Why Vaccines, Pesticides & Chemtrails Are The Top Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Weapons of mass destruction
Source: NaturalNews.com
S.D. Wells
August 15, 2016

Before delving into these highly controversial subjects, it is paramount to review the proper definitions of each, as they inherently relate to the relevant understanding of how each applies to today’s “science,” politics, the environment, and of course, human health and safety.

First, a weapon of mass destruction, or “WMD,” is a chemical, nuclear, radiological or biological weapon that has the ability to kill and bring significant harm to a large number of humans, not to mention massive damage to human-made structures and the biosphere.

Pesticides are the only toxic substances released intentionally into our environment (on a regular basis) to kill living things. The term pesticide is an umbrella term that includes substances used to kill weeds (herbicides), insects (insecticides), fungus (fungicides) and rodents (rodenticides), among other agricultural “pests.”

Chemtrails are part of an ongoing mass aerial dispersal of biological waste and pesticides that initially look like normal contrails, but are easy to detect because they do not dissipate quickly since they are not formed from normal water-based condensation. Chemtrails are also much thicker than contrails, and often extend across the sky in patterns of Xs and tick-tack-toe-looking grids.

Vaccines are experimental injections of disease-causing agents intended to conjure an unnatural, hyper-immune reaction in humans in order to ameliorate the effects of future infections by “wild” pathogens. Yet, the effectiveness of inoculation theory and practice has never been proven successful; in fact, “deadened” or “weakened” forms of microbes and viruses often spring back to life inside the injected humans, spreading or “shedding” the very infectious disease the immunization is supposed to prevent. Even if the injected victim does not become immediately ill from the dormant virus, known carcinogenic agents and genetically modified organisms are now prominent in all vaccines, including flu shots, and can cause severe health detriment in the short- and long-term.

These agents, or “adjuvants,” often include mercury (listed as thimerosal), monosodium glutamate (MSG), formaldehyde (embalming fluid) and aluminum (known to cause Alzheimer’s disease). No vaccine has ever been proven safe for humans, despite “paid for” research published by the manufacturers. Current immunizations are proven to contribute to the spread of over 25 known infectious diseases, including polio and measles.

Biological and chemical weapons utilized for population control in America and developing countries

No other country in the world is more interested in the cessation of population expansion than the USA, especially when it comes to eugenics – the racial profiling and proliferation of non-whites, as the globalists and elite super-rich pretend to help minorities and the under-privileged with “food” and “medicine.”

In fact, U.S. law allows the testing of chemicals and biological agents on the civilian population. There is no conformed consent here, and there are no democratic voting procedures in place to protect human health, animal health or environmental welfare. Plus, many self-proclaimed philanthropists, like Bill Gates and George Soros, fund depopulation agendas by funding, promoting, and distributing GM (genetically modified) foods (cancer-causing, pesticide-laden food) and toxic vaccinations to unsuspecting populations.

Under the guise of help, entire populations of “undesirables” are being systematically wiped out by the very food and medicine they believe are helping them. Vaccines like DTAP and HPV are sterilizing many female teenagers. In fact, Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO for sterilizing millions of girls at the beginning of their child-bearing age, under the guise of the “anti-tetanus” vaccination program that’s sponsored by the Kenyan government itself. Scientific evidence from independent laboratories revealed at least half a dozen samples of the tetanus vaccine tested from various locations around Kenya confirmed their worst fears, as they tested positive for the HCG antigen used in anti-fertility vaccines!

Zika virus HOAX: Spreading of ‘Naled’ actually causes the birth defects mass media claims are caused by Zika

Right now, over a 10-square-mile area of Miami-Dade County, EPA- and CDC-approved mass chemical warfare on humans is in effect, with the excuse tied to the Zika virus hoax. The highly toxic insecticide “Naled” (pun may be intended) contains dibrom, known to cause birth defects in humans, even in low concentrations. So, in effect, a weapon of mass destruction is being used in the name of fighting mosquitoes, and the U.S. population is so dumbed-down from fluoridated water and pharmaceuticals, that they believe the government actually cares about them and is trying to help.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources for this article include:









The Whole Truth About Whole Foods: Shocking New Min-Documentary Excoriated This Deceptive, Fraudulent Corporation For Becoming The Monsanto Of Food Retailing

Whole Foods Market
Source: NaturalNews.com
Mike Adams
August 6, 2016

I’ve just released a damning new mini-documentary called The WHOLE TRUTH about Whole Foods. Click here to watch it now.

This mini-documentary reveals how Whole Foods has become a supporter of Monsanto, deliberately deceiving health-conscious food consumers into falsely believing that Whole Foods Market stores sell no products containing GMOs, heavy metals or toxic pesticides and herbicides.

In truth, Whole Foods Market stores are loaded with unlabeled GMOs, heavy metals, toxic pesticides and even glyphosate herbicide.

Marketing fraud and deliberate deception

The Whole Foods corporation deliberately deceives its consumers by making false, fraudulent claims that its stores sell “Nothing artificial, ever” when, in reality, Whole Foods Market stores are filled with artificially engineered food crops (GMOs) which, to this day, remain unlabeled.

As this mini-documentary reveals, Whole Foods CEO Walter Robb has mastered the language of healthy eating and sustainability in order to deceive Whole Foods consumers into thinking his company is acting in their best interests. Yet behind the scenes, Whole Foods was a major force behind the pushing of the Monsanto-inspired anti GMO labeling law that President Obama just signed.

Now, thanks to the efforts of Whole Foods and Monsanto, all GMO labeling laws across America have just been obliterated, replaced by a federal non-labeling scheme that will financially benefit both Monsanto and Whole Foods. See SELL OUT: Whole Foods partners with Monsanto to endorse fake GMO-labeling bill that’s actually an ANTI-labeling bill with zero penalties for non-compliance.

What Whole Foods and Monsanto have in common is that they both benefit from the deception of selling unlabeled GMOs to unwitting consumers.

Click here to watch the entire mini-documentary now (and share this with everyone you know).

Learn how Whole Foods promotes chemical violence against women and children in this eye-opening story: BETRAYED! Whole Foods and the Organic Trade Association just plowed right through American food consumers like the terrorist truck rampage in France (op ed).

Read More At: NatualNews.com

Florida Preparing To Fight Zika With Controversial Insecticide Linked To Severe Health & Environmental Effects

Zika hysteria

Source: NaturalNews.com
Julie Wilson
August 5, 2016

Let’s face it, as was the case with Ebola, the media is blowing this Zika virus threat totally out of proportion, and as a result, some really bad decisions are being made along the way. As far as we’ve been told, the disease affects only a small portion of the population – pregnant women and those who may become pregnant in the near future.

The claim that Zika causes birth defects is based solely on “using epidemiological statistics, not rigorous scientific studies of cause and effect,” wrote the Health Ranger in a hit piece exposing the outbreak as an engineered pandemic to justify chemical spraying.

Scientists’ assertions are based on what they believe is a cause-and-effect relationship between the virus and developmental deformities in children born in regions of South America, home to mosquitoes carrying Zika.

But what researchers are failing to acknowledge, is that there are other, more likely causes of microcephaly, a severe birth defect resulting in reduced head size. Various types of pesticides are also known to cause birth defects.

Health officials are intent on spraying deadly chemicals into the air

Unfortunately, health officials have a one-track mind when it comes to fighting Zika – and that involves the administration of more harmful chemicals, regardless of the adverse health and environmental effects.

Reports confirm that Florida (where non-travel related cases of Zika were discovered) intends to begin aerial spraying of a densely populated urban area with a dangerous insecticide called “naled.”

The chemical assault or “campaign” as the mainstream media describes it will cover a 10-mile area including the one-mile-square area just north of downtown Miami, which experts have identified as a “hub” for Zika transmission.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in conjunction with the Florida Health Department recommended the aerial spraying to reduce adult mosquito populations capable of spreading the virus.

CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden said in a recent conference call that he’s concerned “that vector control efforts so far” have not been very effective – likely because the insects have grown resistant to commonly used insecticides – prompting officials to turn to the new chemical, naled.

New insecticide to be aerially sprayed can cause paralysis when inhaled

Naled is an organophosphate insecticide that when it breaks down in animals and the environment, causes “many health effects, both chronic and acute,” according to Toxipedia.org, adding that it acts as a “severe” irritant to the skin and eyes.

The chemical can affect animal and human health through ingestion and inhalation, the latter of which is believed to cause the most damage. Animal studies showed naled to be 20 times more toxic to rats when it was inhaled versus consuming the chemical in food and water.

This is highly concerning considering health officials plan to dispense the insecticide through aerial spraying, placing people at risk for inhaling the toxicant.

Pesticide drift makes this route of exposure even more likely. Researchers at the University of Florida found aerially sprayed naled may travel up to 750 meters away from the initial application site.

Animal studies show that naled exposure causes “chronic nervous system damage resulting in a mineralization of the spinal cord and decreased nervous system enzyme activity that led to partial paralysis.”

The insecticide is also harmful to aquatic life, important insects such as pollinators, and in general is “very toxic to most organisms.”

‘Environmental terrorism’

Proposals to deploy naled in other countries to combat Zika have drawn immense controversy. The Puerto Rican government met intense backlash from anti-fumigation activists when it announced plans to begin aerial spraying of the chemical.

The opposition was so strong that officials eventually agreed to suspend its use. San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulin Cruz said that spraying naled into the air is a form of “environmental terrorism.”

Doctors, farmers and activists expressed grave concerns about the chemical’s health and environmental effects, including its ability to kill honeybees, whose populations are already in sharp decline.

America’s decision to deploy such a deadly chemical to fight a disease that may or may not be causing birth defects is completely irrational and borderline insane. There’s a very good chance it could cause more birth defects, as well as other irreparable conditions.

The CDC states on its website that most people who contract Zika do not have any symptoms, and when they do, they are typically mild and include things like joint and muscle pain, headaches and fever.

“People usually don’t get sick enough to go to the hospital, and they very rarely die of Zika,” the CDC says. “Once a person has been infected with Zika, they are likely to be protected from future infections.”

Read More At: NaturalNews.com







CA.News.Yahoo.com (Reuters)


Seven Days On An Organic Diet Eliminates 90 Percent Of Pesticide Accumulation In Humans

Pesticide poisoning
Source: NaturalNews.com
Isabelle Z
August 3, 2016

Once people fully understand just how toxic pesticides truly are, their first thought is usually, “How can I get these deadly chemicals out of my body?” Pesticide use is so prevalent that it might seem impossible to avoid it entirely upon first glance, particularly when you take the concept of pesticide drift into account. In addition, some people shrug off the evidence of pesticide toxicity, figuring it’s already in their body and it’s too late to do anything about it.

The good news is that this is not the losing proposition that it might initially appear to be. In fact, a 2014 study published in Environmental Research showed that eating an organic diet for just one week reduces the amount of pesticide poisoning in the body by 90 percent. That kind of reduction is nothing to scoff at, and the fact that it can happen so quickly and easily is icing on the cake.

The study, which was carried out by researchers from Australia’s RMIT University, found that people who switched to a mostly – but not entirely – organic diet noted this tremendous reduction. In the study, 13 adults were randomly assigned to eat a diet of at least 80 percent organic food or at least 80 percent conventional food. The diets were switched after a week, with urine samples taken for analysis the day after each diet concluded.

The participants’ levels of dialkylphosphate (DAP) metabolites were tested. These chemicals are produced by your body as it tries to break down organophosphate pesticides. The levels were found to be 89 percent lower after spending a week on a diet that was mostly organic, compared to a week on a largely conventional diet.

Non-organic produce is simply too risky

Cutting your pesticide exposure by 90 percent can bring about very significant benefits to your body and your health. Some organophosphate pesticides were originally developed for use in nerve gas in chemical warfare, and their neurotoxic effect on humans is well-documented.

It’s not just organophosphate pesticides you need to worry about. UC Berkeley cancer cell specialist, Kathleen Collins, recently spoke out about the damage that methyl iodide can cause. This chemical is sprayed on food and even used in some prescription medications. Like organopshophates, it can depress the body’s central nervous system. It can also affect the kidneys and irritate your skin and lungs.

Collins stated that acute inhalation of this toxin can cause pulmonary edema, vomiting, nausea, slurred speech, skin blistering, drowsiness, vertigo and other negative effects. Shockingly, the EPA has yet to classify methyl iodide for its potential carcinogenicity.

Switch to organic today

The truth is that finding organic foods that are truly free of pesticides is difficult. Air movement, soil carryover and certain natural pesticides that are approved for use in organic agriculture make this a difficult task unless you are growing your own vegetables and fruit. That’s why it’s good to know that the nine-tenth reduction was brought about by a mostly organic diet.

However, you still want to reduce your exposure as much as possible, and knowing which foods have a higher probability of containing pesticides can help you make informed decisions. For example, produce that has a thin skin or is grown under the ground is more vulnerable to pesticide contamination. You’ll want to buy organic versions of celery, tomatoes, peaches, apples and strawberries in particular.

Food quality is a real health concern, so be sure to check out Food Forensics, written by Natural News founder Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, to learn more about the many insidious ways harmful chemicals have worked their way into everyday foods.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources include:






Chemical Industry Withholding Crucial Pesticide Toxicity From Regulatory Authorities

Toxic chemicals
Source: NaturalNews.com
L.J. Devon
July 28, 2016

Crucial data on pesticide toxicity is often concealed by the deceptive language put in place by the chemical industry. To bypass regulatory oversight, the chemical industry uses clever marketing language to make their patented chemicals sound legitimate. Some of the biggest agrochemical formulators, including Monsanto, Dow, Bayer and Syngenta, are claiming that their chemicals are safe, while hiding the known compounding, synergistic effects of their pesticides (often hidden in patent applications).

There is no scientific standard or regulation to address the synergy of new pesticide products, the compounding effects of pesticide formulations, or the unknown toxic effects of mixing and accumulating pesticides in the fields. For these reasons alone, pesticide burden and toxicity is far greater than assumed. Over time, as various amounts of pesticides accumulate in ground water and in soil, people become nothing but rats in a DNA-damaging real life lab experiment.

The gray area: Synergistic effects of widely-used agrochemicals lead to compounding toxicity

According to an investigation by the watchdog group, the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), nearly 100 different pesticide products aren’t really safe at all, even after being given a license by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Over a six year time period, the EPA actually green-lighted nearly 100 pesticide products that had synergistic compounds known for “increasing the dangers to imperiled pollinators and rare plants.” Ecological biodiversity and agricultural sustainability are at risk here, but the threats are allowed to continue on.

These synergistic effects occur when two or more chemicals come together and interact in a way that increases and emboldens their toxicity. In tests, one chemical may be non-toxic at a certain level, but when the chemical is combined with another, the newfound toxicity can cause considerable harm to pollinators, rare plants or human health. The EPA may deem that a certain pesticide is safe at a certain level of exposure, but over time, intermixing chemicals can generate much greater toxic effects.

The CBD’s latest report, Toxic Concoctions: How the EPA Ignores the Dangers of Pesticide Cocktails, breaks down the harm that the chemical industry is doing by fooling regulatory authorities and using loopholes to embellish the data.

Over 90 agrochemicals on the market cause synergistic, compounding toxic effects

One of Dow AgroScience’s toxic pesticide products was revoked in 2014 for these reasons. Dow’s Enlist Duo, containing 2,4-D and glyphosate, causes such toxic, synergistic effects to plants, that the EPA revoked its license, even after approving it in October 2014.

Several products patented by Monsanto, Dow, Bayer and Syngenta have similar synergistic effects that the companies fail to properly disclose. No one is really studying and cross checking what these compounding effects can do to the environment and to human beings.

The Center for Biological Diversity investigated 140 patented products from these large chemical companies. Ninety-six of them or (69 percent) demonstrated synergy between the various active chemicals in the products. Of the patented applications, 72 percent of the products demonstrated synergy involving the most widely-used chemicals in agriculture. These chemicals included glyphosate, atrazine, 2,4-D, dicamba and the neonicotinoids thiamethoxam, imidacloprid and clothianidin, among others.

“It’s alarming to see just how common it’s been for the EPA to ignore how these chemical mixtures might endanger the health of our environment,” said CBD scientist Nathan Donley. The EPA doesn’t even cross examine compounding synergistic effects for the many different neonicotinoids.

“It’s pretty clear that chemical companies knew about these potential dangers, but the EPA never bothered to demand this information from them or dig a little deeper to find it for themselves,” he stated.

While the government looks the other way, CWC labs is working toward greater transparency. CWC labs will soon have the capability to disclose not only the heavy metal content of popular food items, but also various pesticide levels. In this way, CWC labs can help the public recognize where they may be consuming toxic, synergistic combinations of agrochemicals.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources include:



Study: Nearly 60 Percent Of Pesticide Sprayers Don’t Follow Instructions For Safe Herbicide Application, Increasing Harmful Chemical Drift

Pesticide drift
Source: NaturalNews.com
Isabelle Z.
July 21, 2016

Given their highly toxic nature and high potential for causing harm, one would like to believe that the application of pesticides is a very strictly controlled procedure, and that those who carry it out are highly trained. Unfortunately, a recent survey shows that those who apply pesticides are not nearly as conscientious as they should be.

A survey carried out by weed specialist Kevin Bradley of the University of Missouri Extension revealed a very unsettling fact: 57 percent of those who apply pesticides in the state of Missouri do not read the label every time they mix and spray these carcinogenic chemicals.

In fact, of the 2,200 people who were surveyed, 16 percent said that they read the labels half the time or less, and 1.2 percent even admitted that they never read the labels.

MU researcher Mandy Bish finds this extremely concerning. Bish says that following labels not only helps sustain a healthy environment and can reduce waste and mistakes, but it can also boost profits and effectiveness, so there really is no reason not to read the label every time.

Labels can change

The Weed Science Society of America has stated that the label on these pesticides is not something you can commit to memory after glancing at it once, and even if you could, labels are known to change.

The survey uncovered many more disheartening statistics. Herbicides that are applied at wind speeds that exceed those recommended on the label can blow into nearby fields, damaging crops and other plants. Yet, 4 percent of applicators never bother to check the wind speed or check it less than half the time.

Meanwhile, two fifths look at trees to check the wind speed, which has been proven to be a highly inaccurate way of judging wind speeds. Devices such as handheld anemometers and other wind speed tools can provide far more accurate results.

Labels typically recommend spraying when the wind speed is in the range of 3 to 10 miles per hour, although there are a few that will go up to 15 miles per hour. Low speeds can also be problematic; wind speeds of less than 3 miles per hour could mean that the ground temperatures are lower than those at higher altitudes, which can create a stable air mass where pesticide droplets can linger and then be moved by wind gusts to plants for which they were not intended.

Many applicators weren’t even aware of the cutoff, with 24 percent saying that 15 miles per hour was the cutoff, and 3.5 percent saying that spraying at more than 20 miles per hour was safe. Some said that it depended on which chemical was being used, while others admitted that they were guided by how far behind they were on getting their work done.

The majority of respondents were not familiar with the specialty crop site registry FieldWatch, which can help pesticide applicators work with bee keepers and crop producers to protect specialty crops.

Pesticide drift can contaminate ‘safe’ foods

The possibility of pesticides drifting onto other crops is just one more reason that food testing by independent parties can be really illuminating. When Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, tested a number of grocery store foods, fast foods, supplements and spices for his book Food Forensics, he found an alarming number of pesticides and other toxic elements lurking in some of the most unexpected places. Staying informed about what you put in your body is absolutely vital if you want to avoid ingesting toxins that can wreak havoc on your health.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Obama Grants EPA More Power To Regulate Harmful Chemicals…But Doesn’t Do Nearly Enough To Protect Kids From Toxic Substances

Chemical Safety Act
Source: NaturalNews.com
David Gutierrez
July 18, 2016

On June 22, President Obama signed into law a massive overhaul of the federal rules for regulating toxic chemicals, implementing a plan to test the safety of 64,000 chemicals currently on the market.

But critics have blasted the bill as a half-measure that moves so slowly as to be practically useless, and it gives a free pass to many of the most dangerous chemicals.

The chemical safety system in this country is so broken that normally apolitical doctors’ organizations are now openly calling for urgent action.

“Before we can prescribe medicine, we have to prove it’s safe,” said Dr. Jeanne Conry, a former president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). “So how come with the chemical industry, we assume everything is safe and have to prove there’s harm?”

Pesticides get free pass

The Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act is considered the first major update to U.S. environmental laws in 20 years, and is also the first major update of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976. The original law has been largely condemned for lacking teeth: Of the 62,000 chemicals on the market in 1976, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used the Toxic Substances Control Act to ban just five.

The Lautenberg Act allows the EPA to test the safety of chemicals now on the market, and sets a timeline for doing so. It also gives the agency the authority to ban certain substances, such as asbestos, and limits the secrecy around certain proprietary toxic chemicals to 10 years.

But, though the law calls for testing of about 64,000 chemicals, it only requires the testing of 20 at a time – a pace so slow as to be meaningless, critics say. Additionally, the new powers given to the EPA under the act do not apply to pesticides.

One of the biggest criticisms of the Lautenberg Act is that it does not change the fundamental problem with chemical regulation in the United States: that chemicals are presumed safe until proven dangerous. There is no requirement that any safety testing be performed on a chemical before it is introduced into consumer or industrial products.

Epidemic of brain damage

Just days after the signing of the Lautenberg Act, the journal Environmental Health Perspectives published a consensus statement by a wide coalition of doctors, scientists and health advocates, including normally apolitical groups such as ACOG. The statement called for a massive overhaul in toxics regulation in the United States, citing a growing epidemic of neurodevelopmental disorders in children.

“We as a society should be able to take protective action when scientific evidence indicates a chemical is of concern, and not wait for unequivocal proof that a chemical is causing harm to our children,” the statement reads.

The consensus statement emerged from an effort known as Project Tendr (Targeting Environmental Neuro-Developmental Risks), and is just one of many such articles slated to be published in top pediatrics, endocrinology, nursing and epidemiology journals in the coming months.

Rates of developmental disabilities are rising faster than can be explained by changes in diagnostic criteria. Between 1996 and 2008, the percentage of children with such disabilities rose from 12.8 to 15 percent.

The Project Tendr statement singles out a variety of toxic chemicals implicated in neurological damage that the government has not adequately acted to remove from the environment. These include organophosphate pesticides, lead in old pipes, flame retardants in household items and clothing, endocrine-disrupting phthalates in plastics and cosmetics and certain air pollutants related to fuel combustion.

In a toxic environment, protect your health with the Health Ranger’s Organic Turmeric Gold from the Natural News Store. Turmeric has up to eight times the antioxidant power of vitamin C, and even more than grape seed extract. This liquid turmeric formula is organic, and is extracted with non-GMO alcohol.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Breakaway Links Of The Day – July 13, 2016

Zy Marquiez
July 14, 2016

Here are yesterday’s links.

Hope all is well.

Psycho-Physics? Consciousness, The Double-Slit Experiment And…
[GizaDeathStar.com | Dr. Joseph P. Farrell]

Disabled Female Cancer Patient Left Bruised & Bloodied By The TSA
[NaturalNews.com | J.D. Heyes]

How We Got It Wrong About Fat!
[iHealthTube.com | Dr. Mary Newport]

U.S. Defense Physicist Speaks About Alien Structures On The Moon
“As somebody in the space defense community, I look on any structure on the moon with great concern because it isn’t ours, there’s no way we could have built such a thing. It means someone else is up there…”

France Vows To Outlaw Monsanto’s Cancerous Glyphosate By 2018 Amid Fears Herbicide Is Destroying Biodiversity, Causing Mass Honeybee Die-Offs
[NaturalNews.com | Wes Maxwell]

Berries Vs. Pesticides In Parkinson’s Disease
[NutritionFacts.org | Dr. Greger]

UN Move Toward World Government With First Ever Globally Televised Leadership Debate

Monsanto, DuPont Unleash Highly Toxic, Drift-Prone Dicamba Herbicide Endangering Public Health & North America’s Food Supply
[NaturalNews.com | L.J. Devon]

Why Helicopter Money Won’t Push Stocks Higher
[OfTwoMinds.com | Charles Hugh Smith]

Corrupt Politicians & Corrupted Money Go Hand In Hand
[ActivistPost.com | Clint Siegner]

Researchers Discover Evidence Of 7,000-Year-Old Head Surgery
Researchers in North Africa have made another remarkable discovery during excavations in a Neolithic Settlement in Omdurman in Sudan. Experts dug up a skeleton with signs of trepanation – a drilling hole in the skull – dating back 7,000 years.

Medical Insanity? – Big Pharma Developing Baby Vaccines For Pregnant Women
[NaturalNews.com | David Gutierrez]

Berries vs. Pesticides in Parkinson’s Disease

Source: NutritionFacts.org
Dr. Greger
July 13, 2016

DESCRIPTION: Berries counteract the neurotoxic effects of pesticides in vitro, potentially explaining why berry consumption is associated with lower risk of developing Parkinson’s disease.

Study: Women Whose Partners Are Pesticide Applicators Have Increased Risk Of Breast, Thyroid, & Ovarian Cancer

Source: NaturalNews.com
Sarah Landers
July 5, 2016

As reported by the Agricultural Health Study (AHS), there is a direct correlation between women who live with pesticide applicators and cancer. Dr. Cathy Lerro and AHS colleagues used information reported by wives of pesticide applicators to take the first detailed look at the use of organophosphate (OP) insecticides and the risk of cancer among women.

About 60 percent of the spouses of pesticide applicators reported having used such pesticides themselves. According to the study, women who reported using OP insecticides were more likely to develop breast cancer than women who never used these insecticides. The most dangerous OPs were:

  • Malathion: The most commonly used OP insecticide is associated with increased risk of thyroid cancer.
  • Diazinon: Another commonly used OP insecticide, this is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer.

This study was the first comprehensive evaluation of the use of these insecticides among women, but it isn’t the first time that cancer has been linked to pesticide use.

Monsanto and cancer

According to Global Research, cancer deaths have doubled for those who live in areas where pesticide intensive GM crops are grown in Argentina. A report by the Ministry of Health in Cordoba, Argentina, documented this disturbing trend and the dramatic spike in cancer deaths, as seen in data collected over five years.

Dr. Fernando Manas of the Genetics and Environmental Mutagenesis Group at the National University in Rio Cuarto, explains that the increasing number of cancer cases in agricultural areas are definitely not a fluke; more than 15 different scientific publications confirm that individuals exposed to pesticides have much greater risk of genetic damage and cancer.

Glyphosate, a herbicide mostly used on genetically modified crops, has been found in samples taken from lakes, soil and rainwater, and is described as “probably carcinogenic” by the World Health Organization. Glyphosate is one of the main ingredients in Monsanto herbicide, Roundup.

But while glyphosate is becoming widely known for its dangerous properties, Monsanto also produced DDT, which has been banned in the U.S. since 1972, after it became clear that it was linked to birth defects. Unfortunately, while the ban is a great thing for future generations, there are long term effects of exposure to DDT that are still affecting Americans today. A study published in 2015 points to a correlation between mothers that were exposed to DDT decades ago, and incidences of breast cancer in their adult daughters in more recent times.

When analyzing the mothers’ blood, researchers found that mothers with the highest levels of DDT exposure had daughters who were 3.7 times more likely to have been diagnosed with breast cancer than women with lower exposures.

Cancer in Napa Valley

According to The Liberty Beacon, residents living in Napa County, California, are linked to higher cancer rates thanks to their exposure to the pesticide-laden vineyards. The report, published by the Cancer Registry of Greater California, states that Napa Valley is a cancer cluster and home to high rates of people suffering with cancer.

Napa Valley has the highest rates of cancer among all of the 58 California counties, with colorectal and female breast cancer rates being abnormally high, and pancreatic and prostate cancer rates that are through the roof. For every 100,000 people in the county there are almost 488 documented cases of cancer.

The vineyards are also polluting the water and soil of Napa Valley – and these toxins are entering into water systems and overburdening people with unsafe, unstudied and compounding chemicals. Napa County is also seeing similar spikes in childhood cancer cases, and there was a 69 percent increase in childhood cancer deaths between 2000 and 2012.

Pesticide intense regions have been proven to be extremely dangerous places to live. And the latest report about women living with pesticide applicators confirms yet again that pesticides are just not safe for use around humans – or the environment.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com