Down On The Plantation With Vampires & Ghouls, Inc.

transhumanism

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D.
June 3, 2017

You may recall the story from a few weeks ago about “parabiosis,” the latest “fad” among the technocratic “elites”. Parabiosis is the phenomenon that ingesting through transfusion the blood of younger members of your species somehow contributes to youthful renewal and vitality, and, some have argued, longevity. The practice has captured the attention of billionaire busybody Peter Thiel:

Peter Thiel Is Very, Very Interested in Young People’s Blood

OK. We get it: every billionaire busybody needs a pet project: Gates wants to promote Common Core, and pump people full of vaccines; Zucker-what’s-his-name has recently converted to New World Order Socialist Globaloney (we suspect while reading the late David Rockefailure’s memoirs in the “reading room”). Darth Soros likes to topple governments, foment riots and revolutions, and install neo-Fascist puppet governments, and, in general, has made being a “god” (his term, not ours), his hobby. The late vowel-impaired Zbgnw Brzznsk, while not a billionaire, was certainly a busybody, and closely associated enough with billionaires to have his own pet projects, which were of a similar nature to Darth Soros’.

Against this backdrop, Mr. Thiel’s ghoulish interests in immortality through parabiosis – and let’s face it, that seems to be a polite euphemism for the belief in, and practice of, vampirism – seems relatively tame and harmless…

…except that the idea has now grown to the point of a “parabiosis start-up”, according to this article shared by Mr. G.K.:

A startup is buying teenagers’ blood and selling it to the rich so they can live forever

It comes as no surprise, of course, that the start-up is in Nuttyfornia, and “serves” customers in the Silicon Valley.  What’s interesting here are the admissions of the article:

Growing old: It’s for the poors. Feasting on the vitality of the young in a scientifically questionable effort to live forever?

That, friends, is for the tech elite.

And if that just so happens to mean draining teenagers of their blood for rich old people, so be it. This is a brave-new world, and (the definitely-not-run-by-vampires) Ambrosia LLC is here to help the privileged, paying few conquer it one blood bag at a time.

The plasma’s mostly pulled from teenagers, with a donor-age cap of 25, ensuring that only the freshest of blood is allowed at Ambrosia. As for the customers? They’re only required to be over the age of 35, but Karmazin confirmed many are near retirement age.

But at $8,000 a pop, it’s not a leap to assume his customers believe they are doing more than just contributing to some newfangled anti-aging study. After all, they came for the blood of the young—and that’s exactly what they’re getting.

There you have it. If you’re over 35, have an extra few thousands of dollars, and want to live forever, or at least, participate in a corporate study of parabiosis, you can pay your $8000, roll up your sleeve, and get your transfusion.

If one hasn’t seen the hidden “logic” here, it’s best to state it explicitly, and with the caveat that if I can think of this high octane speculation, they’ve probably thought of it in Nuttyfornia, too, the only difference being they probably think it’s a good idea in Nuttyfornia. For good measure, let’s just tie it to those constantly percolating rumors on the internet that Mr. Globaloney also wants to depopulate the world by a few billion people (mention Georgia Guidestones here), leaving a skeleton crew of about 500,000,000 to serve Mr. Globaloney on his global plantation. One gets the image of Mr. Globaloney sitting on the veranda of his plantation, sipping mint juleps, IV stand with a blood bag next to his leather chair, receiving his daily transfusion of “young blood”. Now, barring the ability to synthesize young blood via some technological means, this will require the establishment of Young Blood Ranches to grow Young People to supply the Young Blood for Mr. Globaloney’s Vampire Project until such time as the ability to synthesize it is achieved. At that point, Mr. Globaloney will no longer need Young People or Blood Ranches for his supply of “ambrosia”, and all that will be shut down for synthetic blood factories. Eventually, of course, Mr. Globaloney will forget how to synthesize it, because he’s just too lazy and stupid, and with no young smart people any more to transfuse his young blood, the world will begin to fall apart because no one remembers how to do or make anything. It’s the old Isaac Asimov “Foundation” scenario all over again. Rehearse that previous list of billionaire busybodies mentioned above, and imagine a world being run by a class of people with the “smarts” of Gates, Zucker-what’s-his-name, Darth Soros and you have a recipe for apocalypse by insanity and irrationality and – after decades of promoting “dumbed down edgykayshun” – stupidity.

Oh… wait… I forgot. They are running the world and following their “plan,” and the world is falling apart.

See you on the flip side…

Read More At: GizaDeathStar.com
________________________________________________

About Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Macron wins…The Question Is, How?

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D.
May 17, 2017

Well, you’ve probably been wondering why I haven’t talked about the French elections. Truth be told, it was in part because of out-of-town commitments, and in part because during the election itself, I “smelled a rat”, but we’ll get back to that.

By now you’ve probably heard that M. Macron, the young up-and-coming-Rothschild-backed whatever-he-is, has become the President of France. Sitting on the sidelines across the pond over here in the USSA, I felt a keen sense of deja vu… it was like the Darth Hillary-Donald Trump affair all over again: one couldn’t muster much enthusiasm for either, but one sensed (or rather, smelled) the distinct odor of corruption hovering over the whole thing. It was Le Pen vs. Macron, that is to say, a French nationalist with ties to a very right-wing, and in my opinion, historically fascist, party, versus stale musty same-old same-old euro-globaloney that people like the Rottenchilds and Rockefailures like to force down everyone’s throats. It was rather like watching an election between Robespierre or Danton, and Marshal Petain, being refereed by General Maurice Gamelin. Ms. Le Pen may have put the finest point on it when, during a debate with Mr. Macron, she said that regardless of the outcome of the election, the next president of France would be a woman, either her, or Frau Merkel. By this “Penine” logic, it would appear Frau Merkel won. Watching the whole circus, I couldn’t help but think “Where’s Talleyrand when you need him?”

Indeed, M. Talleyrand’s ghost, at least, may have been hovering over the election. At one point, a friend of mine reported to me (apparently we were both following the returns) that Mr. Macron’s lead was 66.06%, a percentage he found to be fishier than a mackerel on a moonlight beach: it both shined, and stunk. The problem, of course, is that Mr. Macron’s election, though expected, solves nothing. If anything, it means more of the same, and continued German domination of the European Union, and of France. The can, as they say, has been kicked down the road; German surpluses continue, immigration continues, the French state of emergency continues, and nothing is solved. This, I would aver, is a dangerous state of affairs, and Mr. Macron, like Mr. Trump, in a certain sense is an outsider, though certainly one with the approval of Mr. Eurobaloney and Mr. Globaloney. Better a fake outsider, like Mr. Macron, than a real one, like Ms. Le Pen.

But not all is well, and this is where it gets interesting. One was almost waiting for “the other shoe to drop”, since elections in the west these days look more and more like elections in Bolivia.

The shoe, according to articles that many regular readers here shared with me, just dropped (copy and paste into your browser: http://yournewswire.com/marine-le-pen-election-rigged/  ).  There was also this version of the story, also shared by many others (copy and paste: http://www.vanguardngr.com/2017/05/france-election-2017-fraud-rigged-european-union-masters-deceit-must-annulled-knowledgeable-professor-alexia-thomas-demands/ ).

I have to admit, the stories cause some difficulty for the formation of today’s “high octane speculation.” On the one hand, I do not doubt that there was election fraud in France in favor of Mr. Macron. What I have to question, is why? Most of the data that I saw had him clearly leading Ms. LePen, so why bother to add fraud to the procedure?  It would seem to be a self-defeating project. There are several possibilities here, but the two that stand out to me are a rather obvious one, and one that is not so obvious. The obvious one is that Mr. Macron’s support was actually softer than the public numbers showed, and that he had to be helped along a bit. I’ve suspected the same thing with respect to Darth Hillary in this country, and in particular in her “solid support areas” like Nuttyfornia. Perhaps Mr. Macron was facing similar prospects in the Ile de France and other supposedly “solid support” areas, and hence, according to the first article, torn ballots for LePen were mailed out, while double ballots for Macron were mailed out. The result is predictable: some are saying that he is not the legitimate President of France. And it’s that assessment that brings me to my second option in today’s high octane speculation grab-bag: the pattern of the last American election has been repeated in its broad outlines in France, with one notable exception: (1) allegations of fraud have been accompanied by (2) media spin (in the US case) or media blackout (in France’s case) following by (3) a questioning of the legitimacy of the results in both cases. What remains different, what remains the exception in France’s case, when one compares the two, is that in Mr. Macron’s case, the “deep-state approved” candidate won. So the question is, why the pattern?

I can only speculate here, but my guess highlights the second option: it may be that we’re seeing this pattern because the real goal is to bring constitutional representative republics into doubt and question regardless of whether the “approved” candidate wins or not; already there are calls in the USSA for a constitutional convention, a process I personally think would be a disaster, allowing Mr. Globaloney to walk off with stolen money and saddle the rest of us with bad debt.

France, of course, has been through several constitutions since the French Revolution, and would be much more easily open to such a process. In other words, it is not because it is Ms. Le Pen making these allegations that I am concerned, it is because of the nature of the allegations themselves, and that we may be looking at a contrived pattern, a new ploy in the playbook, by Mr. Globaloney, that I am concerned.

All that’s missing is for the French to blame it on the Russians.

Read More At: GizaDeathStar.com
________________________________________________

About Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Meanwhile…In France…

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Ph.D.
April 28, 2017

By now you’ve probably heard: politics in France has turned a very bizarre corner, for the mainline parties, and their candidates, hardly made an impression. Instead, Emmanuel Macron and Marine Le Pen are headed to a runoff election on May 7th. One poll that I saw had M. Macron winning with 23.9% of the votes, with Mm. Le Pen trailing closely with 21.4% of the votes. Fillon, Melenchon, Hamon came in at 19.9, 19.6, and 6.3% respectively. Here’s the way it looks to the U.K.’s The Guardian:

French election: Macron and Le Pen go to second round – live coverage

Notably, neither Macron nor Le Pen together get a clear majority, but, interestingly enough, neither do the “mainline” candidates, who fell by the wayside. What this means in effect is that whether or not Macron or Le Pen win, they will have to govern either with each other, or by reaching out to those parties led in the last round of elections by Fillon, Melenchon & Co. And that will make governance difficult.  As all of this has been going on, I’ve been receiving a steady trickle of emails from members of this website who live in France, who inform me that many of the same tricks we saw applied in the previous US election have also been rolled out in France: pro-Le Pen comments are censored on social media, pro-EU/globaloney articles are pushed, &c. In spite of this, Le Pen has advanced to round two: the mainline candidates did not.

The question is, why?

In doing a little research for this blog, I came across the following article from Global Research News (copy and paste in your browser:

The Main Issue in the French Presidential Election: National Sovereignty and the Future of France

This article is well worth pondering at length, but I want to draw attention to certain statements critical of the traditional right-left divide, and why French politics looks so peculiar now. Consider, first, the critique of the right:

The upshot is that Fillon’s coherent pro-capitalist policy is not exactly what the dominant globalizing elite prefers. The “center left” is their clear political choice since Tony Blair and Bill Clinton revised the agendas of their respective parties. The center left emphasis on human rights (especially in faraway countries targeted for regime change) and ethnic diversity at home fits the long-term globalist aims of erasing national borders, to allow unrestricted free movement of capital. Traditional patriotic conservatism, represented by Fillon, does not altogether correspond to the international adventurism of globalization.

And now the left:

As the traditional left goal of economic equality was abandoned, it was superseded by emphatic allegiance to “human rights”, which is now taught in school as a veritable religion. The vague notion of human rights was somehow associated with the “free movement” of everything and everybody. Indeed the official EU dogma is protection of “free movement”: free movement of goods, people, labor and (last but certainly not least) capital. These “four freedoms” in practice transform the nation from a political society into a financial market, an investment opportunity, run by a bureaucracy of supposed experts. In this way, the European Union has become the vanguard experiment in transforming the world into a single capitalist market.

The French left bought heavily into this ideal, partly because it deceptively echoed the old leftist ideal of “internationalism” (whereas capital has always been incomparably more “international” than workers), and partly due to the simplistic idea that “nationalism” is the sole cause of wars. More fundamental and complex causes of war are ignored.

For a long time, the left has complained about job loss, declining living standards, delocalization or closure of profitable industries, without recognizing that these unpopular results are caused by EU requirements. EU directives and regulations increasingly undermine the French model of redistribution through public services, and are now threatening to wipe them out altogether – either because “the government is bankrupt” or because of EU competition rules prohibit countries from taking measures to preserve their key industries or their agriculture.

Add to this the following:

Meanwhile, it has become more and more obvious that EU monetarist policy based on the common currency, the euro, creates neither growth nor jobs as promised but destroys both. Unable to control its own currency, obliged to borrow from private banks, and to pay them interest, France is more and more in debt, its industry is disappearing and its farmers are committing suicide, on the average of one every other day. The left has ended up in an impossible position: unswervingly loyal to the EU while calling for policies that are impossible under EU rules governing competition, free movement, deregulation, budgetary restraints, and countless other regulations produced by an opaque bureaucracy and ratified by a virtually powerless European Parliament, all under the influence of an army of lobbyists.

Benoit Hamon remains firmly stuck on the horns of the left’s fatal dilemma: determination to be “socialist”, or rather, social democratic, and passionate loyalty to “Europe”. While insisting on social policies that cannot possibly be carried out with the euro as currency and according to EU rules, Hamon still proclaims loyalty to “Europe”. He parrots the EU’s made-in-Washington foreign policy, demanding that “Assad must go” and ranting against Putin and Russia.

And finally, this comment about Melenchon and Le Pen:

A most remarkable feature of this campaign is great similarity between the two candidates said to represent “the far left”, Mélenchon, and “the far right”, Marine Le Pen. Both speak of leaving the euro. Both vow to negotiate with the EU to get better treaty terms for France. Both advocate social policies to benefit workers and low income people. Both want to normalize relations with Russia. Both want to leave NATO, or at least its military command. Both defend national sovereignty, and can thus be described as “sovereignists”.

The only big difference between them is on immigration, an issue that arouses so much emotion that it is hard to discuss sensibly. Those who oppose immigration are accused of “fascism”, those who favor immigration are accused of wanting to destroy the nation’s identity by flooding it with inassimilable foreigners.

So where’s my daily dose of speculation? A few months ago I predicted that even if Marine Le Pen does not win this bid for the French Presidency, the issues driving her and her party simply will not go away, especially if Mr. Globaloney continues to pursue the same policies with the same playbook, and to ignore the real issue.

That issue, I suspect, is much deeper than even Global Research understands, for the phenomenon is not political, it is cultural and civilizational, and it is, perhaps, not surprising at all that it should be France, and Britain (with the Brexit vote) where we see, if not the strongest opposition to Mr. Globaloney, then at least the most articulate and vocal, for those two nations are, to put it succinctly, the two oldest nation-states in the western world. They represent, so to speak, the core countries of modern western culture: Britain spread Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence and associated cultural institutions throughout the world via the British Empire. In doing so, it also put an end to many practices we would now consider barbaric. And yes, I realize in stating that I have taken a very unpopular view. (If you want to hear the politically correct view, attend an American university.) France, similarly, spread French law and jurisprudence and institutions throughout Europe during the Napoleonic era, which gave rise to the national aspirations of Italy and Germany and helped pave the way for their national unifications in the 19th century.

Why is this distinction between politics and culture important? It’s very simple: if what is driving the Trump train, or the Brexit vote, or, now, the upheavals in French politics, is cultural and not political, then the phenomenon is not going to go away very quickly, nor very quietly, no matter what the politicians do or do not do.

The first politician in the West that truly understands this, and can articulate the cultural vision and aspect of the problem, wins.  Why? Because Mr. Globaloney has no real innate sense of culture. He has to buy it, but does not understand it, nor view himself as belonging to any cultural tradition (except a modern one no older than a century or century and a half). He endows modernist ugliness and promotes it at every turn (think David Rockefailure here, folks, and his “taste” in modern “art”); and people are turning from ugliness.

As for France, this will, indeed, be an election to watch, and I confess some personal emotional involvement; my paternal grandmother was French; I have my great-grandfather’s (her father’s) French prayer book; French composers – Saint-Saens, Rameau, Couperin, and so on – and musicians have enriched my personal life; when I studied organ, I played an edition of J.S. Bach’s organ music edited and prepared by the grand master of French organists (Charles-Marie Widor), and so on. So I watch what goes on there with great personal feeling, because I do not want France to become something one can only read about in history books, another victim of Mr. Globaloney’s hatred of and war on all things of beauty belonging to western culture and tradition.

See you on the flip side…

Read More At: GizaDeathStar.com
________________________________________________

About Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Is Mr. Globaloney About To Clean House?

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
December 7, 2016

One never ceases to marvel at the machinations of Mr. Globaloney, and I suspect that these stories, the shared by Mr. V.T., seem (at least to my mind) to have something to do with it:

Trump administration will pressure foreign states to probe Clinton Foundation

‘German funds given to Clinton Foundation should be returned, used to keep illegal migrants out’

Let’s focus on the first article from the New York Post initially. Note the following:

Foreign governments will be encouraged to investigate the Clinton Foundation’s finances, as many are already turning off money spigots to the scandal-scarred group, The Post has learned.

A source close to President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team told The Post that the new administration plans to pressure the US ambassadors it will name to bring up the foundation with foreign governments — and suggest they probe its ­financial dealings.

Trump said last week that he would not order an investigation of Hillary Clinton’s private e-mail server or her role in the foundation.

But Trump’s statement didn’t preclude the backroom moves to investigate the group.

This is intriguing for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the hint of a possible emerging strategy on the part of the incoming Trump Administration, for President-elect Trump’s administration can hardly investigate a “foundation” with international extent and involvement without the cooperation of foreign governments. The problem is, will they actually do so, and thereby expose their own politicians’ complicity in a growing web of corruption that now, pace Wikileaks, seems to involve everything from bribery and grifting to pedophilia rings? One might, initially, be tempted to say no, this will not work. However, the growing opposition to “business as usual” has not remained confined to American shores; Europe certainly has its own healthy share of the phenomenon, most recently expressed in the growing rise of opposition to the refugee policies of Merkel, Hollande, and Brussels bureaucrats. The political pressure is there, and if those issues can be coupled to the wider issue of corruption among the globaloney crowd, then governments and politicians having dealings with the Clinton Foundation might be hard-pressed to ward off demands for investigations. In any case, those investigations will go forward in the free and independent media, and countries like Russia, as evidenced from the second RT op-ed interview with Lew Rockwell, appear to be willing to chip in their own efforts.

Indeed, Mr. Globaloney’s image is so tattered right now, that he may have decided a little house-cleaning, and some sacrifices (a.k.a., the Clintons) are in order just out of the sheer necessity to convince people that they are, indeed, trying to right past wrongs and clean house. Here too, the corporate controlled media versus the free and independent media enter the picture, for another casualty of the recent American political circus was the corporate media itself, which showed obvious, and indeed almost psychotic and pathological bias, for Mrs. Clinton. The  current recount push being only one example, for as Mr. Trump has recently pointed out, most indications seem to be that voter fraud was largely in her behalf, raising the possibility that she did not win the popular vote either.

So it is an intriguing strategy that I am suggesting that Mr. Trump and his advisors are pursuing: internationalize the effort, and to the extent possible, involve Mr. Globaloney in the effort to clean his own rancid house.

Which brings us to the second article, the op-ed piece from RT’s interview with Lew Rockwell, noted American political commentator. Note the following exchange and Mr. Rockwell’s suggestive response:

RT:What’s your take on these recent (events)? 

Lew Rockwell: … Trump was right about Hillary being crooked, about the Clinton foundation being crooked, and I don’t think we’ve begun to see how much money was actually paid. So we know from the Department of the Environment and from this other German agency – millions of Euros – they got much more money than that from all different governments. The question is: why politics are corrupt. It is not unusual for politicians to be paid off. They thought they were buying – probably the most benign explanation – they thought they were buying preferment from the future Clinton administration. This proves what the Clinton Foundation actually was – a way to bribe Hillary Clinton and her aide Bill Clinton.

But I think maybe there is other stuff going on too. This was obviously not German government agencies giving the money, even though it was the poor taxpayers footing the bill. But it was individuals determining this to happen. Were these guys going to personally profit; what kind of crookedness is there on the part of the German politicians and German bureaucrats, as well as the Americans?  They should just alert us to the nature of politics, why we don’t want political decisions being made in these kinds of areas, why we don’t want bribes being paid. I am glad for the exposure… And how about getting it back since they didn’t get the favors they expected, really shouldn’t the Clintons give this money back to the German people? Maybe [the German people] could use it to keep some of the migrants out. That would be a nice change. (Emphasis added)

And there one has, perhaps(to continue in my line of high octane speculative reasoning) the other component of the strategy: drop the memes into public discussion, and drive the creation of pressure at the popular level, in this case, the meme being “you took the money, and didn’t deliver, now we want it back.” The article goes on to note that the German government had no preparations or contacts with the Trump campaign, so certain was it of a Hillary victory, thus emphasizing the geopolitical fallout and implications of his candidacy. Indeed, if one recalls, Russia almost alone was sending messages to both candidates during the process, and it was Mr. Putin who reached out to Trump shortly after his victory, while Hollande and Merkel whined and complained. In any case, Rockwell is here suggesting the real problem: the Mafia-like nature of contemporary politics in the west. He is not, of course, so naive as to believe that…

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com
________________________________________________________________

Profile photo of Joseph P. Farrell

About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

New US Space Force: Soldiernauts?

NEW US SPACE FORCE: SOLDIERNAUTS?
GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
August 5, 2016

There’s so much meat to ponder in this article that I don’t know where to begin, but much of it goes directly to my hypothesis, which I have outlined in recent blogs and interviews, that it appears Mr. Global is changing his operational and strategic method to implement a global order from the bottom-up approach (Earth first, then space), to a top-down approach (space first, then Earth). This article was shared by Ms. B.H., and it’s well worth pondering very carefully:

Top Guns in orbit: US Air Force reveals plan for ‘Space Mission Force’ to protect America using satellites

There’s actually two different threads in this article that I want to focus our attention on. First, the thread of the space force and its implications itself, especially the implications that touch upon the hypothesis of Breakaway civilizations and secret space programs. Second, the thread relating to Mr. Global’s plans and my hypothesis of a change of strategy.

With respect to the first thread, consider these statements from the very beginning of the article:

They could be a combination of Top Guns and Thunderbirds – protecting the Earth using swarms of smart satellites.

To be called Space Mission Force,  the U.S. Air Force Space Command has revealed its plans for a new type of soldier.

The group will utilise existing satellites and weapons to ‘operate as warfighters’ in orbit.
(Emphases added)

Naturally, there are many ways to parse and interpret that last italicized statement. However, one of them is surely that the USA is planning an actual space force of soldiers designed to deploy “in orbit”, i.e., in space itself. From here, it’s a short process to discover why such a force would be desired and needed: to perform tasks of repair that only humans can perform, and under conditions of military operations, i.e., under conditions when people are shooting at you. Additionally, such a force could conceivably be used for special types of assault and offensive operations.

But if one parses and interprets these statements in this way, it raises certain implications, not the least being that a means of rapid deployment of such “soldiernauts” will either have to be developed, or, conversely, that it is already covertly available. Enter the breakaway civilization/secret space program meme. Most readers here probably recall the affair of UK computer hacker Gary McKinnon, who allegedly hacked into US Department of Defense computers, and discovered (so he claims) indications of such a space force, with its own ships and crews, already in existence. If his claims are true, then what one is looking at here is simply the public acknowledgement and admission of such, albeit in a roundabout way. But lest we forget, there is actual “mainstream” confirmation of McKinnon’s allegations, and they come from no less than Ronald Reagan himself, who in his memoirs wrote that when he took the presidency and was briefed on American capabilities, he was told that the USA had the capability to “spacelift” approximately 300 people, an amount far in excess of America’s then publicly-known space shuttle spacelift capability. Of course, Reagan’s comments could be a deliberate “disinformation” plant, or they could be the truth. It’s up to the reader to decide.

When one turns to the second thread in this article – the ongoing dispute between Russia and the USA, with Russia’s recent decision to publish the locations of all US satellites – one begins to see, I suspect, a little more confirmation of my hypothesis that Mr. Global is changing the strategy:

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com
__________________________________________________________________

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Meanwhile, On Earth, Mr. Global Salivates Over The Prospects Of The…

 MEANWHILE, ON EARTH, MR. GLOBAL SALIVATES OVER THE PROSPECTS OF THE ...
Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
August 4, 2016

Now it’s Africa’s turn to  go the way of Europe to be amalgamated into one huge bloc, and we’ll get to my “predictions” and high octane speculations in a moment. This article was spotted and shared by Ms. S.H.:

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/07/step-towards-united-states-africa-au-launches-africa-passport-create-borderless-continent.html/embed?wmode=transparent#?secret=inmPBX7u0R

Now you’ll notice here that the same old globalist methodology and rationalizations are in play(welcome back, colonialism!): a common passport is being issued to allow the “free flow of goods, services, and peoples” in the African Union:

However, as this confusion is rocking Europe, the continent of Africa is pursuing vision to achieve what Europe seems to be abolishing. Africa’s continental body, the African Union (AU) has announced that it has launched for the first time, a single passport for all citizens on the continent. The AU consists of 54 countries. The only country in Africa, which is not part of the Union, is Morocco. Morocco opted out of the Union after the AU recognized Western Sahara as a sovereign nation, as Morocco claimed Western Sahara is part of its territory.

The Union said in a statement that “This flagship project has the specific aim of facilitating free movement of persons, goods and services around the continent – in order to foster intra-Africa trade, integration and socio-economic development.”

According to the Union, the all-African passport represents a key plank of the Agenda 2063 action plan, which emphasizes the need for greater continental integration, based on the vision of the parent organization of the AU called the Organization of African Unity (OAU).

In other words, what’s good for the European goose is good for the African gander.

So what’s my high octane speculation and prediction here?

Well, for one thing, expect what is going on in Europe with the expansion of Islam and the resulting culture crisis and backlash in Europe to occur in Africa, on steroids. Some nations in Africa have attempted to stem the tide, but one wonders how this free flow of persons across borders will work when this rising tide confronts the various tribal cultures in Africa.

In the background there is hovering another development, and one that portends even more great power conflict, for the USA is quickly trying to expand its Africom command, and China, of course, has been actively involved on the continent, trying to secure markets and attempting the opposite approach of the US: building roads, schools, and so on. More recently, China has projected military force into the region by basing troops on the African side of the southern end of the Red Sea.

So how do these two players interact with the growing AU project? Expect the same patterns evident in Europe…

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com
_________________________________________________________________

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Secret Space Program Conference [2015] – Catherine Austin Fitts – The Space Based Economy HD

TheBreakaway
Zy Marquiez
July 7, 2016

Being one of the headliners of the SSP Conference, former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Catherine Austin Fitts [Solari.com], went next to last on the final day of the conference.

Being the monetary guru of the conference, her presentation is thus named “The Space-Based Economy.”

Fitts’ presentation begins with a rough outline of what the presentation will cover:

– Looking for the Money
– Mapping the Economics
– Building out The Low-Earth Orbit Infrastructure
– Unanswered Questions: Closed vs. Open Economy
– Practical Implications To You

From the outset Fitts’ commences by explaining how she got entangled into this abstruse subject.  At the nascent point of her quest, she began simply by looking for $4 Trillion dollars that went missing from the US Government.

She proceeds to take a cursory glance at the amount of money spent in space by the most powerful economies.   Thereafter, she hones in on a more disturbing machination, which regards how much money the military has ‘lost track of’.  This outrageous incident, which isn’t the only one, adds up to the tune of $2.3 Trillion dollars.

There in Fitts’ tackles this monumental issue by delineating the fact that a whopping $40 Trillion dollars is what she estimates the black-budget brigade has siphoned from private households as well as the US Govt. and other places.  The obvious question she poses:  “Where did it go?”

She alludes that that enormous amount of money would be sufficient to run a global government behind the scenes, it could have gone into space, or a few other places such as the black budget and such.

With a bit of humor, she picks on Lockheed Martin with a few of caricature jokes  for obvious reasons, given their stature as contractor and highly probable tentacles within off-world ventures.

Fitts’ proceeds to show a chart which shows a comparison between the NASDAQ, the SP500, & Lockheed Martin’s stock, as well as pointing out a few notable points regarding these three charts.

After that she speaks of a waver that the National Security Advisor can give that will allow him to delegate to companies the ability to wave the compliance of SSC Transparency Rules.  This is quite intense, because with that any company can undertake black budget projects and many other dealings.

Fitts’ splits up the economy into two regions, the Low-Earth Orbit, which manages the flows related to resources primarily on Earth.  This is where 90% of the economic action is.  The other area is space exploration, and she says its profoundly different economics between L.E.O. and space exploration.

One interesting aspect is her take on exploration.  She mentions how exploration has always usually been a risky venture historically, and can be quite detrimental to a society.  This would only be more exacerbated in space.  Due to that she proceeds to touch lightly upon the fact that the establishment needs to figure out how to handle the political/economic risks of these ventures.

As an example, she talks about how Scottland undertook ‘The Darien Project’, which wound up being a bust, and wiped out 20-25% of the capital of the country.  This is a small, but incisive reminder into the risks of explorations that a country needs to heed.

Knowing the incoming Space Race that is coming, the establishment is pushing heavily into reigniting the interest of space.  Because of this, space ports are popping up everywhere.  Fitts covers a few aspect of this new corporate space race.

Subsequent to that Fitts covers the crucial need to minimizing cost of delivering payloads into space.  In the past, control of the sea lanes was linked to the economy, but now, coupled with that the satellite lines are the ones that are in need of policing.  Due to that, there is an incoming traffic jam in space of countries that are realizing the need of putting satellites into orbit and the advantages that can have due to the Snowden revelations.

The competitive aspect of manufacturing is then addressed quite well by Fitts.  She talks about “..building a domestic manufacturing infrastructure not just here but in other countries around the world where they can break through, break free, a huge amount of industrial capacity so they can support the cost of going not space.”  Japan’s tech giants are mentioned as one of the ones carrying this out.

One of the most notable points follows:  “The goal of what is going on in that space is…about the control and concentrations of flows on planet Earth including cashflow.”  This is because the control and concentration of cashflow are arguably the two largest factors to focus upon regarding the space-based economy.

The amount of total satellite launched in space is covered thereafter, with Russia, China, and USA focused on.  Satellite Industry Revenues is also mentioned.  The focus should be on the digital information going through the satellite.

A thorough Chronology of the Building Out Of GPS is there in shown.  Coupled with that she seeps into the supporting digital systems and the “smart grids” that support the satellites.  The main point behind all those tools is “Who can get the data from here to there the fastest”.   This is the foundation for space-based operations in the Low-Orbit sector.   One highly notable bullet point was the one covering Weaponry, which included: Surveillance, Intelligence, Coordination And Unmanned Forces [Drones, Robots]; Entrainment and Electronic Harassment; Offensive and Defensive Weaponry.   This is in order to be able to use force with unmanned capabilities from a distance, if the need to go to a defensive posture arises.   Soft weapons are also mentioned as a cause for concern given their increasing use.  If am not mistaken, Fitts’ had an interview with Charles Hugh Smith covering some aspects of Soft-Weaponry on her Solari Website.  All this centers upon mind control of the individual.

Another profound quote by Fitts is shared in regards to power, and money:

“If you look at the competition for resources globally, the shift of investment eastward means that the military must enforce.  Nobody puts money where they can’t enforce.  That means, as the money moves globally, so must the military.  It’s simply the nature of the investment model.”
– The Solari Report

This is all leading to a rebalancing of power that is currently taking place globally.

Sinking her teeth into an abstruse aspect of this global move, Fitts focuses thereafter on the rise of internet uses globally.  As she mentions, in its nascent stages in 1995, less than 1% of the Global Population was on the internet.  However, in 2005, there were 1 Billion internet uses.  This had tripled by 2014, and increased slightly more thereafter.  All of this has come due to the lower cost of smartphones nowadays, which has aided greatly in this user expansion.

“Why is this important?  One of the most important drivers  of economic in space and in the low-earth Orbit is what?  Fiat currency.”  All of this is headed towards a global digital currency of some effect.

The debt-based fiat game is then talked about quite incisively as to how that plays out in the global scheme, and how that interludes into global control and military capacity.

The One-Way Mirror is the addressed by Fitts’.  This regards the surveillance platform that is being implemented that is so intrusive, so  far-reaching, and so breathtaking that is beyond astonishing.  Due to that, she focuses on the importance of knowing about entrainment, subliminal programming, financial manipulation, soft weapons, and aspects of the CIA/NSA/Google [Nafeez Ahmed] and more.

Women are thence focused upon Fitts, and it’s quite fascinating, as the establishment has made an enormous effort to play the woman card.  What is meant by this is that women in every aspect o the world are being promoted.  This is because the global female population has a GNP that’s bigger than China.  Essentially, women control an enormous economic arm of the globe.  This is something that is going to play itself out from here on out.

Fitts continues: “Control is not control of countries and municipalities or government leaders.  Control is control of every one of you and I using racial based technology, artificial intelligence and a lot of these different technologies.”

The global fight for the internet is then addressed by Fitts.

Subsequently, she covers the Peace Of Westphalia.

The Peace Of Westphalia [1648] was the political agreement which was the end of the medieval period, because it came up with a philosophy of sovereignty that gave a monopoly of force on a the sovereign government.  Before that a lot of nation states and mercenaries were able to field power.

Soon thereafter, Fitts moves from there to Unanswered Questions: Is Earth An Open Or A Closed Economy?

– Who Owns The Debt?
– What Is The Gold Inventory?
– Who Is behind The One Way Mirror?
– Who Controls The “Smart Grid?”
– Black Budgets, Dark Pools, Hidden Systems Of Finance: Is There Such A Thing As Markets?
– Digital Currencies: Who Controls?
– What Are The Economic Costs Of Disinformation?

The above questions are delved into by Fitts’ in a poignant manner.  She makes some interesting, and yet, quite provocative statements regarding the above points/questions.

Catherine Austin Fitts finalizes her presentation with all the things the individual can do.  This is my most favorite aspect of her presentation because she is always hammering on the importance of what people can do at the individual, local level of their community.   Not from a fear point of view, not from a doom-and-gloom, but in a way that is realistic, practical and energetic way.

Jon Rappoport also hones in on this quite regularly in his website NoMoreFakeNews.com and on JonRappoport.wordpress.com.

If you wish to learn more about Fitts’ work, you can go to Solari.com, which is her website, or you can goggle Youtube to watch many of her interviews.

Catherine Austin Fitts’ work is highly respected here, and with great reason.  Her approach is always reasonable, methodical, fearless and extremely educational in many ways.

If you have time please check out her work.  You will not be disappointed.