Who Funded Hitler? — Questions For Corbett #008

Source: TheCorbettReport
James Corbett
April 3, 2017

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: http://www.corbettreport.com/?p=7721

In this edition of the ongoing Questions For Corbett podcast series, James answers your questions on weather manipulation, cyber attacks, water wars, biometrics, Hitler, online anonymity and more.

An A-Bomb for Herr Bormann (part 1 of 2) – A conversation with Carter Hydrick

Source: ForumBorealis
March 21, 2017

This mind-blow is the least known GAME CHANGER in modern history. We talk with Carter Hydrick, who was first to prove that Nazi Germany surrendered Enriched Uranium for the United States’ Manhattan Project, enabling completion of the 1st. A-Bomb dropped over Hiroshima. Why would Germany give it to their enemy? How could they, when according to mainstream history they were far behind in nuclear research? And how is it all related to the deputy Fuhrer Martin Bormann & the growing amount of evidence for his covert escape? In part 1 we explore submarine U-234’s crucial events, the nuclear race, & Bormanns rise to power…

Parts of the footage used is from ZDF documentary “Hitler’s Henchmen”, series 2, ep. 6.

:: :: :: ::

FORUM BOREALIS = in depth conversations with the most interesting and important authors, researchers, & thinkers of today, who’s work often overlaps in areas including :

Health Solutions
Structures of Consciousness
Human Relationships
Innovative Culture
Front-Line Dissidence
The Crisis of Academia
Esoteric Philosophy
Planetary Mysteries
The Antediluvian Civilization
Covert History
The Deep State
The Black Economy
The Nazi International
Fringe Science
Anti-Gravity & Zero Point Energy
The Breakaway Civilization
The Classified Space Program

Our shows are gratis & listener funded. Sponsors have first access to them at our website: http://www.forumborealis.net
Please consider supporting our work by becoming a Sponsor (even $1 helps us out): http://www.forumborealis.net/#!contri…
Subscribe to our Channel. Like and Share our Programmes. Stay Tuned. : )

:: :: :: ::

This video follows Fair-Use Rules. Its nature is non-profit and educational, for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. The character of any use, is “transformative”, that is, it adds new expression or meaning to the original (which primarily are factual works). The amount and substantiality of portions used from original work are only small bits. Such usage has in no way a harmful effect upon the potential market for, or value of, a source’s ability to profit from its original work. Our video is in no way associated with any such external artist or company. All rights of borrowed material belong to their respective owners. Cf. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976.

Nobel Science Prize Ain’t No Proof Ya Got A Brai

greenpeace-stop-gmo-invasio.ashx_-300x200
Source: Journal-Neo.org
F. William Engdahl
July 5, 2016

According to a report in the Washington Post, precisely 107 of the living Nobel Science Prize awardees have done just that. They foolishly signed a letter urging Greenpeace to stop opposing genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The letter specifically asks Greenpeace to cease its efforts to block introduction of so-called “Golden Rice,” a genetically manipulated rice variety that allegedly “could reduce” vitamin A deficiencies in infants in the developing world. This demonstrates either that those 107 Nobel laureates are not truly intelligent or that they are yet another group of scientist prostitutes willing to whore their reputation for a few shekels from Monsanto & Co. Or both…

The not-so-noble Nobel scientists’ letter states, “We urge Greenpeace and its supporters to re-examine the experience of farmers and consumers worldwide with crops and foods improved through biotechnology, recognize the findings of authoritative scientific bodies and regulatory agencies, and abandon their campaign against ‘GMOs’ in general and Golden Rice in particular.” The letter is addressed, “To the Leaders of Greenpeace, the United Nations and Governments around the world.” Their letter closes with a gut-wrenching appeal, “How many poor people in the world must die before we consider this a ‘crime against humanity‘? ” That’s heavy. It’s also bullshit.

There’s one flaw in the appeal of the 107 Nobel Science laureates. Their letter is scientific nonsense from beginning to end. Everything they write about GMO has scientifically and repeatedly been proved false. Let’s focus on their main argument about GMO beta-carotene “Golden Rice.”

Golden Rice failed

Some brief history is needed to grasp how idiotic are their claims about Golden Rice that it will mitigate Vitamin A Deficiency in poor countries of Asia and Africa, and save millions of childrens’ lives thereby.

The world of GMO is a creation of the Rockefeller Foundation. In 1985, the Rockefeller Foundation initiated the first large-scale research into the possibility of genetically engineering plants for commercial use. At the time they termed it a “major, long-term commitment to plant genetic engineering.” Rockefeller Foundation funds provided the essential catalyst for the worldwide scientific research and development which would lead to the creation of genetically modified plants, the “Gene Revolution.”

Over the following two decades, the Rockefellers’ tax-exempt foundation would spend well over $100 million directly, and several hundred million indirectly, to catalyze and propagate research on the development of genetic engineering and its application to transform world food production. Clearly, it was a very big issue in their strategic plans. Notably, the same Rockefeller Foundation funded Hitler’s eugenics research during much of the Third Reich until outbreak of the war in 1939 when it became embarrassing. After Nuremburg trials at the end of the war, an intimate Rockefeller associate and then-president of the American Eugenics Society, Frederick Osborn, announced, “Henceforth the new name of eugenics is genetics.”

Simply said, this eugenics–culling of the human breed as Prince Philip once so elegantly and chillingly put it–not feeding the world, is the true agenda of genetic manipulation. I refer skeptics or the curious to my book, Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, (Saat der Zerstörung) for detailed sourced discussion of this entire grotesque “scientific” operation of the Rockefeller Foundation.

Continue Reading At: Journal-Neo.org
________________________________________________________________
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”

Review [Recommended Book] – Rise Of The Fourth Reich By Jim Marrs

4thR.jpg
TheBreakaway
Zy Marquiez
January 22, 2016

“Since the war was lost, the “enemy lines” meant, quite literally, a new kind of special guerilla warfare was to be waged from a postwar Nazi underground, quite literally, “behind enemy lines” which would in the aftermath of the war, cover the entire globe, and that warfare was deliberately conceived in conjunction with an advanced technology that, in the hands of Weltanschauungskrieg experts, would be used to spread fear, terror, confusion, and thereby to demoralize the enemy, short circuit his world-interpretation and decision making process….But what precisely, was that technology?”
– Joseph P. Farrel, Saucers, Swastikas And PsyOps – A History Of A Breakaway Civilization: Hidden Aerospace Technologies And Psychological Operations

“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”

“The hierarchical organization and the initiation through symbolic rites, that is to say, without bothering the brain but by working on the imagination through magic and the symbols of a cult, all this is the dangerous element, and the element I have taken over.”

– Adolf Hitler

In this tour de force, The Rise Of The Fourth Reich – The Secret Societies That Threaten To Take Over America, Jim Marrs does unparalleled work in exposing an extensive amount of data regarding the Nazis that you will not get taught in school.

As its often said, history is written by the winners.  That would certainly help explain why so little is known of what the Nazis were up too Post-WWII. The official narrative would have one believe that during WWII the Nazis were defeated, and that was the end of it.  The reality of the matter is not so simple.  In this book, Marrs seeks to shed light on these unknown circumstances.

Be that as it may, one quick, yet notable example of how history is twisted, is the fact that much of the populace is blind to the fact that America, the Vatican, as well as other countries funneled Nazis through ratlines in droves. If that were it the extent of it, it would be bad enough. However, many of those very high-ranking criminal Nazis were given positions of power within the establishment of the time via Project Paperclip; most notable of those is Dr. Wehrner Von Braun, who in later years became the head of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [NASA]. Other high ranking Nazis brought over in such a manner include Kurt Diebner, Otto Hahn often called “the father of nuclear chemistry”, Walter Gerlach, and many others.

Therein, by 1955, nearly a thousand German scientists had been funneled into the United States and given vital positions within the American Scientific community.  This event spawned the seeds that allowed “The Fourth Reich” to firmly entrench itself within the American military and intelligence infrastructure.

In conjunction with explaining how the above manifested, Marrs also covered at length the strangeness of Rudolf Hess and his particular case, while also examining the mystery behind what is oft-termed ‘Nazi Wonder Weapons’.  In this part, Marrs – like a heat seeking missile – locks into the most keen components of this untold story with a rather salient synopsis.

Another noteworthy point that affects our everyday lives – yet has its nascent stages within the Nazi history – is the one of the neurotoxin Fluoride.   Unbeknownst too many is the fact that not only is this toxin put into much of the water supply, but it also causes extensive detrimental side effects such as lower IQ [as Harvard studies find], mental retardation, brain damage, skeletal fluorosis, increased bone fractures, genetic damage, dental fluorosis, gastrointestinal disturbances.  Additionally, Marrs also covers the noxious Aspartame, which the FDA knows has 92 potential side effects, but still pushed it through since it was Donald Rumsfeld’s Bioweapon Legacy.

Some of the other topics touched upon by Marrs include the Nazi Mind Control programs [that aided in the spawning of the infamous MK-Ultra Mind Control program], as well as the elite & corporate ties to the Nazis, the Nazi connections to the pharmaceutical industry, I.G. Farben and their love for eugenics, the pervasive control of mainstream media, and a whole lot more.

Calling this merely a great book would be an understatement. This phenomenal foray into Nazi lore is a veritable library of references for the inquiring individual.  The research undertaken by Marrs is as well rounded as it is incisive. Not knowing the information in this book would be a great disservice to those individuals wishing to understand how much of the corruption that takes place in modern times has nefarious roots directly connected to that Post-WWII, which serves to explain in part the modern rise of fascism as we can currently see that keeps growing unabated.

————————————————————————————————————————

Other suggested books on the topic:

The Third Way – The Nazi International, European Union, And Corporate Fascism by Joseph P. Farrel
Nazi International – The Nazis’ Postwar Plan To Control Finance, Conflict, Physics and Space by Joseph P. Farrell
Saucers, Swastikas And PsyOps – A History Of A Breakaway Civilization: Hidden Aerospace Technologies And Psychological Operations, by Joseph P. Farrell
Ratline – Soviet Spies, Nazi Priests, and the Disappearance of Adolf Hitler by Peter Levenda
Unholy Alliance – A History Of Nazi Involvement In The Occult, by Peter Levenda
The Hitler Legacy – The Nazi Cult In Diaspora by Peter Levenda

Rethinking Water Fluoridation – Over 25 Disturbing Quotes About The Neurotoxin Fluoride

wf

TheBreakaway
Zy Marquiez
January 19, 2016

Below is some information provided by various sources, concerning the dangers of Fluoride. This should be taken in conjunction with the previous post:

The Breakaway Guide To Fluoride

The above link, and what follows will give ample evidence as to the dangers of fluoride, and why they should be avoided.

The disturbing quotes, which were found in the NoFluoride.com website, follow:

“It is now clear that fluoride is a potentially harmful substance when present in the drinking water in any amount.”
– Dr. Simon Beisler, Chief of Urlogy, Roosevelt Hospital and Past President of the American Urological Association.

“The American Medical Association is NOT prepared to state that no harm will be done to any person by water fluoridation. The AMA has not carried out any research work, either long-term or short-term, regarding the possibility of any side effects.”
– Dr. Flanagan, Assistant Director of Environmental Health, American Medical Association.

“Based on data from the National Academy of Sciences, current levels of fluoride exposure in drinking water may cause arthritis in a substantial portion of the population long before they reach old age”
-Dr. Robert Carton, former EPA Scientist.

“Fluorides are general protoplasmic poisons, probably because of their capacity to modify the metabolism of cells by changing the permeability of the cell membrane and by inhibiting certain enzyme systems.”
Journal of the American Medical Association, Sept 18, 1943

Segments of the population are unusually susceptible to the toxic effects of fluoride. They include “postmenopausal women and elderly men, pregnant woman and their fetuses, people with deficiencies of calcium, magnesium and/or vitamin C, and people with cardiovascular and kidney problems.”
United States Public Health Service Report (ATSDR TP-91/17, pg. 112, Sec.2.7, April 1993)

“fluoride exposure, at levels that are experienced by a significant proportion of the population whose drinking water is fluoridated, may have adverse impacts on the developing brain.”
– Greater Boston Physicians for Social Responsibility, May 2000

“It is now clear that fluoride is a potentially harmful substance when present in the drinking water in any amount.”
– Dr. Simon Beisler, Chief of Urlogy, Roosevelt Hospital and Past President of the American Urological Association.

“The plain fact that fluorine is an insidious poison harmful, toxic and cumulative in its effects, even when ingested in minimal amounts, will remain unchanged no matter how many times it will be repeated in print that fluoridation of the water supply is ‘safe.'”
– Dr. Ludgwig Grosse, Chief of Cancer Research, U.S. Veterans Administration.

In Harlem, NY, which has been fluoridated for 32 years, “There’s more dental decay among these kids; we see the beginning of inflamed gingivitis in their mouths.”
American Dental Association, May 2000

“The CDA emphasizes that the need for fluoride depends on overall exposure, including place of residence, diet and oral health habits. and “The CDA recognizes the need to continue to monitor studies on fluoride and general health.”
Canadian Dental Association, May, 2000

“Fluoride has been shown to adversely effect the central nervous system, causing behavioral changes, increased hip fractures and reproduction problems.”
Natick Report Research Team [Research Microbiologist, U.S. Army, Dr. B. J. Gallo, Environmental Chemist, J. Kupperschmidt Apollo Program Project Scientist, Dr. N.R. Mancuso, U.S. Army Natick Research Labs, A. Murray, Molecular Biologist, Dr. Strauss]

“I am appalled at the prospect of using water as a vehicle for drugs. Fluoride is a corrosive poison that will produce serious effects on a long range basis. Any attempt to use water this way is deplorable.”
– Dr. Charles Gordon Heyd, Past President of the American Medical Association.

“…fluoridation … it is the greatest fraud that has ever been perpetrated and it has been perpetrated on more people than any other fraud has.”
– Dr. Professor Albert Schatz, (Microbiology), co-discoverer of Streptomycin, the cure for tuberculosis and numerous other bacterial infections.

Fluoride may be destroying our bones, our teeth and overall health.. it doesn’t need to be added to our water and we may be taking unnecessary risks by doing so. ”
– Dr. Hardy Limeback, a leading Canadian fluoride authority, former fluoride advocate and long-standing consultant to Canadian Dental Association.

“The evidence against the safety of this public health policy keeps mounting; it is too compelling to ignore.”
– Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, Children’s Hospital, Boston

“By 1983 I was thoroughly convinced that fluoridation caused more harm than good. I expressed the opinion that some of these children with dental fluorosis could, just possibly, have also suffered harm to their bones”
– Dr. Colquhoun, former Principal Dental Officer for Auckland New Zealand.

“.. the evidence is quite convincing that the addition of sodium fluoride to the public water supply at one part per million is extremely deleterious to the human body”.
– Chief Justice John Flaherty, of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (presided over litigation involving fluoridation)

“This record is barren of any credible and reputable scientific epidemiological studies and/or analysis of statistical data which would support the Illinois Legislatures determination that fluoridation of the water supplies is both a safe and effective means of promoting public health.”
– Illinois Judge Ronald Niemann (presided over litigation involving fluoridation)

“the artificial fluoridation of public water supplies, such as contemplated by (Houston) City ordinance No. 80-2530 may cause or may contribute to the cause of cancer, genetic damage, intolerant reactions, and chronic toxicity, including dental mottling, in man; that the said artificial fluoridation may aggravate malnutrition and existing illnesses in man; and that the value of said artificial fluoridation is in doubt as to the reduction of tooth decay in man.”
– Texas Judge Anthony Farris (presided over litigation involving fluoridation)

“E.P.A. should act immediately to protect the public, not just on the cancer data, but on the evidence of bone fractures, arthritis, mutagenicity and other effects.”
– Dr. William Marcus, Senior Toxicologist at E.P.A.

In 1996, there were approximately 340,000 hospital admissions for hip fractures in the United States. Women sustain 75 percent-80 percent of all hip fractures. Medicare costs for hip fractures were estimated at $2.9 billion in 1991. Centers for Disease Control

“About one-half of the people with hip fractures end up in nursing homes, and in the year following the fracture, 20 per cent of them die.”
– Harold Slavkin, Director of National Institute of Dental Research (JADA 1999)

“..fluoride damages bone even at levels added to public drinking water” American Journal of Epidemiology, October 1999

“Since 1990, five major epidemiological studies from three countries-the United States, United Kingdom and France– showing a higher rate of hip fractures in fluoridated regions..”
– Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health
, 1997 vol. 21 no. 24

“..significant increase in the risk of hip fracture in both men and women exposed to artificial fluoridation at 1 ppm.”
– Journal of the American Medical Association
, August 1992

“..the recommended “optimal” intake (a level that has yet to be determined scientifically).”
– Journal of the American Dental Association
, Dec. 1995

“Water contains a number of substances that are undesirable, and fluorides are just one of them” stated Dr. F. A. Bull, State Dental Director of Wisconsin, speaking at the Fourth Annual Conference of State Dental Directors.

Hundreds of millions of dollars may be wasted annually on children’s fluoride treatments by dentists. Typically given once or twice a year at routine checkups, the treatments do nothing to reduce cavities in kids, says a study of insurance records. Journal of Public Health Dentistry

In June of 1999, the Majority Chairman of the Environmental Resources Committee, Pennsylvania House of Representatives stated “.. there is no solid scientific or medical evidence to show that fluoridation is of any beneficial help to public health, safety or welfare.”

The former editor of the Journal of the American Medical Association said he often received telephone calls from irate AMA members and letters from state medical societies and AMA officers “threatening political action against the editor and the Journal for publishing what offended them ideologically, or more likely imposed on (physicians’) ability to earn money.”
– Mr. Lundberg, editor of JAMA for 17 years

 “That the artificial fluoridation of public water supplies, such as is contemplated by [Houston] City Ordinance No. 80-2530, may cause or may contribute to the cause of cancer, genetic damage, intolerant reactions, and chronic toxicity, including dental mottling, in man; that the said artificial fluoridation may aggravate malnutrition and existing illnesses in man; and that the value of said artificial fluoridation is in doubt as to the reduction of tooth decay in man.”
– Judge Farris, presiding judge in a case involving the fluoridation of Houston’s water.

The Washington Bureau editor of AD Impact, the monthly publication of the Academy of General Dentistry, wrote last year that supporters of fluoridation have had an “unwillingness to release any information that would cast fluorides in a negative light,” and that organized dentistry has lost “its objectivity – the ability to consider varying viewpoints together with scientific data to reach a sensible conclusion.”

“All of the organizations promoting water fluoridation agree that dental fluorosis, which is the first visible sign of systemic poisoning, increases with water fluoride levels.”
Dr. Kennedy, Past President of International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology and a practicing Dentist for 20 years.

Knowing all the above, is it any surprise that water fluoridation failed modern civilization [as if it could really succeed], but it’s been rejected by place after place after place.

However, over the last few years, there has been quite the progress in the elimination of fluoride from the water supplies by the Fluoride Action Network [FAN]. This has been quite a lengthy battle, but it’s far from over.

Let’s not forget that many communities still face a veritable onslaught of toxins via the water ways. Some of these include chlorine, pharmaceutical drugs, hexavalent chromium, lead, aluminum, heavy metals, and much more.

This is why it’s imperative for individuals to take back their health.

Water being such an integral component, its something that shouldn’t be overlooked by the population.

If you want more information about why tap water is dangerous, read the following two articles:

Why Filtering Your Water Is A Necessity

Game-Changing Water Purifier Displaces Bottle Water Industry’s Dominance

————————————————————————————————-
Sources & References :

https://thebreakaway.wordpress.com/2015/12/05/the-breakaway-guide-to-fluoride/
https://www.nofluoride.com
http://www.naturalnews.com/038949_water_fluoridation_failure_toxic_chemicals.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/040465_water_fluoridation_Portland_ballot_measure.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/035352_safe_water_fluoridation_Indiana.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/033496_Philadelphia_water_fluoridation.html
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/game-changing-water-purifier-displaces-bottle-water-industrys-dominance
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/01/13/filtering-household-water.aspx