Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated Pilot Study: Early Vaccination Sees Exponential Increase in Chronic Disorders

Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated Pilot Study: Early Vaccination Sees Exponential Increase in Chronic Disorders
Source: GreenMedInfo.com
Jefferey Jaxen
May 9, 2017

The move towards mandatory vaccination is no longer a conspiracy theory. California Senate Bill 277 snapped families into a reality where informed consent and health freedom do not apply.

Presently, the American people are facing 173 vaccine-related bills in 40 states. The language of many of the new bills aims to increase tracking, target non-vaccinating families, force vaccine schedules, and further persecute families who choose not to accept vaccines; the private products of for-profit, legally protected pharmaceutical companies. The corporate media and medical industries have thrown their full influence behind Big Pharma’s transparent ‘safe and effective’ messaging. At the same time, both industries are simultaneously censoring discussions around the fraud, dangers, mounting injuries, and criminal behavior inherent within the vaccine industry and those pushing for mandatory vaccination. A central point of contention, and human rights violation, is the fact that historically, no true study has been conducted between vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations. However, such a study has now come to fruition.

The Study

Having worked on the study for 15 years, from its original conception to completion, Dr. Anthony Mawson and his coauthors have now had their work published in the Journal of Translational Science.The study, titled, ‘Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year-old U.S. children’. [1] Since long-term health outcomes of the current vaccination schedule haven’t been studied, Dr. Mawson and his coauthors set out to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated children across a broad range of health outcomes. The study was designed as a cross-sectional survey of homeschooling mothers on their vaccinated and unvaccinated biological children ages 6 to 12. It included mothers of 666 children ranging from fully vaccinated, partially vaccinated and unvaccinated. The mothers were asked to indicate on a list of more than 40 acute and chronic illnesses all those for which her child or children had received a diagnosis by a physician among other questions.

The Results

The vaccinated children were significantly more likely than the unvaccinated to have been diagnosed with the following: allergic rhinitis, other allergies, eczema/atopic dermatitis, a learning disability, autism spectrum disorder, any neurodevelopmental disorder (NDD) (i.e., learning disability, ADHD or ASD) and chronic illness.

The following is a breakdown of the specific results for vaccinated children:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) was 4.7-fold higher in vaccinated children
  • ADHD risk was 4.7-fold higher
  • Learning disability risk was 3.7-fold higher 
  • Vaccinated children in the study were 3.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with some kind of (NDD).
  • Preterm birth and vaccination was associated with 6.6-fold increased odds of NDD

Vaccinated children were also significantly more likely to be diagnosed with an immune-related disorder. The risk of allergic rhinitis (commonly known as hay fever) was over 30 times higher in vaccinated children, while the risk of other allergies was increased 3.9 fold and the eczema risk was increased 2.4 fold.

The Conclusion 

Given the current global climate as described in this article’s introduction, the study highlighted three extremely noteworthy conclusions as follows:

  • “…the strength and consistency of the findings, the apparent “dose-response” relationship between vaccination status and several forms of chronic illness, and the significant association between vaccination and NDDs all support the possibility that some aspect of the current vaccination program could be contributing to risks of childhood morbidity.
  • Vaccination also remained significantly associated with neurodevelopmental disorders after controlling for other factors…”
  • “…preterm birth coupled with vaccination was associated with an apparent synergistic increase in the odds of neurodevelopmental disorder above that of vaccination alone.

While all three conclusions should be, and are, resonating deeply within the masses of health professionals and parents, the study’s third conclusion is especially timely and relevant beyond its stated assertion. Over the last year, numerous medical whistleblowers and scientific research papers have warned and demonstrated that routine vaccine injury to preterm infants in hospital neonatal intensive care units (NICU) is occurring. Whistleblower nurses Michelle Rowton James and Joanne [last name unavailable] publicly spotlighted how inhuman and commonplace NICU vaccine injury have rooted in the culture of establishment medicine. While three major studies [2],[3],[4] have corroborated the nurse’s whistleblowing admissions. Meanwhile, in April 2017 The Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK) released a statement asking for all Americans to join them in their call for a ban on vaccination of infants in the NICU. Speaking on the call to action Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, CEO, and Director of IPAK, stated:

We’ve asked the biomedical community to produce studies that show ill effect of vaccines on neonates, and they have not produced them.

There is currently a clash happening between religious-like vaccine dogma and increasingly aware segments of the public, research, and medical communities. In the balance hangs the opportunity for a truly open discussion on vaccines and a rare chance to reform a pharmaceutically-dominated medical community that has lost its way. Giving the current trend, the consequences of not seizing the opportunity for open dialogue appears to lead down a road of mandatory medicine and censorship of exponentially mounting human injury and mortality. Put simply, the battle now rages between openness and transparency versus the protection, through omission and overt censorship, of Big Pharma’s business model and need for ever-expanding bottom lines at all costs.

Read More At: GreenMedInfo.com
__________________________________________________________________________

REFERENCES:

[1] Anthony R Mawson, Brian D Ray, Azad R Bhuiyan, Binu Jacob (2017) Pilot comparative study on the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated 6- to 12- year old U.S children, Journal of Translational Science, DOI: 10.15761/JTS.1000186

[2] Sen S, Cloete Y, Hassan K, Buss P (2001) Adverse events following vaccination in premature infants, Acta Paediatrica, Aug;90(8):916-20.

[3] J  Bonhoeffer, C‐A Siegrist, and P T Heath (2006), Immunisation of premature infants, Archives of Disease in Childhood, Nov; 91(11): 929–935. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.086306

[4] Stephen D. DeMeo, Sudha R. Raman, Christoph P. Hornik, Catherine C. Wilson, Reese Clark, and P. Brian Smith, (2015), Adverse Events After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants, JAMA Pediatrics, 2015 Aug 1; 169(8): 740–745. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0418

Advertisements

Breaking: NVIC Tracking 134 Vaccine Bills Introduced in 35 States

A tidal wave of new bills has flooded 35 states in the U.S., threatening to either limit or completely eradicate vaccine exemptions. Clearly health freedom and informed consent is undergoing full frontal assualt right now. Please read, share, and take action accordingly.

Breaking: NVIC Tracking 134 Vaccine Bills Introduced in 35 States

Source: GreenMedInfo.com
Jefferey Jaxen
March 1, 2017

In 2015 California signed into law the highly contested Senate Bill 277 (SB277) accomplishing two outcomes. First, the bill eliminated the personal belief exemption for vaccination. Second, the bill’s actionable directives served as a sobering wake up call that mobilized the public and medical community to enter the fight for an evaporating health freedom and informed consent.

Yet, despite multiple whistleblowers within the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) spotlighting research corruption and pharmaceutical industry collusion, over $3 billion dollars paid out in vaccine damages by the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, widespread vaccine contamination, and overall ineffectiveness and dangers of the current vaccine schedule there has now been 134 vaccine bills introduced in 35 states in the first seven weeks of the US legislative session.

According to the National Vaccine Information Center’s (NVIC) Advocacy Team who track vaccine-related bills, 31 new bills have been added since the team’s last update two weeks prior. Eight of these new bills are in five states appearing for the first time. The coordinated legislative push represents nothing short of a full frontal onslaught by pharmaceutical companies, working through their lobbied politicians, to force dangerous vaccine products upon the backs of the entire US population.

Looking deeper into the tidal wave of vaccine-related legislation sees eight states, deemed “priority opposition alert states” by NVIC, proposing bills to restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions altogether. Similar to California’s new normal thanks to SB277, legislators in Connecticut, Iowa, Minnesota, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Utah are now hoping to remove and impede pillars of health freedom and parental choice.

The Slippery Slope of Legalized Persecution

Perhaps the most disturbing trend and telling takeaway from this new surge of vaccine-related bills within the US is the clear move to legally persecute those choosing to not vaccinate. The new structure to implement vaccine persecution is appearing in two different forms. First, Connecticut, Idaho, Kansas, Massachusetts, Montana, New York, Texas, and Utah have filed bills to expand vaccine tracking or eliminate opt-in consent for vaccine tracking. Second, Arizona, Connecticut, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma, Texas, and Utah have filed bills that would allow ‘school shaming’ by requiring and normalizing the public disclosure of vaccination and exemption rates. Nevada has gone one step further than the rest by introducing AB 200 allowing parents to find out from the school if any children who are not vaccinated are attending.

In the current atmosphere of increasing persecution of those who exercise their medical choice, public disclosure by law opens the gates to community-driven discrimination at all levels, endless local and national media harassment, and mounting pressure on local health professionals to increase community vaccination rates at all costs. If passed and signed into law, Arkansas Senate Bill 301 will allow health departments to share personal information in the immunization registry. In the past, families and their children who wished to exercise their right to health freedom and not vaccinate have endured an increasing trend of vilification by the corporate media, mainstream medical profession, school systems, and the public at large. The recent trend has also seen doctors refuse to treat patients, or kick them out of their practice, for not being vaccinated and/or not signing their in-house “immunization contracts.” Corporate media has myopically focused on the dangers unvaccinated people pose to the ‘herd’ while willfully censoring epidemic rates of autism spectrum disorders, documented vaccine dangers, and multiple CDC whistleblowers warning of research fraud and pharmaceutical industry collusion.

A look back at the government, medical, and media talking points over the recent years has seen a three-part progression bringing the public to the current, openly admitted, stage of green lighting the establishment persecution of the unvaccinated. At first, the message was to simply vaccinate to prevent disease. Due to multifactorial events, the original messaging fell out of favor and was changed to ‘vaccinate to protect others.’ The ‘protect others’ collective approach symbolized a giant leap away from the individual and their health freedom while attempting to put ‘herd immunity’ and the greater good front and center to neutralize personal choice. We have now officially entered a third turning which has historically alarming consequences. Persecution, written into law, of groups of people for their beliefs goes well beyond the once slippery slope the health freedom community found themselves on in the past. The two-pronged approach of increased tracking and monitoring of unvaccinated individuals along with social and legal momentum to denounce the unvaccinated as threats to society and life itself are simply reprehensible and historically chilling.

Connecticut, Texas, and Utah have introduced new bills that require families that utilize vaccine exemptions to participate in a state-sponsored vaccine (re)eduction program. The discriminatory and presumptuous bills assume that those who exert their medical and parental choice are uneducated and ignorant. For the increasing populations of people that believe in health freedom and understand that vaccines are not necessarily safe or effective, attempted bills to force “education” are a sign that pharmaceutical companies and their paid/lobbied mouthpieces have lost control of the narrative and messaging.

Increased Targeting of Doctors

Doctors will not be immune from the targeted persecution. In California, where SB277 is law, the 2015-2016 Annual Report of the Medical Board of California officially states:

The Board will investigate any complaints in which a physician may not be following the standard of care…

Individual physicians will face a new angle of pressure to meet the “standard of care”
as new bills are introduced to track, share, and publish vaccination data as well as restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions. The National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) collects data and issues “report cards” on health plans which meet “important standards of care.” Put simply, The NCQA ratings for health plans are partly dependent upon their ability to deliver pharmaceutical products. If the new bills chronicled by NVIC are signed into law, doctors wishing to allow vaccine choice or using their medical judgement in cases involving vaccine waivers may face a medical board investigation from their respective state. In addition, health plans being rated by the NCQA will likely put pressure on participating doctors who are not fully vaccinating all their patients. The good news is that doctors are now uniting to oppose mandatory vaccination laws, and educate the public on infectious disease, the immune system, and informed consent as seen with the recently formed group Physicians for Informed Consent.

Good News for Health Freedom

The NVIC Advocacy Team also gave good news by listing and encouraging support for new bills filed in Hawaii, Iowa, Indiana, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia that will add or expand vaccine exemptions. As the tide continues to turn, the public is witnessing bills that are not pharmaceutically driven showing that some legislators and authors behind such bills do indeed stand for their constituents. Due to activist who are doing the leg work legislators are listening to their constituents, accepting their documents and materials, and using their arguments on the floor to debate.

NVIC launched the vaccine safety and informed consent movement in America in the early 1980s and is the oldest and largest consumer led organization advocating for the institution of vaccine safety and informed consent protections in the public health system. Their Advocacy Team is doing the vital work of continuously monitoring newly introduced bills and their movements. It is recommended that those interested in alerts of new vaccine-related legislation and contact information to engage with their state’s decision makers and legislators sign up for free at the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

Read More At: GreenMedInfo.com
_____________________________________________________
Jefferey Jaxen is a researcher, independent investigative journalist, writer and voice for health freedom on the front lines of society’s shift towards higher consciousness.  Visit his website here to learn more.

Measles outbreak in L.A. proves vaccine mandates don’t work (but they do create a medical police state)

Image: Measles outbreak in L.A. proves vaccine mandates don’t work (but they do create a medical police state)
Source: NaturalNews.com
David Gutierrez
January 26, 2017

A recent measles outbreak in Los Angeles County reveals the limitations of California’s strict new compulsory vaccination law, health experts say.

A 2014 measles outbreak traced back to Disneyland infected 145 people in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In reaction, California passed a law requiring all children in public and private schools to be fully vaccinated, with only medical exceptions permitted. The law, which took effect in July, makes California one of only three states that do not accept personal or religious exemptions to vaccine requirements.

The first measles case in the new outbreak was diagnosed in L.A. County in early December. Since then, 19 more people have been infected, 17 of them in the same county.

Small, contained outbreak

To contain the outbreak, county health officials interviewed every infected person to learn everywhere they had gone and everyone they had interacted with during the period in which they were most likely to be contagious. Officials then attempted to figure out who else might have been exposed, such as by scanning patient lists at emergency rooms that had been visited.

Officials then contacted 2,000 people who might have been exposed to the virus. About 10 percent had not been vaccinated against measles, and nearly all of these accepted vaccination or another prophylactic treatment.

Because the current outbreak was confined to a limited social circle, it was relatively easy to trace and contain, said Dr. Jeffrey Gunzenhauser, interim health officer for the L.A. County Department of Public Health. Of the 18 infected people in L.A. County, 15 had at least one clear social connection.

But health officials are still remaining cautious, he said.

“They could’ve driven and let’s say they stopped at a gas station — somebody could’ve gotten exposed.” (RELATED: See more news about infectious disease outbreaks at Oubreak.news)

“Full compliance” impossible to achieve

Public health experts were open about the ways that the case demonstrates the weaknesses of the new compulsory vaccine law, SB 277. They noted that people infected in the recent outbreak ranged in age from young children to senior citizens, and that the most well-represented group was people in their 20s. Other than young children, none of these people will be affected by the new law.

That’s because SB 277 takes advantage of the state’s control over schooling to require vaccination for all schoolchildren. To avoid a bureaucratic nightmare, however, the law only requires vaccine checks at kindergarten and seventh grade. Children in between those ages may have several years before being forced to comply. And while the University of California system has voluntarily agreed to follow the same rules set by SB 277, many people leaving high school will never have their vaccination status checked again. Nor is there any mechanism in place to check the status of people who have already left school.

In other words, actually achieving “full vaccine compliance” across all ages would require a degree of intrusiveness that would be politically untenable, if not outright unconstitutional. Thus SB 277 cannot produce “herd immunity” against measles until nearly all unvaccinated people above the age of 12 have died!

Notably, California never had much of a vaccine compliance crisis to begin with. It is estimated that prior to the passage of SB 277, 94.5 percent of kindergartners were already vaccinated against measles. However, because measles are so contagious, a vaccination rate of 96 to 99 percent is required for herd immunity to function (to protect those who cannot be vaccinated for reasons considered valid by the medical establishment).

It’s unclear if such a high rate of compliance is even a feasible goal. Looking just at the contraindications for the MMR vaccine listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and vaccine manufacturer Merck, people who should not get the shot include those with immunodeficiency, those with a family history of immunodeficiency, and those with severe allergies to any component in the vaccine, including gelatin or the antibiotic neomycin. Collectively, these people might well total 1 percent or more of the population.

Also see CDC.news for more news about infectious disease.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources for this article include:

http://www.LATimes.com

https://www.CDC.gov

http://www.Merck.com

New CA bill could increase medical kidnapping of children by government whose parents refuse vaccinations

Image: New CA bill could increase medical kidnapping of children by government whose parents refuse vaccinations

Source: NaturalNews.com
Daniel Barker
January 4, 2017

Last year, California passed a mandatory vaccination bill that removed religious and philosophical exemptions for vaccines, making the state one of the leading proponents of medical tyranny in the U.S.

Now, Dr. Richard Pan – the same California senator who sponsored last year’s SB 277 campaign –  is back with a new proposed piece of legislation that would grant the state sweeping powers over children’s lives – all in the name of their health and well-being, and regardless of their parents’ wishes.

Dr Pan’s proposed bill SB 18 is based on an earlier Assembly Concurrent Resolution (ACR 80), which was originally drafted as a “Bill of Rights for the Children and Youth of California that resolves to invest in all children and youth in order to achieve specified goals to create an optimal environment for their healthy development.”

The original ACR 80 was a vaguely-worded document that – with the passage of the new bill – would then allow the state to “expand” and “codify” its terms. In other words, the state would be authorized to make new rules and regulations regarding children’s health and welfare based on the opinions of medical bureaucracy “experts.”

Increased control over children’s lives justified as “protection of their rights”

If passed, SB 18 could lead to an increase in medical kidnappings and Child Protective Services (CPS) interventions, occurrences of which are already reaching epidemic proportions in California and elsewhere.

The proposed bill states that all children should have:

(1) The right to parents, guardians, or caregivers who act in their best interest.

(2) The right to form healthy attachments with adults responsible for their care and well-being.

(3) The right to live in a safe and healthy environment.

(4) The right to social and emotional well-being.

(5) The right to opportunities to attain optimal cognitive, physical, and social development.

(6) The right to appropriate, quality education and life skills leading to self-sufficiency in adulthood.

(7) The right to appropriate, quality health care.

While all these might sound like obvious self-evident rights, the question is why create additional legislation to protect rights already essentially granted under federal law?

The answer appears to be that California wants even more control over children’s lives than it already has. Under the new law, if passed, state authorities would be able to more easily remove children from their homes if their parents happen to oppose vaccinations, for example.

Children could be more easily kidnapped by CPS if their parents smoke marijuana (legally or not) or if they decide to homeschool their children.

California CPS “among the most corrupt and dangerous in the nation”

Many have accused CPS of corruption and of kidnapping children for the sole purpose of continuing to receive the federal funding allocated for each child removed from their family’s home and placed into foster care.

According to Health Impact News, California’s Department of Children and Family Services  (DCFS) is “among the most corrupt and dangerous in the nation”:

“It’s estimated only around five percent of children taken are from actual cases of parental abuse. Often poverty is considered neglect, while false abuse reports are considered valid even while based on hearsay or speculation without proof.”

Local judicial officials are often as corrupt as the CPS authorities themselves, says Health Impact News, and typically rule in favor of the agency – many biological parents find it nearly impossible to get their children back once CPS has taken them.

California seems to be part of a nationwide trend towards greater state authority over children’s lives. Your kids are no longer considered yours – they have become the property of the state – and if you choose to raise them in a manner that the state disapproves of, they will take them from you.

If you live in California, be sure to voice your opposition against SB 18. If you reside elsewhere, be sure to keep an eye out for similar legislative initiatives and become involved in the fight to protect your rights and those of your children.

Sources:

HealthImpactNews.com

ModernAlternativeHealth.com

Leginfo.Legislature.ca.gov

MedicalKidnap.com

BONKERS: Disney World and Seaworld now handing out DEET insect repellent that causes seizures, encephalopathy and comas in children

DEET insecticide
Source: NaturalNews.com
Mike Adams
August 28, 2016

The official narrative on Zika is a hilarious medical hoax. Millions of people in Brazil and Colombia have carried Zika for decades with no recorded increase in microcephaly cases. Only after a toxic chemical larvacide was dumped into the public water supply did horrific birth defects start to be noticed.

Now, the same quack science cabal of Disney, the CDC, the WHO and wealthy drug companies has been whipping up mass hysteria over Zika, a virus that even the CDC admits causes virtually no symptoms, no hospitalizations and no deaths. In response to this mass hysteria rooted in outright medical quackery, authorities have been desperately pushing DEET chemicals as insect repellants.

Yet as I have exhaustively documented here on Natural News, DEET is one part of a binary chemical weapon that causes brain damage in humans. Known as “N,N-Diethyl-3-methylbenzamide” from a chemistry point of view, when DEET is combined with carbamate class pesticide chemicals — which are found everywhere in the food supply — the result is a “hyper toxic” brain damaging chemical cocktail that radically damages brain function. One of the chemical classes in this binary weapon system is similar to VX Nerve Gas chemical weapons that kill mammals within seconds.

This chemical cocktail functions as an “acetylcholinesterase inhibitor,” meaning it “paralyzes” brain cells after causing them to be hyper stimulated. The result is cognitive confusion, fear, memory loss and other symptoms that curiously resemble the brain damage we’re all told is caused by Zika virus.

As I wrote in this science story documenting the molecular interaction (and citing numerous published sources):

Blocking AChE causes “disrupted neurotransmission” and other damaging effects to brain cells: “The enzyme inactivation, induced by various inhibitors, leads to acetylcholine accumulation, hyperstimulation of nicotinic and muscarinic receptors, and disrupted neurotransmission.”

According to that science paper, AChE inhibitors work similarly to carbamate and organophosphate pesticides — two classes of chemicals routinely sprayed all over the national food supply — meaning that people who slather their skin with DEET are poisoning themselves with brain-disrupting pesticide chemicals. Says the paper, “In medicine and agriculture, the word ‘organophosphates’ refers to a group of insecticides and nerve agents that inhibit AChE.”

These organophosphates “exert their main toxicological effects through non-reversible phosphorylation of esterases in the central nervous system,” report the scientists. “The acute toxic effects are related to irreversible inactivation of AChE.”

In other words, some classes of AChE inhibitors can cause irreversible damage to the central nervous system.

Disney World, SeaWorld and Universal Orlando to start handing out chemical weapons for parents to apply to the skin of their children

“Walt Disney World, Universal Orlando and SeaWorld Entertainment will start distributing free insect repellent Sunday,” reports the Orland Sentinel.

“Fears have escalated about the virus, which is especially dangerous to pregnant women because it can affect fetal brains and cause babies to be born with unusually small heads,” says the Sentinel article.

Of course, the Sentinel offers no evidence of that assertion. The farcical idea that Zika virus alone is responsible for every microcephaly case in the world is now accepted as a cultural narrative… a “true myth” reinforced by consensus delusion.

No evidence is needed to support such statements, you see, because everybody “knows” Zika causes microcephaly. We’ve all seen the pictures on the news, right? Yet those same news outlets deliberately neglected to report the chemical exposures that led to those brain defects.

DEET side effects include “encephalopathy, seizures, movement disorders, coma” which appear “most commonly in children”

Adding to the “oh-my-God-how-f’ing-stupid-are-these-people” effect in all this is the realization that DEET can cause extreme neurological disorders in children.

According to this PesticideInfo.org reference page, DEET “toxicity is primarily neurologic (encephalopathy, seizures, movement disorders, coma) and may occur via oral or dermal exposure, most commonly in children.”

You got that? It occurs from “dermal exposure” (i.e. putting it on your skin) and appears “most commonly in children” and can result in “seizures” and “encephalopathy” in those children.

Well golly, that makes it the perfect chemical for Disney World! Let’s just spray all the children and put free DEET sprays in all the rooms, and see what happens!

That same reference page on DEET toxicity, by the way, also lists the following:

Symptoms of DEET Exposure

– Eye and mucous membrane irritation.
– Ingestion can cause CNS disturbances.
– Desquamation about the nose, dryness of face, a slight tingling sensation. Contact urticaria.
– Toxicity is primarily neurologic (encephalopathy, seizures, movement disorders, coma) and may occur via oral or dermal exposure, most commonly in children.
– Bradycardia is rare but has been reported after dermal exposure to deet. Hypotension has been reported after large ingestions.
– Eye contact may result in a smarting sensation. A burning sensation of the lips, tongue and mouth may be noted.
– Confusion, ataxia, hypertonicity, and clonic jerking progressing to coma and seizures may occur after acute oral or chronic dermal exposure.
– Abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting.

I want to bring you attention to this line: “Confusion, ataxia, hypertonicity, and clonic jerking progressing to coma and seizures may occur after acute oral or chronic dermal exposure.”

Sounds like just another wonderful day at Disney, doesn’t it?

Disney poisoning children is not new: They were also at the center of the staged measles outbreak that led to SB 277 in California

It’s no surprise that Disney — a globalist propaganda conglomerate that uses entertainment as a vector for controlling belief systems by installing false cultural narratives via film — is engaged in the mass chemical poisoning of children in Florida.

This is the same globalist group that was at the epicenter of the staged measles outbreak at Disneyland in California: An epidemiological “false flag” that was timed and engineered to push for the passage of SB 277, the new state law that forces immunizations on parents via threat of criminalization and denial of access to public education. SB 277 is, of course, a violation of fundamental human rights while simultaneously violating women’s rights, parental rights and basic medical ethics.

See Vaccine industry social influence document reveals attempted bribery of ‘key social influencers’ such as Disney / Marvel, ESPN, Oprah and a CNN reporter to learn more about how the criminally operated vaccine industry leverages large social influencers like Disney to push medical quackery combined with demands for absolute social obedience.

As we now know, Disney played a key role in all that by serving as “ground zero” for the massive, exhaustive media fear campaign which condemned un-vaccinated children as virus-carrying criminals to be targeted for forced injections of toxic substances which still include brain damaging mercury.

SB 277’s pharma whore, state sen. Richard Pan, received huge donations from pharma right before the measles “outbreak” at Disneyland. Magically, the full text for SB 277 had already been pre-written and was quickly ushered into the legislative process, buoyed by the massive media info-terrorism campaign that was timed to spread Disneyland fear for maximum impact. They don’t call it the “Magical Kingdom” for nothing.

See why Richard Pan is called the Mercury Joker:


Now, Zika fear mongering is following the exact same model of social manipulation and medical quackery. The role of the media is to whip up maximum fear followed by the widespread condemnation of actual science that questions the false narratives.

Soon, we’re going to see parents who refuse to poison their children with DEET condemned as irresponsible citizens, then possibly forced to apply brain damaging chemicals to the skin of their own children by order of the state. The U.S. government, by the way, has a long history of conducting chemical medical experiments on its own citizens.

The truth is, no one is safe when medical quackery combines with totalitarian government to criminalize parents who refuse to poison their own children. And that’s exactly what it has come to in America today. The Zika hoax accomplishes the exact same thing as the measles hoax and the bird flu hoax: The forced mass obedience of the population to the medical dictators who poison children by design.

Free chemical weapons in every hotel room… spray all your children!

“Tourism experts and Gov. Rick Scott applauded the theme parks’ move,” reports the Orlando Sentinel, because of course Gov. Rick Scott is scientifically illiterate and does whatever the science dictators tell him to do. “Disney will offer free pump bottles and towelettes at its theme parks, Disney Springs and ESPN Wide World of Sports. Hotel rooms will have aerosol bug spray. Signs at the resort will inform visitors that repellent and protective clothing can help them avoid mosquito bites,” continues the Sentinel.

It makes me wonder why Disney World doesn’t post Zika Free Zone signs all over the park, to keep out the mosquitoes without having to use any chemicals at all. After all, if “Gun Free Zone” signs are supposed to reduce shootings, then it only seems logical that “Zika Free Zone” signs would halt Zika virus infections, right?

That’s how stupid the status quo has become, by the way. Most people literally believe in scientific voodoo, thinking that signs alone can stop mass murderers, or that all shrunken brains are caused by Zika virus. Now, the Zika brainwashing is so extensive that Disney is actually placing DEET chemical weapons in the rooms of its resorts, so that parents can spray their children before they go outside to be eaten by alligators.

Oh, by the way, DEET is also toxic to alligators. If you do spray your children with DEET, please don’t feed them to the gators.

DEET is toxic to aquatic ecosystems… so SeaWorld is handing it out for free!

Adding to the hilarity and insanity of this entire situation, DEET is also toxic to aquatic ecosystems. So of course, “SeaWorld will provide it at its three Orlando theme and water parks, along with Busch Gardens and Adventure Island in Tampa,” reports the Orlando Sentinel.

As this Sigma-Aldrich safety sheet explains, DEET demonstrates “Acute aquatic toxicity (Category 3)” and is “Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects.”

That same document also explains that DEET shows “toxicity to fish” and is “Harmful to aquatic life.”

The geniuses at SeaWorld — who also commit horrific animal rights abuses against intelligent whales, enslaving them for the amusement of stupid humans — think that it’s an awesome idea to spray an aquatic toxin all over the SeaWorld park in an effort to kill mosquitoes that pose no significant risk to children whatsoever.

Once the children start showing seizures and neurological problems, the complicit media will blame it all on Zika!

And here’s the most grotesque chapter in all this: Once all these children who visited Disney World start to suffer neurological disorders, seizures, comas or similar side effects caused by DEET, the complicit mainstream media will, predictably, blame it all on Zika!

Once that happens, the call will go out for MORE spraying, more DEET, more chemical bombardment of everyone… and the brain damage will escalate in an expanding cycle of what can only be called “the chemical suicide of the human race.”

I hope you understand at this point that all mainstream “official sources” — government experts, mainstream scientists, mainstream journalists and politicians — are all irredeemably stupid beyond belief. They are literally poisoning the brains of children and calling it “safety” against a wildly exaggerated, hyped-up threat (Zika virus).

It makes you wonder just how much brain damage has already taken place among Disney executives who might be using DEET on their own skin. Are these people stupid? Or is this all deliberate and they’re really just evil?

It’s impossible to know the answer to that, of course. But one thing we can all agree on is to keep your children away from Disney at all costs, as Disney has now become a proponent of chemical child abuse while serving as a key influencer to push provably false medical quackery and scientific totalitarianism.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources for this story include
http://www.naturalnews.com/055048_DEET_chemi…

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/health/zika-v…

http://www.pesticideinfo.org/Detail_Chemical…

http://www.naturalnews.com/037653_vaccine_ad…

http://www.truthwiki.org/richard-pan-senator…

http://www.naturalnews.com/049634_Richard_Pa…

http://www.naturalnews.com/050714_Richard_Pa…

http://www.naturalnews.com/022383_research_e…

http://www.naturalnews.com/055120_zika_virus…

http://fleascience.com/wp-content/uploads/20…

Grotesquely incompetent Judge won’t suspend mandatory vaccination

QuestionEverything
Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappoport
August 27, 2016

I’ll keep this as simple as I can.

The infamous SB277, passed into CA law in 2015, made vaccines mandatory for school children in the state.

Last month, a lawsuit was filed, with the purpose of overturning the law. The lawyers asked Federal Judge Dana Sabraw to keep the law from going into effect while the case moves forward.

Sabraw just said no.

Among the reasons he cited for his decision (LA Times, 8/28): “U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego wrote that state Legislatures have ‘a long history of requiring children to be vaccinated as a condition to school enrollment, and for as many years, both state and federal courts have upheld those requirements against constitutional challenge’.”

I don’t see how Judge Sabraw’s opinion could be more ridiculous. Or ludicrous. Or incompetent. Or wrong.

Why? Because ‘the long history’ he refers to is quite different.

The states have always upheld exemptions from vaccination on several grounds: medical waiver, religious objection, philosophical objection. THAT’S the tradition.

SB277 goes against the tradition, to say the very least. SB277 breaks new ground in allowing the state to operate as a medical fascist in the area of vaccinations.

Under SB277, a parent’s only option, aside from a hard-to-obtain medical exemption, is to home school her child. And obviously, not all parents can afford to exercise that option, because they have to work to pay the bills.

From what source is Judge Sabraw getting his information about “long history” and tradition? From a CDC PR pamphlet? From a drug company? From aliens on the moon?

His considered opinion in this case is on the order of saying, “Look, all states have always had strict rules about crossing the street on Thursdays. You can’t do it or you’re breaking the law.”

Maybe the Judge just decided to make up his version of history out of thin air.

Actually, it appears he did that in a prior case. The issue there centered on what lawyers can and can’t say during their closing arguments. They can’t go off and say anything. They definitely can’t refer to “facts” that were never presented during the trial. They can’t just make stuff up.

The website, abovethelaw.com, has the story. Joe Patrice colorfully writes:

“The case arose in 2010, when a guy was stopped by border agents and Skippy the Wonder Dog managed to uncover 112 sealed packages weighing 321.33 pounds (or 146.06 kilograms if you’re Canadian or otherwise a Communist) of marijuana. The defendant claimed he was set up. In the government’s rebuttal closing, the prosecutor, Steve Miller, pulled some Hocus Pocus and started telling the jury about a number of reasons why the defendant’s story couldn’t be believed. That would be par for the course, except none of these ‘facts’ were brought out during the trial itself.

“When defense counsel objected, Judge Dana M. Sabraw responded ‘with the admonition that this is counsel’s argument, it is up to the jury to determine the facts.’ Stellar judging. I wish I’d known about the “you can assert whatever you want in closing because it’s ‘up to the jury to determine facts’” rule.”

Yes, let’s just invent the law as we go along. Make up the law out of thin air. Make up tradition and history out of thin air. Make up whatever you need to make up, in order to deny the people of California a fair hearing on a fascist law that forces them to vaccinate their children with the full CDC load of toxic chemicals and germs.

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com
________________________________________________________________

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.

The film Vaxxed could be outlawed in California, if this bill passes

... and Parents React to the Documentary VAXXED : Conscious Life News

Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappoport
August 22, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

“Let’s see, Mr. Reporter. You received an undercover recording of a medical researcher confessing his crimes. You posted the recording and wrote about it. You’re the one who is guilty of a crime. Next case!”

“Wait, Your Honor! That recording is vital information for the public. It shows that a vaccine considered to be safe actually causes brain damage in children.”

“No. It shows you violated the law by posting the recording. It was illegally made, and you aided and abetted and forwarded that crime. As I said, next case!”

Buckle up.

The shocking film Vaxxed (trailer) is drawing audiences all over the country. It details the confessions of a CDC researcher, William Thompson, who states that he and his colleagues buried data in a key study on the MMR vaccine.

In the study, the vaccine was given a free pass, with assurances that it didn’t increase the risk of autism in children—when, in fact, the data showed it did increase that risk.

***The key moments in Vaxxed are audio recordings of CDC researcher Thompson confessing his sins.

But wait. Now we have a bill, AB 1671, up before the California legislature. If it passes, it could make it a crime to screen Vaxxed or even write an article about it.

Those recordings of Thompson could be labeled “undercover,” and “illegal,” and therefore make them the target of AB 1671.

Furthermore, AB 1671 specifically seeks to protect “healthcare providers” from “exposure” via “undercover recordings” documenting their crimes. Certainly, by stretching the definitions a bit, the CDC, for whom Thompson works, and Thompson himself, could be considered such healthcare providers. Lawyers could argue that position until the cows come home and hang up a case in various courts for years—while an injunction prohibiting the screening of Vaxxed remains in force.

Nick Cahill, at the Courthouse News Service, reports on AB 1671 (“Abortion Clinic Sting Videos Sprout Free-Speech Battle”, Thursday, August 11, 2016):

“The bill would criminalize publishing undercover video footage of ‘health care providers’ and subject third parties, including journalists, to penalties for reporting and distributing the illegally recorded footage.” [My comment: It appears criminal penalties could be applied to anyone who posts the videos and comments on them, online. Not just reporters. And surely, audio recordings, as well as videos, would be banned.]

Cahill continues: “Under AB 1671, a journalist receiving and posting footage from an anonymous source could be punished by the state as well as be opened up to potential civil lawsuits. Whistleblowers would not be exempt from the proposal either, regardless of how they obtained the illegal footage.”

In the case of Vaxxed, the film makers received or obtained the recordings of CDC researcher Thompson and used them to make their case: Thompson was confessing to crimes he and colleagues committed at the CDC.

But if AB 1671 passes, releasing those recordings and commenting on them, in a film, could be considered a crime, punishable by fine, jail—and the film makers could also be open to lawsuits.

And of course, Vaxxed could be banned from all theaters in California.

As bizarre as it seems, AB 1671 isn’t just targeting people who make the undercover recordings. Its focus is on reporters who receive those recordings and then use them, post them, and write about them.

This lunatic attack on free speech coordinates tightly with the infamous 2015 California law, SB277, which made vaccinating California school children mandatory.

Vaxxed certainly raises ominous questions about that law—and now the government of California is considering the addition of a new law that could ban Vaxxed.

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com
_____________________________________________________________

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com or OutsideTheRealityMachine.