Fukushima & That Russo-Japanese Cooperation


Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D.
May 2, 2017

If you’ve been watching the fallout from the Russo-Japanese Onshen summit last December, some of this news won’t surprise you. Consider the following articles shared by Mr. S.D.:

Japan pursues currency swaps with ASEAN members

BusinessTrends Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Google+ Mail April 27, 2017 3:55 am JST Japan banks to test blockchain-based money transfer

Of course, we’re told the usual story about why Japan would want to negotiate bi-lateral currency arrangements with other Asian nations: it’s all to stop the spread of the Chinese Yuan as a regional (and eventual global) reserve currency. But at the same time it’s experimenting with blockchain technology. By now regular readers here know my thoughts on “digital currencies” and the pressure from Mr. Globaloney to move to a cashless system: no digital system is 100% secure, and yes, I suspect that eventually people will figure out a way through quantum encryption as well. These heresies uttered, the bi-lateral currency story should be read, in my opinion, the same way Mr. Abe’s rearmament should be read: it’s a long term hedge against the increasingly erratic and nutty policies of Empire America, Inc., and thus, while Tokyo is mouthing continued support of Washington, it realizes in the long term that it can no longer count on Washington.

In the process, Japan is remaking the geopolitics of the Western Pacific.

But there was another story that I wanted to include here, and it’s the main focus today; the rest is, so to speak, the context in which to read it. This article was shared by Mr J.S., and it’s hugely important:

Must he do everything? Putin offers to help clean up Japan’s Fukushima

This brings me to my very high octane speculation of the day, for there’s an entirely different context for Japanese rearmament. As regular readers here may also know, I have long regarded Japan (and Germany) as being “turn the screw” nuclear and thermonuclear powers, i.e., as nations that could (and probably have) manufacture all the parts for nuclear and thermonuclear weapons and delivery systems, and simply assemble them quickly – turn the screw – in case of an emergency. As regular readers here may also recall, when the Fukushima disaster occurred, there were those in Japan who suspected – correctly in my opinion – that the disaster may not have been merely an act of nature, for it occurred in an interesting political context: a new government had taken power, and that new government was intent on mending relations with China. That new government was also serious about shutting down the American Empire’s base on Okinawa, long a sore spot in post-war Japanese-American relations. There was talk of state visits of the Japanese Emperor to Beijing. The then US Secretary of Defense, Mr. Robert Gates, issued a statement about these developments that could only be interpreted as a direct threat to the Japanese government. Then, the earthquake and the tsunami. Many Japanese suspected then that the entire incident was deliberate. I maintain that strong suspicion to this day. In the aftermath of Fukushima, there were also a number of articles that revealed that the Japanese may have been conducting a covert nuclear weapons program. Japanese researchers pointed out the peculiar alignment of the earthquake with political events, and the rise of Mr. Abe’s government. Similarly, former assistance secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Catherine Austin Fitts, has pointed out the Indonesian tsunami occurred after a week of inexplicable trades in Indonesian sovereign securities.

In any case, it is in the wake of Fukushima that Mr. Abe has pursued his rearmament plans, setting aside for the first time in postwar history the “percentage cap” on defense spending that was written into the Japanese constitution. This factor has always influenced my thinking that the Fukushima disaster – an ongoing disaster, let us remember – was not merely an act of nature. If anything, it was more like an act of war, with rearmament being Japan’s response. This of course is not a reading of the events that most people – and particularly the corporate controlled media – will accept. Nonetheless, it is the reading and understanding I’ve always used to interpret these events; for me, these events are to be viewed whole: Mr. Gates’ threatening remarks to Japan, Fukushima, and Mr. Abe’s rearmament. And now, we can add Bi-lateral currency agreements to that list.

Which brings us, at last, to today’s high octane speculation about that last article. I want to draw attention to the opening two paragraphs of this rather short, but highly important article:

On Thursday, 27 April, Russian President Vladimir Putin met with Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, in Moscow. A myriad of topics were discussed as part of the talks, many of which had to do with increased Japanese investments into Russia and Russia’s ability to provide Japan with its energy supplies. “Peaceful atomic energy” featured as a possible solution to Japan’s energy needs.

On this basis, Vladimir Putin offered to help clean up the destroyed Fukushima nuclear plant, “with the most modern technology available.”  (Bold emphasis added, italicized emphasis in the original)

This raises two prospects to my mind.

Prospect (High Octane Speculation) number 1:”

When the Chernobyl nuclear disaster occurred, the Soviet Union was in its last long decline; Mikhail Gorbachev was trying desperately to revitalize the system and to head off an economic collapse. Chernobyl occurred and many Russians heroically and sacrificially gave their lives to prevent the disaster from becoming even worse than it was. But Chernobyl also occurred in another unusual political context, one which I’ve also found to have the vague hint of the odor of Fukushima about it, for as the Soviet Union was in its death throes, there were a number of large earthquakes just prior to the final dissolution of the Warsaw pact and the reunification of Germany. One of these occurred in earthquake-prone Georgia, home of the then Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze. At the time I wondered – as some Japanese did after Fukushima – if the Soviet Union had been hit with earthquake weapons.

Assume, for the sake of today’s high octane speculation, that it was. If so, then  by talking about Fukushima, then perhaps Japan and Russia are “comparing notes” and “suspicions”. If so, then this means they could also be discussing – very secretly of course – the means, techniques, and technologies for identifying the use of such weapons.

Prospect (High Octane Speculation) number 2:

Note the final statement that Mr. Putin is offering to help Japan clean up the Fukushima plant “with the most modern technology available.” This implies that the Russians may have developed technologies for nuclear accidents, most likely as a result of the Chernobyl disaster. In this respect, it’s worth recalling that Lt. Col. (US Army, Ret) Tom Bearden has long maintained that the Soviets developed an entirely different technology for the treatment of radioactivity. There have been videos of technologies that alter the rates and degree of radioactive decay (yes, even on ABC’s Good Morning America, years ago). The point here is that Russia may have some technological advantage that is not entirely public record.

And in the context of a North Korean problem, they’re offering to share it with Japan, and to help clean up Fukushima.

And if all this high octane speculation is true – and it’s a mighty big “if” – then there was just another quiet geopolitical earthquake in the Western Pacific.

See you on the flip side…
Read More At: GizaDeathStar.com
________________________________________________

About Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

6/9/2016 – Global Earthquake Forecast – Seismic Activity Spreading Worldwide From West Pacific

Source: Dutchsinse.com
Dutchsinse
June 9, 2016

This weeks earthquake forecast covers the previous areas missed by last weeks forecast. Asia (East of Nepal to Vietnam) has been silent for almost two full weeks with no activity above M4.0 reported, this means the area is under pressure from the East (coming from the Pacific unrest showing around Indonesia and Japan).

This past week, a new swarm of earthquakes spread across Japan topping out at a mere M5.1.. I was certainly expecting more activity than this to develop, but the deep M6.4 below Indonesia appears to have changed things up midway during this past week.

Sumatra was hit as expected, now priming the area North of India and East of India for larger movement. If we go another week with silence across the Himalayan range, then a serious look needs to be taken at what is causing the building “silence” which is really building pressure and not releasing via smaller earthquakes like we would hope to see.

West coast of the United States.. watch near Los Angles, San Diego East to the border with Nevada, South to Cerro Prieto volcano / Salton Sea volcanic buttes. No reported earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest (suspicious to say the least)… thus we need to watch for larger movement to the South at this point in addition to the Pacific Northwest.

The edge of the craton should be on watch for M4.0 activity at the dormant volcanoes and fracking operations across Eastern California, Nevada, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Arizona, Colorado, Texas, Oklahoma, and Kansas. ALL should be hit this week by moderate movement.

The East coast should expect (and has now already received before this video was uploaded) a M3.1 (m2.6 revised) earthquake. Nova Scotia was just struck while this video was uploading to youtube… however we still need to watch this Northeast craton edge location for the remainder of the week.

Europe, the reset button was hit when the M4.5 struck near Mount Dutch supervolcano at the North Pole (not reported by the USGS by the way). Now pressure is rebuilding in South Europe, putting Italy, Greece and the Mediterranean sea back in the mix for M5.0 range (or greater) earthquakes this week. IF we see a large earthquake across North India or the Himalayan range then this may place new additional pressure on Europe.

Keep watch for the silent zones shown in this video for possible large movement this week.

This past week we saw a marked increase in M6.0 range activity (Five event) compared to the previous weeks showing half the amount. If things carry on upwards, we’ll start seeing M7.0 range earthquakes and possibly even new sudden volcanic eruptions in Indonesia , Mexico, and central America.

4/30/2016 — Global Earthquake Forecast — West Coast USA Warning, Europe + Asia Unrest

Source: Dutchsince
April 30, 2016

It appears we may be on the cusp of a larger earthquake to strike this week. After a flurry of M7.0+ earthquakes (and several near M7.0 – upper M6.0) struck around the Pacific plate over the past few weeks, we are now seeing swarms of earthquakes break out at multiple regions around the Pacific.

All links mentioned in the video here:

Earthquakes are related over a distance, striking back to back across the Pacific plate within hours or a day:

http://dutchsinse.com/4282016-it-happ…

Several of the swarms measuring in the M4.0+ range, but the USGS has not reported the events on any of their feeds for some reason. Taiwan, South Japan, Ecuador just to name a few locations where swarms are occurring, but no earthquakes are being reported by the USGS.

Europe showing the stress as well. Now needing to watch Europe for noteworthy movement this week in the M4.0+ range, across the region spanning from the English Channel to Poland and from Switzerland to Serbia (based on the new deep earthquake below Serbia).

United States should see interior plate movement and coastal movement this week across California. Specifically the border of Nevada + California , as well as Southern California near Los Angeles. Keep watch for M5.0+ earthquakes to strike this week. Hope for swarms of lesser events, but plan for a single event in the M5.0+ range. If things get larger, it will be preceded by movement at the interior volcanoes spanning California, Arizona, Utah, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington State.

The North American craton across the United States needs to keep serious watch in the midwest for possible larger movement as well. Specifically the Texas, Colorado, Kansas, and Oklahoma fracking operations. M4.0+ are on the schedule for this week, no way around it in light of the cluster of Earthquakes already showing in the Northwest from Yellowstone to San Francisco ( a sign of pressure pushing from the NW to the SE.. the line of earthquakes denoting where the pressure is coming from and going to.

The East coast of the USA also needs to be on watch for new earthquake activity to strike near Virginia, as well as new activity to strike further Northeast near the US / Canada border with New York and Quebec. M3.0+ could be possible.

If we see larger movement on the West coast , it will cause larger movement in the midwest, which will then cause larger movement on the East coast. The current magnitudes forecast are based upon a M5.0 range earthquake striking California or the Coast of California / Oregon.

____
West Pacific, keep watch in South Indonesia , across the location where the multiple eruptions occurred (which has now gone silent). Taiwan should see noteworthy movement again, as well as central Japan.

This week should be active around the whole Pacific. West and East should both be struck by noteworthy movement greater than what we’ve seen the past 2 weeks.

4/20/2016 — Global Earthquake Forecast — Major Unrest , West Coast USA + Japan

Source: Dutchsinse
April 20, 2016

April 19, 2016

A series of large earthquakes in the M7.0+ range has developed across the Pacific into Asia. Starting with a M7.2 which struck near Burma in Asia, followed by a M6.5, M6.0, andM7.1 which struck South Japan in the West Pacific.. then a M7.8 struck South America along the coast of Ecuador in the East Pacific.

Professionals DENY the relation between all the large earthquakes in the East and West Pacific – incorrectly (and unwisely) calling the earthquakes “coincidences”.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/20…

______

This new earthquake forecast covers the next 7-8 days internationally. Beginning evening April 19, 2016 at 7pm CT.

All areas named in the video need to prepare for the expected magnitudes. West coast named for M5.0 to M6.0 activity. Midwest and East coast USA named for M4.0 to M3.0 activity. Gulf of California to Salton Sea named for M4.0 to M5.0 activity.

Japan named for additional very large earthquake activity above M6.5, as well as Papua New Guinea / Solomon sea, Bangladesh, and North India.

North Italy, France named for noteworthy M4.0+ activity.