A Brief History of Fake News

Source: TheCorbettReport
James Corbett
August 8, 2017

TRANSCRIPT AND SOURCES: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=23653 [NOTE: This video was produced for BoilingFrogsPost.com on October 31, 2012. It is being made available in its entirety here for the first time.] Military deception is an ancient and time-honoured art. Throughout recorded history, military commanders have attempted to spread false news and seed false information as part of psychological warfare operations to deceive, confuse, and demoralize the enemy…

Advertisements

Conflicting Messages From NATO & EU


Source:GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
November 30, 2016

As readers here can tell, over this past week I’ve been largely concentrating on geopolitical stories, particularly those that seem to have been due to blowback and implications from the American presidential election/referendum. In this respect, there are three articles that caught my attention this week, because they are sending out mixed messages. They were shared, respectively, by Mr. E.O., Mr. T.M., and Ms. C:

‘Russia is not our enemy’ – NATO Navy Commander

The EU is pursuing defense policies that rely less on the US after Trump’s win

European Union Confirm EU Army Will Launch In 2017

Let’s start with the last article first. Notably, the expressed reason for creating a “pan-European” military is the BREXIT vote, which, as we’ll see, is probably nonsense, but a convenient way for the EU globaloney crowd to continue pouting and to strengthen their hand in the difficult negotiations ahead. The real reasons are expressed in the second article, namely, the election of Donald Trump. To be sure, this constitutes another convenient excuse, for the idea of a common European military has been the goal all along. Mr. Trump simple affords an excuse to “speed the process up”, as a common military gives a bureaucratic reason and glue to keep the otherwise faltering EU together.

From a strategic point of view, the creation of a European army is necessary, at least, if the EU’s pretensions to being the “third way” or “third superpower” between the US and Russia (or, depending on one’s lights, China), are to have any weight. With the loss of Great Britain to the project, Europe’s sole remaining acknowledged thermonuclear power is France, although most regular readers here are aware that I personally think Germany is also a thermonuclear power, a thing kept relatively quiet by the corporate globalist media, perhaps in the name of political “expediency.” More importantly, the European powers individually have neither the strategic depth of a Russia, China, USA or even Brazil, nor do any of them individually have a population base of more than 100 million. If Europe is to project deterrent power of a conventional military nature to any of the powers that do have these things, it simply will require a military on a large population base, and that is only possible with an integrated European military.

The effectiveness of such a military integration, however, is in doubt. It will require integrated armaments industries (a step towards which was taken with recent mergers of French and German armaments concerns in a kind of modern version of a Schneider Creusot-Krupp monster, if one can imagine such a thing; the Airbus consortium of companies already being a framework for potential collaboration in aerospace military matters, and of course there’s the “Eurofigher”), but more importantly, a way to manage efficiently the units of so many different nationalities and languages. Think of it as a kind of Imperial and Royal Austro-Hungarian army, on steroids, probably similarly based on two “official languages”, in this case, not German and Hungarian, but rather German and French. And of course, all this will mean further erosions of national sovereignty in Europe, and in the current political climate, that could become very problematic. Does the average Frenchman want decisions for war or peace being made by Brussels bureaucrats, given their track record of…

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com
________________________________________________________________

Profile photo of Joseph P. Farrell

About Joseph P. Farrell

Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

 

News & Views From The Nefarium – June 16, 2016 – Is American Military As Powerful As It Seems On Paper? What About Russia’s?

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
June 16, 2016

The Russians are shooting down our drones over the Crimea… but is that the real story here?

Russians Have Already SHot Down Numerous US Drones Violating Crimean Airspace

Shock Finding: 30 Percent Of US Military Damaged By Anthrax Vaccine

Anthrax vaccines

Source: NaturalNews.com
Isabelle Z.
June 14, 2016

The topic of vaccines tends to inspire strong feelings in people one way or the other, and the admissions made by a CDC whistleblower in the recent documentary VAXXED certainly added fuel to the fire. However, one aspect of the vaccine debate that many people can agree on is that forcing experimental vaccines on anyone is a questionable practice at best.

In one of the most egregious examples of this, the FDA used its authority to force American military personnel to get an experimental anthrax vaccine while a civil lawsuit challenging the authority of the Department of Defense to mandate unapproved vaccines was pending.

Since 1998, countless service personnel have reported becoming ill after being given a series of vaccines for anthrax before Middle East deployment. Those who refused to get the jab faced punishments including discharge.

According to MintPress News, 30 percent of those in the military who received the vaccine ended up with vaccine damage referred to as Gulf War Syndrome, and the issues caused were career-ending for some, particularly pilots.

MintPress News cites the University of Minnesota’s Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy’s 2002 report, which says that the mandatory anthrax vaccines caused many Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve members to transfer or leave the military altogether.

85 percent of troops noted adverse reactions

Data from a survey by the General Accounting Office (GAO) of Congress showed that 85 percent of the troops who were subjected to anthrax shots experienced adverse reactions, which is significantly higher than the 30 percent the manufacturer claimed. The survey involved a random sample of more than 1,200 guard and reserve personnel.

This prompted the GAO to recommend that the DoD institute an “active surveillance program for vaccine reactions.” According to GAO estimates, 77 percent of aircrew who received the shot would not have done so if they had been given a choice.

Symptoms and concerns brushed aside

Gulf War Syndrome is the name given to the set of symptoms experienced by military personnel involved in the Gulf War, and it includes chronic symptoms such as cognitive problems, muscle pain, fatigue, diarrhea, and rashes. Adding insult to injury, the military has called it an “emotional ailment” despite its measurable physical manifestations.

While some higher-ups have tried to explain Gulf War Syndrome as the result of conditions on the ground, soldiers who fought there from Israel, Egypt and Kuwait did not end up suffering from it. Interestingly, those soldiers did not receive Anthrax vaccines.

One third of vets afflicted

The National Academy of Sciences reports that more than one third of vets in the first Gulf War suffer from the ailment, and a 2009 study in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry suggested that the main culprit could be aluminum hydroxide, which was an adjuvant in the anthrax vaccine.

Continue Reading At: NaturalNews.com