Zika Vaccine: Wach-Out – It Will Alter Your DNA

DNA3
Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com | JonRappoport.wordpress.com
Jon Rappoport
March 24, 2017

First, I’ll lay out a little background—

In many previous articles, I’ve established there is no convincing evidence the Zika virus causes the birth defect called microcephaly. (Zika archive here)

Basically, Brazilian researchers, in the heart of the purported “microcephaly epidemic,” decided to stop their own investigation and simply assert Zika was the culprit. At that point, they claimed that, out of 854 cases of microcephaly, only 97 showed “some relationship” to Zika.

You need to understand that these figures actually show evidence AGAINST Zika. When researchers are trying to find the cause of a condition, they should be able to establish, as a first step, that the cause is present in all cases (or certainly an overwhelming percentage).

This never happened. The correlation between the presence of Zika and microcephaly was very, very weak.

As a second vital step, researchers should be able to show that the causative virus is, in every case, present in large amounts in the body. Otherwise, there is not enough of it to create harm. MERE PRESENCE OF THE VIRUS IS NOT ENOUGH. With Zika, proof it was present in microcephaly-babies in large amounts has never been shown.

But researchers pressed on. A touted study in the New England Journal of Medicine claimed Zika infected brain cells in the lab. IRRELEVANT. Cells in labs are not human beings. The study also stated that Zika infected baby mice. IRRELEVANT. Mice are not humans. And these mice in the lab had been specially altered or bred to be “vulnerable to Zika.” USELESS AND IRRELEVANT.

All this fraud set the stage for the Zika DNA vaccine. Yes, it is under development. It is, in fact, an example of the next generation of vaccines. And this is why you should watch out.

Here is an excerpt from a US National Institutes of Health press release (8/3/16) (here, here, and, the booster to the DNA vaccine here):

“The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health [NIH], has launched a clinical trial of a vaccine candidate intended to prevent Zika virus infection.”

“Scientists at NIAID’s Vaccine Research Center (VRC) developed the investigational vaccine — called the NIAID Zika virus investigational DNA vaccine — earlier this year.”

“The investigational Zika vaccine includes a small, circular piece of DNA — called a plasmid — that scientists engineered to contain genes that code for proteins of the Zika virus. When the vaccine is injected into the arm muscle, cells [in the person’s body] read the genes and make Zika virus proteins, which self-assemble into virus-like particles. The body mounts an immune response to these particles, including neutralizing antibodies and T cells. DNA vaccines do not contain infectious material — so they cannot cause a vaccinated individual to become infected with Zika — and have been shown to be safe in previous clinical trials for other diseases.”

SYNTHESIZED GENES ARE INJECTED INTO THE BODY.

That’s why it’s called a DNA vaccine.

Beginning to wonder what this is all about?

It’s about PERMANENTLY ALTERING YOUR DNA.

It’s about altering the DNA of every person on the planet who is vaccinated.

New York Times, 3/9/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” The article describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”

“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”

“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.” [That was nearly two years ago.]

“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.”

Here is the punchline: “The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.”

Read that again: “the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.”

Alteration of the human genetic makeup.

Not just a “visit.” Permanent residence. And once a person’s DNA is changed, doesn’t it follow that he/she will pass on that change to the next generation of children, and so on, down the line?

The Times article taps Nobel laureate Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.”

By now you should be seeing the larger picture. A virus (Zika)…

Never proved to cause anything…

Becomes the occasion for developing and injecting a vaccine…

That is actually a group of synthetic genes…

Which will alter your DNA.

And that program implies the possibility of a far wider operation:

Covertly, any genes can be injected in the body and called vaccination. Untold numbers of experiments to alter human DNA can be run. Experiments to create more obedient and passive people, more intelligent and talented people, soldiers who have much higher pain thresholds and who will accept orders without thought or question…

And if you think that is science fiction, read these words from biophysicist Gregory Stock, former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine, to get a glimpse of what “the best and the brightest” are considering:

“Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future.”

Brave New World? Yes, if Brave means Insane.

Read More At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________________________

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Advertisements

The truth about Zika: It’s a grand medical hoax

Zika virus

Source: NaturalNews.com
J.D. Heyes
October 31, 2016

One of the most interesting things about the Zika virus is that it is not a new ailment. It was first discovered in monkeys in 1947 and in humans in 1952, according to a fact sheet from the World Health Organization.

While researchers have admittedly probably learned more about the virus since it was first identified, some of the health problems now being associated with Zika – such as microcephaly in newborns – have never before been seen, leaving many to wonder if there isn’t some sort of conspiracy being devised by globalists to suit their political agenda.

For instance, according to TruthWiki, an investigative site that has recently delved into the history of the disease, populations in the past that were heavily infected with Zika never reported a single case of a newborn with a shrunken head.

The current outbreak is far from being the only one. In the 1960s, outbreaks occurred in Oceania and Southeast Asia. And in 2007, the so-called “Yap epidemic,” which occurred on the Yap main island – part of the Caroline Island chain in the Western Pacific – infected three-quarters of the population. But no cases of newborn birth defects, like microcephaly, were reported. So the current hysteria over microcephaly allegedly being tied to Zika appears completely unwarranted.

Will we see another ‘swine flu fiasco’ with the Zika vaccine?

The same year, TruthWiki reported, using funding that was provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a genetically altered version of the virus was developed by Oxitec (Oxford Insect Technologies), a British biotechnology company. Roughly two years later, in the fall of 2009, Gates helped usher in the first outdoor trials of genetically modified transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, which are the species known to transmit the disease. They were released ostensibly to fight the spread of mosquito-borne diseases including dengue, yellow fever and Zika, among others. The plan was to get the GM mosquitoes to mate with females to produce offspring that would die soon after birth, thereby halting the spread of the disease. But, TruthWiki noted, there was another agenda.

In May 2014, the WHO and the Brazilian government colluded to spread propaganda that there were nearly 1 million “suspected” cases of Zika in Brazil, and recommended that the deadly poison pyroproxyfen be spread, to include areas of drinking water. The propaganda disseminated was that since mosquitoes were breeding in those areas of standing water, then they too had to be treated with the chemical, which was then spread primarily over poverty-stricken areas.

The next thing we know, scores of cases involving microcephaly in Brazil began cropping up. And they were then blamed on Zika. Coincidence? Many think not. What’s more, there were really only about 500 children born malformed – not 5,000-plus as originally reported, TruthWiki points out.

As TruthWiki notes further, Zika is a mild viral infection – always has been – and resembles the typical cold or flu. Most of those afflicted with it suffer a low-grade fever, some pain in their joints, a skin rash and conjunctivitis. In other cases, people have no idea they’ve even been infected. If symptoms appear at all, they may last up to a week. But like chicken pox, a one-time Zika infection can provide lifelong immunity. While severe cases of Zika may require hospitalization, they are rare, as are Zika-related deaths.

Overkill?

And yet, despite the virus’ relatively mild symptoms, the U.S. government is set to pay a Japanese Big Pharma firm as much as $300 million to develop a vaccine, Natural News reported recently. If that’s not overkill, then nothing is – especially given the fact that most vaccines contain harmful substances and preservatives.

Another disease outbreak “emergency.” Another vaccine with even more harmful chemicals and preservatives will go on the market. In fact, due to the “gravity” and “dire nature” of the Zika emergency, we may even see mandatory vaccination as we did with the swine flu fiasco in the mid-1970s. Then, a mandatory program of vaccination for the illness, which only killed one person, led to a dramatic spike in Guillain-Barre syndrome, in which the immune system attacks the nerves, causing paralysis. Ironically, today the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is claiming that Zika may be causing GBS.

Propaganda anyone?

Read the entire TruthWiki report on the Zika hoax here.

Sources:

WHO.int

TruthWiki.org

USAToday.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

The Zika Files: DEET is part of a binary chemical weapon targeting your brain for destruction [VIDEO]

DEET
Source: NaturalNews.com
Mike Adams
September 7, 2016

I’ve just released a hard-hitting mini-documentary that explains how DEET insecticide is one part of a binary chemical weapon that targets your brain for destruction.

The other part of that chemical weapon is found in carbamate pesticides which inundate the non-organic food supply. Once you combine these two, you get hypertoxicity to brain cells via “acetylcholesterase inhibitor chemicals,” leading to mass confusion, fear, memory loss and an inability to think for yourself.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

‘Safe’ Zika Pesticides Nukes Millions Of Bees

QuestionEverything2
Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappoport
September 1, 2016

Millions of bees have just died in South Carolina, because Dorchester County officials decided to attack Zika mosquitoes from the air, from planes, with a pesticide called Naled.

The Washington Post reports, in an article headlined: “‘Like it’s been nuked’: Millions of bees dead after South Carolina sprays for Zika mosquitoes.”

“The county acknowledged the bee deaths Tuesday. ‘Dorchester County is aware that some beekeepers in the area that was sprayed on Sunday lost their beehives,’ Jason Ward, county administrator, said in a news release. He added, according to the Charleston Post and Courier, ‘I am not pleased that so many bees were killed.’

That’s the highest degree of outrage County Administrator Ward can muster? He’s not pleased?

Who said this Naled pesticide was safe? None other than the CDC. Sort of.

On the agency’s web page titled “Zika Virus: Information on aerial spraying,” we have several remarkable and inconsistent statements, obviously designed to straddle the fence and cover the agency and pesticide companies:

“Spraying Naled can kill bees outside of their hives at the time of spraying; therefore, spraying is limited to dawn or dusk when bees are inside their hives…”

“Because Naled breaks down quickly, it does not pose a risk to the honey bee populations…”

“Studies show that honey production between hives in treated and untreated sites did not show significantly different quantities of honey over the course of a season…” [But suppose millions of bees are killed and their colonies are destroyed?]

“For additional protection, urban bee keepers inside the spray zone can cover their hives when spraying occurs…”

A masterpiece of slippery contradiction. Naled is safe, but it isn’t, but it is.

Regardless, Dorchester County, in South Carolina, just learned a lesson about pesticide safety.

And for what? To kill mosquitoes purportedly carrying the Zika virus.

This is the virus that hasn’t been proved to cause anything. Zika. I have covered this hoax extensively in past articles. In a nutshell, no researchers anywhere in the world have been able to demonstrate a strong correlation between the presence of Zika and cases of the birth defect called microcephaly. The correlation isn’t there.

This failure is actually a refutation of the notion that Zika causes microcephaly. It’s a mandatory reason for saying, “Well, that Zika idea doesn’t work, now we have to go back to the drawing board to find out what’s causing this birth defect.”

But that’s not what the CDC and the World Health Organization are doing. They’re promoting Zika day and night; and the payoff will be a Zika vaccine.

These are the global health agencies tasked with guarding your health.

If you want to dig further, you can discover that, despite assurances to the contrary, Naled, like other toxic organophosphate pesticides, harms humans as well. Organophosphates are neurotoxins.

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com
________________________________________________________________
Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

WARNING: Experts Say Genetically Modified Mosquitoes Could Transmit Modified DNA To Humans

Zika

Source: NaturalNews.com
J.D. Heyes
August 10, 2016

Genetically modified mosquitoes that have been released in Brazil, and may soon be released in Florida to combat the Zika virus, have the potential to directly inject modified DNA into any humans they bite.

The lab-bred GM Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, according to Oxitec – the biotech company that breeds them – are genetically programed to mate with wild females and transfer a gene that is fatal to any offspring.

But critics of the technique say too little is known about the potential for long-term environmental damage, as well as how humans will react to the injection of the gene if they are bitten by a GM Aedes aegypti mosquito.

The Zika virus is not new. As reported by Collective Evolution, it has been around since at least 1947. What’s more, the virus is marketed by two companies, and the Rockefeller Foundation owns the patent on the virus.

There is also the fact that the virus – which is generally weak, causing mostly mild symptoms that disappear in a few days – may not be the cause behind a rash of babies born with microcephaly in Brazil, where the current outbreak began. There could be other environmental factors working in conjunction with the Zika virus, or something else altogether.

Microcephaly limited to just one region of Brazil; Zika might not be sole cause

“We can see there is a kind of cluster in [part of] the northeast region with high prevalence and high severity, of miscarriage and congenital malformation that is really severe,” Fatima Marinho, coordinator of epidemiological analysis and information at Brazil’s Ministry of Health told The Globe and Mail.

“But we didn’t find this in other states – even the [adjacent] states didn’t see the same situation as in the epicenter. … We were preparing for an explosion and it didn’t come,” Marinho added.

“So we started to think that in this central area maybe more than Zika is causing this intensity and severity. This is an area that was under attack by viruses: Some parts even had measles,” during the time the bulk of the microcephaly cases arose, Marinho said.

Brazilian researchers won’t know the answer for months, but in the meantime, additional DNA-changing mosquitoes are due to be set loose in Florida, where some homegrown Zika cases have turned up. But thus far there have been no U.S. cases of Zika-linked microcephaly.

As reported by CBS News, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has “confirmed” that Zika virus causes some babies to be born with abnormally small heads, but the Brazilian Health Ministry says that researchers are not entirely certain that is correct. Also, scientists do know that other viruses and environmental toxins can cause the condition.

‘Zika hysteria dominating the scientifically illiterate media’

In recent days, Natural News founder and editor Mike Adams, the Health Ranger and author of the new book, Food Forensics, reported that the lack of microcephaly cases in other places where the Zika virus has been prevalent proves that the “doomsday” scenario being painted by the CDC and others is evidence of a “massive hoax.”

And many are concerned about the transfer to humans of the genetic code carried by GM mosquitoes: What effect will the gene have on the ecosystems in which humans dwell?

That’s because the tactic of introducing the GM mosquitoes into the environment to kill Zika-carrying breeds is not 100 percent foolproof. Some of Oxitec’s own research notes that the antibiotic tetracycline, which is very pervasive in Brazil’s livestock sector, could render as many as 15 percent of the GM mosquitoes ineffective. But the natural order of things is still affected by the passing along of DNA.

“Zika hysteria dominated the scientifically illiterate media, in much the same way that the climate change hoax also grabs headlines,” writes Adams. “In both cases, you have the combination of false fear and bad science, amplified by a scientifically illiterate (but politically compliant) mainstream media, and believed by a gullible population of cowardly consumers who fall for every quack science hoax perpetrated on them by dishonest government.”

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources for this story include:

TheGlobeAndMail.com

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

CBSNews.com

Zika Virus Now A Mental Epidemic Of Pandemic Proportions Thanks To Mass Media Hysteria

Zika hoax
Source: NaturalNews.com
S.D. Wells
August 8, 2016

Zika virus does not cause birth defects in human babies. This hoax is now officially debunked. Zika virus was discovered about 70 years ago, and since then, no deformations of human babies have ever been associated with it.

Think of zika as the new swine flu, where the CDC is pushing propaganda to scare everyone into an upcoming mass vaccination program that brings in millions of dollars for the biotech, pharma and vaccine industries, including Monsanto, Bayer and most likely Merck. Remember last year when the CDC admitted that the flu shot contained the wrong strains, but told everyone to “get in anyway,” just in case? They sold over 200 million shots, filled with mercury, MSG, aluminum and formaldehyde. Here are the facts about zika on a timeline for your educational convenience:

1947: Zika virus is discovered in the Zika forest in Uganda, Africa. An arbovirus of the genus Flavivirus, zika is similar to dengue and yellow fever, and the first human cases are described. Identified outbreaks in Southeast Asia and Oceania follow, and cases in Africa are documented by the early 1960s.

2007: Yap epidemic (an island in Pacific Ocean) documents first large scale epidemic, where three quarters of the local population are infected with zika, but zero birth defects are reported.

Genetically modified version of the zika virus is developed by a British biotech company called Oxitec (Oxford Insect Technologies), with funds from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

October, 2009: Beginning of the first outdoor trials of GM transgenic Aedes aegypti mosquitoes on the Caribbean island of Grand Cayman. Genetically engineered mosquitoes allegedly fight the spread of dengue fever, yellow fever, chikungunya and zika virus.

June, 2014: Sumitomo Chemical Company, associated with Monsanto, manufactures and releases pyroproxyfen chemical larvicide and weed killer for distribution in Latin America, because Roundup is no longer killing the weeds. Pyroproxyfen produces malformations in mosquitoes.

August, 2014: WHO (World Health Organization) recommends spreading deadly poison pyroproxyfen on state drinking water in Brazil to combat mosquito problem, because mosquitoes are breeding in standing water supplies.

Massive spreading of pyroproxyfen using planes over poverty-stricken areas ensues.

May, 2015: WHO and the Ministry of Health estimate more than 1 million “suspected” cases of zika “virus disease” occurring in Brazil.

By the end of 2015: Up to 4,000 children in Pernambuco are born with congenital malformations, including microcephaly (small heads).

February, 2016: Physicians in Brazil report benign disease dengue-zika is spreading among the population, and is being transmitted by the Aedes mosquito.

March, 2016: Brazilian Ministry of Health jumps to make the assertion that the rise in microcephaly cases in newborns is directly linked to the zika virus.

Research reveals (but is buried by mass media) that previous zika epidemics did not cause birth defects in newborns, even though affecting certain countries – like Columbia – at a rate of 75 percent of the population. In fact, there are zero records of microcephaly on record.

Brazilian doctors confirm that chemical “control” is not decreasing the number of mosquitoes.

Zika virus is detected in 18 of the 26 states in Brazil.

The Gates Foundation releases GM “genetically modified” male mosquitoes to breed with females to produce malfunctioning babies that are deformed and can’t reproduce.

The D.U.M.B. Virus = Deformations (from) Unbelievable Mosquito Bites

Here is why you’re better off just getting the zika virus than risking taking an experimental vaccine: Zika “disease” is really more of a minor flu, usually accompanied by a low-grade fever, minor joint pain, headache and rash. Some people experience diarrhea, abdominal pain or constipation. Microcephaly was never associated with zika, until the latest hoax spread across the mass media. Remember the swine flu hoax? Millions of people ran out to get the vaccine, only to find out it didn’t work, and actually caused horrific side effects.

Beware! Population control is being applied across the world, and the main form of “contraception” is delivered by toxic inoculation of teenage girls and pregnant women: from the toxic HPV vaccine, to the hoax swine flu, and soon to mass zika (DUMB) shots for all the terrified, feeble-minded sheeple. What’s next, a common cold vaccine?

These vaccinations are disguised as infectious disease immunizations, but in reality, they are nothing more than severe health detriment, income for Big Pharma and population control mechanisms, with a goal of immediate population cessation and reduction by the billions. The U.S. government infiltrates with this agenda across the globe, in countries where there are population overloads and where non-white, low income families are the majority, such as in African nations, India, Brazil and inner cities of the United States.

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources for this article include:

Reduas.com.ar

TheEventChronicle.com

NaturalNews.com

Bubblear.com

NaturalNews.com

TruthWiki.org

NaturalNews.com

Florida Preparing To Fight Zika With Controversial Insecticide Linked To Severe Health & Environmental Effects

Zika hysteria

Source: NaturalNews.com
Julie Wilson
August 5, 2016

Let’s face it, as was the case with Ebola, the media is blowing this Zika virus threat totally out of proportion, and as a result, some really bad decisions are being made along the way. As far as we’ve been told, the disease affects only a small portion of the population – pregnant women and those who may become pregnant in the near future.

The claim that Zika causes birth defects is based solely on “using epidemiological statistics, not rigorous scientific studies of cause and effect,” wrote the Health Ranger in a hit piece exposing the outbreak as an engineered pandemic to justify chemical spraying.

Scientists’ assertions are based on what they believe is a cause-and-effect relationship between the virus and developmental deformities in children born in regions of South America, home to mosquitoes carrying Zika.

But what researchers are failing to acknowledge, is that there are other, more likely causes of microcephaly, a severe birth defect resulting in reduced head size. Various types of pesticides are also known to cause birth defects.

Health officials are intent on spraying deadly chemicals into the air

Unfortunately, health officials have a one-track mind when it comes to fighting Zika – and that involves the administration of more harmful chemicals, regardless of the adverse health and environmental effects.

Reports confirm that Florida (where non-travel related cases of Zika were discovered) intends to begin aerial spraying of a densely populated urban area with a dangerous insecticide called “naled.”

The chemical assault or “campaign” as the mainstream media describes it will cover a 10-mile area including the one-mile-square area just north of downtown Miami, which experts have identified as a “hub” for Zika transmission.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in conjunction with the Florida Health Department recommended the aerial spraying to reduce adult mosquito populations capable of spreading the virus.

CDC Director Dr. Thomas Frieden said in a recent conference call that he’s concerned “that vector control efforts so far” have not been very effective – likely because the insects have grown resistant to commonly used insecticides – prompting officials to turn to the new chemical, naled.

New insecticide to be aerially sprayed can cause paralysis when inhaled

Naled is an organophosphate insecticide that when it breaks down in animals and the environment, causes “many health effects, both chronic and acute,” according to Toxipedia.org, adding that it acts as a “severe” irritant to the skin and eyes.

The chemical can affect animal and human health through ingestion and inhalation, the latter of which is believed to cause the most damage. Animal studies showed naled to be 20 times more toxic to rats when it was inhaled versus consuming the chemical in food and water.

This is highly concerning considering health officials plan to dispense the insecticide through aerial spraying, placing people at risk for inhaling the toxicant.

Pesticide drift makes this route of exposure even more likely. Researchers at the University of Florida found aerially sprayed naled may travel up to 750 meters away from the initial application site.

Animal studies show that naled exposure causes “chronic nervous system damage resulting in a mineralization of the spinal cord and decreased nervous system enzyme activity that led to partial paralysis.”

The insecticide is also harmful to aquatic life, important insects such as pollinators, and in general is “very toxic to most organisms.”

‘Environmental terrorism’

Proposals to deploy naled in other countries to combat Zika have drawn immense controversy. The Puerto Rican government met intense backlash from anti-fumigation activists when it announced plans to begin aerial spraying of the chemical.

The opposition was so strong that officials eventually agreed to suspend its use. San Juan Mayor Carmen Yulin Cruz said that spraying naled into the air is a form of “environmental terrorism.”

Doctors, farmers and activists expressed grave concerns about the chemical’s health and environmental effects, including its ability to kill honeybees, whose populations are already in sharp decline.

America’s decision to deploy such a deadly chemical to fight a disease that may or may not be causing birth defects is completely irrational and borderline insane. There’s a very good chance it could cause more birth defects, as well as other irreparable conditions.

The CDC states on its website that most people who contract Zika do not have any symptoms, and when they do, they are typically mild and include things like joint and muscle pain, headaches and fever.

“People usually don’t get sick enough to go to the hospital, and they very rarely die of Zika,” the CDC says. “Once a person has been infected with Zika, they are likely to be protected from future infections.”

Read More At: NaturalNews.com

Sources:

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

CDC.gov

TeleSurTV.net

Toxipedia.org

CA.News.Yahoo.com (Reuters)

CBSNews.com