Measles outbreak in L.A. proves vaccine mandates don’t work (but they do create a medical police state)

Image: Measles outbreak in L.A. proves vaccine mandates don’t work (but they do create a medical police state)
Source: NaturalNews.com
David Gutierrez
January 26, 2017

A recent measles outbreak in Los Angeles County reveals the limitations of California’s strict new compulsory vaccination law, health experts say.

A 2014 measles outbreak traced back to Disneyland infected 145 people in the United States, Canada, and Mexico. In reaction, California passed a law requiring all children in public and private schools to be fully vaccinated, with only medical exceptions permitted. The law, which took effect in July, makes California one of only three states that do not accept personal or religious exemptions to vaccine requirements.

The first measles case in the new outbreak was diagnosed in L.A. County in early December. Since then, 19 more people have been infected, 17 of them in the same county.

Small, contained outbreak

To contain the outbreak, county health officials interviewed every infected person to learn everywhere they had gone and everyone they had interacted with during the period in which they were most likely to be contagious. Officials then attempted to figure out who else might have been exposed, such as by scanning patient lists at emergency rooms that had been visited.

Officials then contacted 2,000 people who might have been exposed to the virus. About 10 percent had not been vaccinated against measles, and nearly all of these accepted vaccination or another prophylactic treatment.

Because the current outbreak was confined to a limited social circle, it was relatively easy to trace and contain, said Dr. Jeffrey Gunzenhauser, interim health officer for the L.A. County Department of Public Health. Of the 18 infected people in L.A. County, 15 had at least one clear social connection.

But health officials are still remaining cautious, he said.

“They could’ve driven and let’s say they stopped at a gas station — somebody could’ve gotten exposed.” (RELATED: See more news about infectious disease outbreaks at Oubreak.news)

“Full compliance” impossible to achieve

Public health experts were open about the ways that the case demonstrates the weaknesses of the new compulsory vaccine law, SB 277. They noted that people infected in the recent outbreak ranged in age from young children to senior citizens, and that the most well-represented group was people in their 20s. Other than young children, none of these people will be affected by the new law.

That’s because SB 277 takes advantage of the state’s control over schooling to require vaccination for all schoolchildren. To avoid a bureaucratic nightmare, however, the law only requires vaccine checks at kindergarten and seventh grade. Children in between those ages may have several years before being forced to comply. And while the University of California system has voluntarily agreed to follow the same rules set by SB 277, many people leaving high school will never have their vaccination status checked again. Nor is there any mechanism in place to check the status of people who have already left school.

In other words, actually achieving “full vaccine compliance” across all ages would require a degree of intrusiveness that would be politically untenable, if not outright unconstitutional. Thus SB 277 cannot produce “herd immunity” against measles until nearly all unvaccinated people above the age of 12 have died!

Notably, California never had much of a vaccine compliance crisis to begin with. It is estimated that prior to the passage of SB 277, 94.5 percent of kindergartners were already vaccinated against measles. However, because measles are so contagious, a vaccination rate of 96 to 99 percent is required for herd immunity to function (to protect those who cannot be vaccinated for reasons considered valid by the medical establishment).

It’s unclear if such a high rate of compliance is even a feasible goal. Looking just at the contraindications for the MMR vaccine listed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and vaccine manufacturer Merck, people who should not get the shot include those with immunodeficiency, those with a family history of immunodeficiency, and those with severe allergies to any component in the vaccine, including gelatin or the antibiotic neomycin. Collectively, these people might well total 1 percent or more of the population.

Also see CDC.news for more news about infectious disease.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources for this article include:

http://www.LATimes.com

https://www.CDC.gov

http://www.Merck.com

Advertisements

Orwellian CA Bill: Reporters Can’t Post Undercover Videos

FactsTruthLies
Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappoport
August 15, 2016

This one is big. It adds to California’s growing reputation as Police State Central.

First we had SB 277, which forced vaccinations on school children. Now we have Assembly Bill 1671, which would make it a crime for journalists to post and report on certain undercover videos, even though they didn’t make the videos.

That’s right. In California, such videos are already illegal, because they don’t have permission of all parties to be recorded. But if Bill 1671 passes, reporters who are sent those videos, or find them, couldn’t post them and write stories about them. Mainstream, alternative, freelance reporters—it wouldn’t matter.

Even more bizarre, Bill 1671 specifies undercover videos that secretly record “healthcare providers.” These are the videos targeted by the Bill.

Nick Cahill, at the Courthouse News Service, has the story (“Abortion Clinic Sting Videos Sprout Free-Speech Battle”, Thursday, August 11, 2016). Here are key quotes. Buckle up:

“Controversy surrounding secretly recorded videos showing Planned Parenthood employees discussing fetal tissue sales has morphed into a California proposal that would punish media companies for reporting on certain undercover videos. But media groups say the bill, which is on the verge of clearing the Legislature, could have a ‘chilling effect’ on free speech and set the state up for First Amendment court battles.”

“Born from the 2015 hidden-camera footage released by the anti-abortion Center for Medical Progress, Planned Parenthood is pushing Assembly Bill 1671 which it claims will protect abortion clinics and other health care providers from similar malicious sting operations.”

“The bill would criminalize publishing undercover video footage of ‘health care providers’ and subject third parties, including journalists, to penalties for reporting and distributing the illegally recorded footage.” [My comment: It appears criminal penalties could be applied to anyone who posts the videos and comments on them, online. Not just reporters.]

“Under AB 1671, a journalist receiving and posting footage from an anonymous source could be punished by the state as well as be opened up to potential civil lawsuits. Whistleblowers would not be exempt from the proposal either, regardless of how they obtained the illegal footage.”

“The opponents take issue with how the bill specifically criminalizes the distribution of communication with a health care provider. Targeting a specific area of speech amounts to content-based regulation of speech and is unconstitutional, the ACLU claims.”

“’The same rationale for punishing communications of some preferred professions or industries could as easily be applied to other communications [such as] law enforcement, animal testing labs, gun makers, lethal injection drug producers, the petroleum industry and religious sects,’ ACLU legislative director Kevin Baker wrote in an opposition letter…”

If you feel you’ve just entered the Twilight Zone, gone down the rabbit hole, you have.

How about this? Some enterprising citizen-reporter in California secretly records a conversation with a doctor, in which the doctor admits that he vaccinates all children-patients, but would never vaccinate his own kids.

The video link is sent to a journalist in Los Angeles, who then posts it on his website. Suddenly, that LA journalist is hauled into court and the video is taken down.

What about this? Somebody makes a secret recording of a conversation between a well-known oncologist and his colleague about the massive dangers of chemotherapy—including remarks about several of the doctors’ cancer patients who actually died from chemo. A freelance reporter, who obtains the video, posts it on his site. The video is taken down, the reporter is arrested, prosecuted—and sued.

And couldn’t a California-based pharmaceutical company claim status as a “health provider?” Supposed an employee secretly recorded a conversation between two executives, during which they admitted the company buried studies of a new drug because “too many volunteers died” during testing. The employee sends the recording to a reporter at the LA Times. The reporter shows it to his editor. Is that in itself a crime?

Yes.

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com
__________________________________________________________________

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

California About To Pass The ‘Medical Pedophiles Protection Act’ To Criminalizing Journalists For Posting Videos That Document Medical Abuse Of Children, Seniors & Surgical Patients

Undercover journalism

Source: NaturalNews.com
Mike Adams
August 16, 2016

As yet more proof that you’re living in a totalitarian police state regime run by mentally insane criminals named Jerry Brown and Nancy Pelosi, California is about to pass a law that would explicitly criminalize undercover investigative videos of all “health care providers.”

This means any journalist who records nursing homes abusing elderly patients would be thrown in jail, right alongside the parents who are now being criminalized by the vaccine mandate SB 277. (Oh yeah, SB 277 was just the beginning of Gov. Brown’s totalitarian violation of fundamental human rights.)

“The bill would criminalize publishing undercover video footage of ‘health care providers’ and subject third parties, including journalists, to penalties for reporting and distributing the illegally recorded footage,” reports AllGov.com. “Under AB 1671, a journalist receiving and posting footage from an anonymous source could be punished by the state as well as be opened up to potential civil lawsuits. Whistleblowers would not be exempt from the proposal either, regardless of how they obtained the illegal footage.”

Doctors who rape patients under anesthesia can now count on the corrupt state government of California to protect their “privacy” from investigative journalists who film them to expose their abusive assaults. Abortion chop shop organ harvesting factories — also known as “Planned Parenthood” — would also be safe from the scrutiny that comes from the investigative journalism that recently caught their principals on tape, admitting to harvesting intact human heads (and other body parts) from partially born, living, breathing babies who are then killed on sight so that their valuable organs can be collected and sold off for “medical science.”

The Medical Pedophiles Protection Act criminalizes journalism, free speech and the exposing of medical predators who target children

Yes, California is about to become North Korea, and assembly bill AB-1671 codifies it into law. Click here to read the proposal law yourself, so that you can better understand how a police state silences freedom of the press and crushes journalistic liberty in order to conceal the mass murder of babies, patients and senior citizens who are routinely abused or murdered by rogue health care providers.

Even more shockingly, the proposed California law describes one year prison sentences for any blogger or journalist who posts someone else’s undercover video involving health care abuses. The law actually states, “A person aids and abets the commission of an offense when he or she, with knowledge of the unlawful purpose of the perpetrator and with the intent or purpose of committing, facilitating, or encouraging the commission of the offense, by act or advice, aids, promotes, encourages, or instigates the commission of the offense…” The law further states that criminal prosecutions apply to anyone who “intentionally discloses or distributes, in any manner, in any forum, including, but not limited to, Internet Web sites and social media, or for any purpose, the contents of a confidential communication with a health care provider that is obtained by that person…”

In other words, if someone films a lunatic doctor — such as Dr. Richard Pan, as an example — medically assaulting an innocent child, any person they “leak” the video to will be arrested and thrown in prison if they post the video online. I call it the Medical Pedophiles Protection Act because it would give abusive doctors, surgeons, dentists and nursing home staffers carte blanche protection against being exposed by real journalism.

The criminal government of California hates real journalism, you see. The free press must be criminalized, just as it has recently been criminalized in China, where all independent blogs and news websites have now been shut down by decree. In China, North Korea, Venezuela and now California, all media is limited to official state-run media, and those who defy the official narratives of the criminal politicians must be intimidated, terrorized and imprisoned.

In places like China and North Korea, coincidentally, this also involves having your organs harvested to be sold off to black market buyers. California is different. There, the organ harvesting takes place at Planned Parenthood and is called “scientific research.”

Note to medical pedophiles: Move to California ASAP!

Not only would this proposed law AB-1671 make it illegal for journalists to record and distribute videos exposing medical doctors sexually assaulting young children; it also encourages medical pedophiles from across America to move to California and set up practices there, where they can operate with impunity, knowing that anyone who catches them on film sexually assaulting a child will be thrown in prison themselves. How’s that for justice?

It’s the new Pedo Gold Rush of modern medicine, and it’s all made possible by Gov. Jerry Brown, the same despicable Governor who already legalized medical child abuse with SB 277. Now he wants doctors with pricks and dicks to be able to violate children with impunity, all while throwing the journalists in jail for trying to protect those children from systematic medical child abuse. Perhaps the Governor should change his name to Ben Dover and add his name to state highways signs: “Welcome to California! BEN DOVER.”

What a wonderful new liberal society Gov. Brown and his radical leftist minions have created for Californians. The truth is criminalized. The science is fabricated. Parental rights are obliterated. And journalists are terrorized into silence.

As Jon Rappoport explains on his site:

If you feel you’ve just entered the Twilight Zone, gone down the rabbit hole, you have.

How about this? Some enterprising citizen-reporter in California secretly records a conversation with a doctor, in which the doctor admits that he vaccinates all children-patients, but would never vaccinate his own kids.

The video link is sent to a journalist in Los Angeles, who then posts it on his website. Suddenly, that LA journalist is hauled into court and the video is taken down.

What about this? Somebody makes a secret recording of a conversation between a well-known oncologist and his colleague about the massive dangers of chemotherapy—including remarks about several of the doctors’ cancer patients who actually died from chemo. A freelance reporter, who obtains the video, posts it on his site. The video is taken down, the reporter is arrested, prosecuted—and sued.

And couldn’t a California-based pharmaceutical company claim status as a “health provider?” Supposed an employee secretly recorded a conversation between two executives, during which they admitted the company buried studies of a new drug because “too many volunteers died” during testing. The employee sends the recording to a reporter at the LA Times. The reporter shows it to his editor. Is that in itself a crime?

Yes.

Government can secretly record YOU, but you can’t secretly record CRIMES against children

Just so you know the real score in this totalitarian era of criminal government, remember that the government reserves every right to secretly spy on YOU and record your keystrokes, web searches, phone calls, emails and even covert videos of you in your own home. All these secret recordings, mostly obtained without warrants of any kind, can be legally used to incriminate you for engaging in “illegal activity” such as consuming CBD oil, for example, which the DEA still considers to be a Schedule I Controlled Substance.

Yet when a citizen such as yourself conducts an undercover investigation into the crimes, abuses and violations of health care providers, suddenly you’re the criminal yet again. YOU get arrested, charged and thrown in prison while the real criminals who are sexually abusing children and anesthetized surgical patients get away scot-free. See how it works? Government protects the medical criminals, pedophiles and abusers precisely because those kind of people represent the very foundation of the corrupt medical system in the first place.

Welcome to the real California, where the Medical Pedophiles Protection Act is about to be signed into law, thereby “protecting” the numerous crimes of health care violators who routinely harvest organs from innocent children (who are first murdered, of course). This is the new “progressive society” the liberals promised you… are you enjoying it yet? Do you realize that socialism and communism always eventually leads to genocide and mass murder? (If not, read some history to learn what happens when societies devolve into totalitarian government regimes…)

Vote for Hillary and you’ll get even more of this. Keep electing democrats to office and you’ll sooner or later find yourself living (or dying) in North Korea. Oh yeah, and it’s all to “protect you” because the government knows best. So hand over your children, your parental rights, your human rights and your dignity. Father J. Brown wants to protect pedophiles, rapists and abusers who practice “health care” in the state of California, and there’s absolutely nothing you can do to stop them unless you’re willing to go to prison.

No wonder every sane person is now leaving California for good. The economic collapse of the state, by the way, will inevitably follow the collapse of human rights and free speech rights that we’re currently witnessing. California is lost. It’s now on a collision course with extreme left-wing despotism and police state tyranny. ESCAPE WHILE YOU STILL CAN.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources for this article include:
http://www.allgov.com/news/controversies/cal…

http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/08/15…

http://www.naturalnews.com/054987_CBD_cannab…

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB1671