medicine & Health Rheumatology, 1999

http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/content/38/10/978.long

Dangers of Haemophilus B (HIB) Vaccine:

A causal association between Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine and diabetes. Autoimmunity, 2003

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12911277

Association between type 1 diabetes and Hib vaccine. British Medical Journal, 1999

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1116914/

Dangers of Thimerosal Studies:

Administration of thimerosal to infant rats increases overflow of glutamate and aspartate in the prefrontal cortex: protective role of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. Neurochem Res. 2012

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22015977

Comparison of Blood and Brain Mercury Levels in Infant Monkeys Exposed to Methylmercury or Vaccines Containing Thimerosal. Environmental Health Perspectives, August 2005

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16079072

Integrating experimental (in vitro and in vivo) neurotoxicity studies of lowdose thimerosal relevant to vaccines. Neurochem Res. 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21350943

Lasting neuropathological changes in rat brain after intermittent neonatal administration of thimerosal. Folia Neuropathology, 2010

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21225508

Maternal thimerosal exposure results in aberrant cerebellar oxidative stress, thyroid hormone metabolism, and motor behavior in rat pups; sex and strain dependent effects. Cerebellum. 2012

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22015705

Neonatal administration of thimerosal causes persistent changes in mu opioid receptors in the rat brain. Neurochem Res. 2010

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20803069

Neurodevelopmental disorders following thimerosal containing childhood immunizations: a followup analysis International Journal of Toxicology, 2004

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15764492

Persistent behavioral impairments and alterations of brain dopamine system after early postnatal administration of thimerosal in rats. Behav Brain Res, 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21549155

Thimerosal induces neuronal cell apoptosis by causing cytochrome c and apoptosisinducing factor release from mitochondria. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16273274

Thimerosal Exposure and the Role of Sulfation Chemistry and Thiol Availability in Autism Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013

www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph

Dangers of Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) Vaccine:

Nonfebrile Seizures after Mumps, Measles, Rubella, and Varicella Zoster Virus Combination Vaccination with Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Serum, Throat, and Urine.  Clinical and Vaccine Immuniology, 2013

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3697452/

Two successive outbreaks of mumps in Nova Scotia among vaccinated adolescents and young adults. CMAJ, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16940266

Waning of Maternal Antibodies Against Measles, Mumps, Rubella, and Varicella in Communities With Contrasting Vaccination Coverage. Oxford Journals Medicine & Health The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2013

http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/04/29/infdis.jit143.full

Mumps vaccination coverage and vaccine effectiveness in a large outbreak among college students–Iowa, 2006. Vaccine 2008

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18539365

Dangers of Pertussis (Whooping Cough) Vaccine:

FDA study helps provide an understanding of rising rates of whooping cough and response to vaccination. FDA Press Release, November 2013

http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm376937.htm

Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate model. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013

http://www.pnas.org/content/111/2/787.abstract

Effectiveness of pertussis vaccines for adolescents and adults: case control study British Medical Journal, 2013

http://www.bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f4249

Unexpectedly Limited Durability of Immunity Following Acellular Pertussis Vaccination in PreAdolescents in a North American Outbreak.  Oxford Journals Medicine & Health Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2012

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/03/13/cid.cis287.short

Author Insights: Protection From Pertussis Vaccine Wanes Over Time Journal of the American Medical Association, 2012

http://newsatjama.jama.com/2012/11/27/authorinsightsprotectionfrompertussisvaccinewanesovertime/
http://healthland.time.com/2012/11/29/protection-from-whooping-cough-vaccine-wanes-over-time/

Whooping Cough Outbreaks Among Fully Vaccinated. Office of Medical and Scientific Justice, 2012

http://www.omsj.org/blogs/historicwhoopingcoughoutbreakhappeningamongthefullyvaccinated

Autoimmune Issues from Vaccines:

Evidence that Food Proteins in Vaccines Cause the Development of Food Allergies and It’s Implications for Vaccine Policy. Journal of Developing Drugs, 2015

http://www.omicsgroup.org/journals/evidence-that-food-proteins-in-vaccines-cause-the-development-of-foodallergies-and-its-implications-for-vaccine-policy
http://vaccinechoicecanada.com/in-the-news/evidence-that-food-proteins-in-vaccines-cause-the-development-of-food-allergies/

Click to access evidence-that-food-proteins-in-vaccines-cause-the-development-of-foodallergies-and-its-implications-for-vaccine-policy-2329-6631-1000137.pdf

Autoimmunity following hepatitis B vaccine as part of the spectrum of ‘Autoimmune (Auto-inflammatory) Syndrome induced by Adjuvants’ (ASIA): Analysis of 93 cases. NCBI, February 2012

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22235045

 

Vaccine Shedding Studies:

Cause of vaccine associated measles five weeks post immunization. British Columbia, Canada, 2013

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V18N49/art20649.pdf

Detection of measles virus RNA in urine specimens from vaccine recipients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 1995

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC228449/

Failure to reach the goal of measles elimination. Apparent paradox of measles infections in immunized persons. Arch Intern Med, 1994

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8053748

Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City. Oxford Journals, 2010

http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/02/27/cid.ciu105

Horizontal transmission of the Leningrad3 live attenuated mumps vaccine virus. Vaccine, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16266774

Transmission of mumps virus from mumps vaccinated individuals to close contacts Vaccine, 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21983359

Mumps vaccine virus transmission. Vopr Virusol, 2013

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24772647

Comparison of the Safety, Vaccine Virus Shedding, and Immunogenicity of Influenza Virus Vaccine, Trivalent, Types A and B, Live ColdAdapted, Administered to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infected and NonHIVInfected. Adults Oxford Journals Medicine & Health The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000

http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/181/2/725.full

Detection of fecal shedding of rotavirus vaccine in infants following their first dose of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine. Vaccine. 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477676

Rotavirus vaccines: viral shedding and risk of transmission. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18922486

Sibling Transmission of VaccineDerived Rotavirus (RotaTeq) Associated With Rotavirus Gastroenteritis. Pediatrics, 2010

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/125/2/e438

Pertussis Infection in Fully Vaccinated Children in DayCare Centers, Israel. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 2000

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627963/pdf/10998384.pdf

The Case against Universal Varicella Vaccination International Journal of Toxicology, 2006

http://www.whale.to/vaccines/goldman.pdf

Outbreak in Vaccinated NBC 4 New York, April 2014

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/HobokenCollegeCampusMumpsOutbreakFraternityMembers255738021.html

Link Between Vaccines and Autism Studies and News Stories:

Study: A Positive Association found between Autism Prevalence and Childhood Vaccination uptake across the U.S. Population. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21623535

Abnormal measlesmumpsrubella antibodies and CNS autoimmunity in children with autism. Journal of Biomedical Science, 2002

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12145534

Autism: A Brain Disorder, or A Disorder That Affects the Brain? Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 2005

http://www.clinicalneuropsychiatry.org/pdf/04_herbert.pdf

Blymphocytes from a Population of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Unaffected Siblings Exhibit Hypersensitivity to Thimerosal Journal of Toxicology, 2013

http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2013/801517/

Blood Levels of Mercury Are Related to Diagnosis of Autism: A Reanalysis of an Important Data Set Journal of Child Neurology, 2007

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18006963

California’s Autism Increase Not Due to Better Counting, Diagnosis Journal of Epidemiology, 2009 UC Davis Health System

http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/welcome/features/20090218_autism_environment/

Detection and sequencing of measles virus from peripheral mononuclear cells from patients with inflammatory bowel disease and autism. Dig Dis Science, 2000

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10759242

Developmental Regression and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Child With Autism Journal of Child Neurology, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16566887

Do aluminum vaccine adjuvants contribute to the rising prevalence of autism? Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22099159

Elevated levels of measles antibodies in children with autism. Pediatric Neurology, 2003

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12849883

Emperical Data Confirms Autism Symptoms Related to Aluminum and Acetominophen Exposure Entropy, 2012

http://www.mdpi.com/10994300/
http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/14/11/2227

Environmental mercury release, special education rates, and autism disorder: an ecological study of Texas Health Place, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16338635

Evidence of Toxicity, Oxidative Stress, and Neuronal Insult in Autism Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17090484

Hepatitis B vaccination of male neonates and autism diagnosis, NHIS 19972002. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 2010

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21058170

Hypothesis: conjugate vaccines may predispose children to autism spectrum disorders. Medical Hypotheses, 2011

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21993250

Study: Impact of environmental factors on the prevalence of autistic disorder after 1979 Journal of Public Health and Epidemiology, July 2014

http://www.ms.academicjournals.org/article/article1409245960_Deisher%20et%20al.pdf
http://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JPHE/article-abstract/C98151247042

Study: Measlesmumpsrubella vaccination timing and autism among young African American boys: a reanalysis of CDC data. Transl Neurodegener, 2014

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25114790

Study: Metabolic biomarkers of increased oxidative stress and impaired methylation capacity in children with autism American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2004

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15585776

Study: Neuroglial Activation and Neuroinflammation in the Brain of Patients with Autism Annals of Neurology, Feb 2005

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15546155

Study: Oxidative Stress in Autism: Elevated Cerebellar 3nitrotyrosine Levels American Journal of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2008

http://thescipub.com/PDF/ajbbsp.2008.73.84.pdf

Study: Porphyrinuria in childhood autistic disorder: Implications for environmental toxicity Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16782144

Study: Possible Immunological Disorders in Autism: Concomitant Autoimmunity and Immune Tolerance The Egyptian Journal of Immunology, 2006

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17974154

Study: Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children. International Journal of Toxicology, 2003

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933322

Study: Serological association of measles virus and human herpesvirus6 with brain autoantibodies in autism. Clin Immunol Immunopathol, 1998

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9756729

Study: Sorting out the spinning of autism: heavy metals and the question of incidence Acta Neurobiol Exp, 2010

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20628440

Study: Vaccines and Regressive Autism North American Journal of Medical Sciences, July 2009

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/#!po=4.09836

Study: Validation of the Phenomenon of Autistic Regression Using Home Videotapes Archives of General Psychiatry, 2005

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16061766

Study: What’s going on? The question of time trends in autism. Public Health Rep. 2004

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1497666/

Study: What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of multi systemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate neural temperature? North American Journal of Medical Science, 2009

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3364648/

News Report: CDC Admits Vaccines Can in Some Cases Trigger Autism

http://sharylattkisson.com/cdcpossibilitythatvaccinesrarelytriggerautism
https://sharylattkisson.com/cdc-possibility-that-vaccines-rarely-trigger-autism/

News Report: Where are The Autistic Amish? CBS Reporter Sharyl Attkisson, July 2014

http://sharylattkisson.com/wherearetheautisticamish/
https://sharylattkisson.com/where-are-the-autistic-amish/

Source: http://www.learntherisk.org/