Book Review: Covert Wars And Breakaway Civilizations – The Secret Space Program, Celestial Psyops & Hidden Conflicts by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell

Zy Marquiez
February 12, 2016

Of the many great books Dr. Joseph P. Farrell has published, this one is one of my favorites.

Constantly, for many years now he has been putting out high quality information, and this book is no different.

Covert Wars And Breakaway Civilizations – The Secret Space Program, Celestial Psyops & Hidden Conflicts by Dr. Joseph P. Farrell, is a mind bending expedition not only into the abstruse facets/subjects that have helped mold our society, but also showcasing how these components are being used to carve out a different reality – a more sinister one. And parallel to that is arguably one collective powerful group [at minimum] that’s breaking away.

‘Breaking Away’, is an off-shoot of the term ‘Breakaway Civilization’, which was coined by scholar and renown researcher Richard Dolan.  Dolan has written an extensive and rather thought-provoking synopsis of what a Breakaway Civilization is in his analysis titled A Breakaway Civilization: What It Is, & What It Means For Us

Getting back on track, opening the journey into this book, Farrell lays the foundation by covering the financial nexus that has fueled much of the malice that we have seen within the financial sector, and which has naturally dovetailed into other arenas as well.

Economic warfare is a topic that doesn’t get enough light by mainstream, and even alternative media circles to some extent. However, the modern derivative [no pun intended] of financial warfare has some of its nascent stages within the earlier parts of the 20th Century. A prime example of this is Operation Bernhard. This type of operation was the brainchild of the Nazi’s during WWII, and its main purpose was to “destabilise the British economy via economic warfare by flooding the global and British Empire with Forged Bank of England” notes.[1]

This sophisticated method of economic warfare of using British pound notes was phenomenally trenchant not only because it took part in an industrial scale, as Farrell mentions, but also because as is mentioned by the author, “They were, in effect, to be British pound notes”. That’s the type of forgeries that were being carried out by the Nazis.[2] Why is this important? Because, as alluded to earlier, this helped lay the financial foundation for what would become the Nazi War Machine

Moving on, coupled with the financial component that is Operation Bernhard, Farrell moves forward to a more modern operation that involves the recent Bearer Bond Scandal, as well as how the Vatican dovetails into that as well. The so called “Kennedy Bonds” are touched upon lightly as well. Farrell does a rather thorough analysis of these Bonds within his book, and with a fine-tooth comb picks apart some minute [i.e. monumental] details that are not so subtle in regards to space.

All of these abstruse yet notable avenues lead towards what Farrell has repeatedly named, a hidden system Of Finance. This particular system is what was created in the mid 20th century, and has been arguably used to fund a large majority of the more nefarious technological programs that take place behind the scenes as it were.

In a way, all of these topics [and more] segue into bulk data in many different ways. This of course merges with the topic of bulk data collection. And on this topic, Farrell postulates that the PROMIS system, which is related to the Inslaw affair, is a profound technology used to carry this type of bulk spying. Why is this important? Because as Farrell alludes in his book:

“According to Seymour, Inslaw founder Bill Hamilton had come to his own research conclusions. He believed “…after more than two decades of research, that the modified version of his PROMIS software had been used for money laundering of drug profits to fund unauthorized intelligence operations…” Indeed, such a powerful program would not only allow the tracking of covert financial activities, and even for the existence of an entire covert financial system, but it would also allow something equally important for such a system to exist, namely, the ability to cover its tracks and obfuscate its activities by using the “backdoor” to modify the actual numbers of transactions…say, for example, the amounts of gold actually in existence. Such a tool would allow the same amount of gold to be used as the backing or collateral to float securities over and over different issues.” [3]

As if that’s not enough, the PROMIS system has darker components, but for that, you will have to read Farrell’s book.

The gold alluded to the passage cited above, is the main component in Operation Golden Lily. Farrell tackles how Operation Golden Lily, as well as the Bearer Bonds, were used in the establishment of the hidden system of finance spoken about already. As the author has mentioned countless times, the amount of Gold in circulation, by any and all precise forms of analysis, is not capable of being narrowed down and honed in on. There is no unquestionable verifiable source that one can cite as conclusive in respect to the amount of Gold in circulation in the system. Different researchers will give readers different estimates of these amounts, and as Farrell has alluded to if am not mistake, this is done on purpose, to obfuscate the real amount of Gold in circulation. This is because, as Farrell estimates, the amount of Gold in circulation might be off by an order of magnitude. A preposterous hypothesis to some perhaps, but, when taken in conjunction with all the data provided by Farrell, as well as the monumental work of Sterling and Peggy Seagrave in Gold Warriors, and other researchers as well, one begins to see a larger picture that has been clearly veiled over for very nefarious reasons.   Some of these reasons are honed in on by Farrell in this book and in his interviews regarding this subject.

Other subjects that dovetail disturbingly quite well into this book is 9/11 targets, the Bushes, and many other parts of this orchestrated event . The components of 9/11 that Farrell harpoons on are oft-overlooked sections by most 9/11 researchers, but ones that have rather resounding effects into what is still taking place to this day.

Farrell’s theory as to why the covert operation that was 9/11 was undertaken is spoken about, and it’s something that no other researcher out there has even touched, nor come close too in my estimation. The author’s hypothesis, when all the data presented is taken into consideration, is arguably incredibly strong.  This can be noted by the capabilities of the orchestrators of the attack, as well as what they stood to lose by a possible exposure of their hidden financial capacities if such attack did not take place.

One particular subject that has far reaching implications is the weaponization of planet earth. Regarding this, Farrell covers not only the technologies of Geophysical Warfare, but also how this couples rather disturbingly with Kardashev’s Class Of Civilizations theory.  Regarding Geophysical Warfare, Farrell looks through various lenses, and even hones in on an Air Force study called Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning The Weather In 2025.

Such power gives those in control, as writer of Weather Farfare: The Military’s Plan To Draft Mother Nature, Jerry Smith states, the ability to undertake “war covertly by causing droughts, storms, volcanic eruptions and floods” and thus raising the question “how would the general public know if such war were being fought?”[4]

Farrell even takes a gander at some of Charles L. Chandler’s work in respect to the Electromagnetic Nature of Tornadoes. This component was definitely unexpected but very fascinating.

Given the highly advanced technological dissertation in the book, of course, no work would be complete without at least taking a gander at Nikola Tesla’s work. Here, Farrell follows how Tesla’s work dovetailed with geophysical weapons, and then some. From there, not only does the author carry out some detailed analysis in a few directions, but he also gives some of the powerful implications that are set forth from there.   This chapter alone will blow a hole in most people’s conventional views of Earthquakes, and many other ‘natural’ phenomena.

Dozens of pages, if not more, could be written about Farrell’s coverage, and the disturbing implications of all that he covers. That still wouldn’t be enough, because there are so many components that merge into what’s been called “Full Spectrum Dominance” that it boggles the mind of those which know not of what’s taking place.

Farrell also buttresses his book with a thorough view into the “Airship Mystery” of the 19th and early 20th century. This is quite notable, for within these observations one can see how the nascent stages – the schematics – of a Breakaway Civilization were developed.

Another oft-overlooked, but quite important issue that is covered is that of UFOs and Nuclear Weapons. Countless events have taken place in which UFOs have shown their capability to activate nuclear missiles. Yes, you read that right. This has been covered by many researches, most notably Robert Hastings covers it incisively in his books UFOs And Nukes: Extraordinary Encounters At Nuclear Weapon Sites. Farrell covers this aspect, as having the most powerful weapons [within the public realm] be able to be toyed with, by others – whomever they may be – shows capacity that’s oft-covered up by the mainstream.

Given the powers that those piloting the UFOs were showcasing, as Farrell notes, “The technological capability of the UFO presented a direct challenge to the aura of “full spectrum dominance’ being evolved by the elite during the postwar period, and hence, the UFO presence could not be openly acknowledged, at least, that is, until some technological parity had been achieved.”[5]

In all honesty, all of what Farrell covers is very intriguing, but not without its darker implications. If any of what has been mentioned fascinates you, get this book. You will not regret it.

Most people think we live in a word where the impossible can’t take place; where reality is by most measures boring. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Not only does this book show how much of what people would call Science Fiction does take place, but lays the foundation to view modern, and future warfare in a different light.

Gone are the days in which the use of a sword as a weapon, would prompt the enemy to create a shield, which would prompt the counter enemy to create a cannon, and so on. Linear warfare for all intents and purposes its losing its effectiveness, except for in theater.

Humanity has walked through a dangerous door, in which warfare is not only waged via economic means, but also via propaganda, social engineering, entrainment technology, weaponized foods, GeoEngineering and so on. Coupled with that are non-linear weapons being used, in which one country creates a storm, while the other can reply with a hurricane, and the next can use an Earthquake, and even possibly Tsunamis as well. That’s just the tip of the iceberg.   And the thing is, most of the populace is blind to it because they think its always “Mother Nature” pulling the strings. Only if it were that simple.

If you’re still skeptical, why not take a gander at, as was mentioned earlier, the Air Force study called Weather As A Force Multiplier: Owning The Weather In 2025. That alone will blow most people’s mind into what the Airforce was planning to accomplish. That’s in the public record as well.

If you’re looking for more info, as well, make sure to take a gander at Farrell’s other two books in this series:

Saucers, Swastikas and Psyops: A History Of A Breakaway Civilization: Hidden Aerospace Technologies And Psychological Operations

Covert Wars and the Clash Of Civilizations: UFOs, Oligarchs an Space Secrecy.

This entire trilogy will allow you to view the world in a whole new lense, and realize that history is not what we’re being taught. History is about what lies in the shadows. And we can only see that, if light is cast upon it. This book sheds plenty of light in those direction where darkness has seeped into.

There are countless other topics that are covered, and for that, you’ll have to read this book.

Source & References:

[2] Joseph P. Farrell, Covert Wars And Breakaway Civilizations – The Secret Space Program, Celestial Psyops & Hidden Conflicts, p. 10.
[3] Ibid., p. 124.
[4] Ibid., p. 223
[5] Ibid., p. 358

Additional Link:

Click to access vol3ch15.pdf

If America Were A Car, It would Be In The Shop

Jon Rappoport
February 11, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

And if it were in the shop, the mechanics would remove the defective transmission labeled Globalism and install a new one.

The free market, such as it was 60 years ago, was a kind of balancing act, imperfect, but functioning. US manufacturing plants and domestic workers were producing products and selling them at what would now be considered high prices. Compared to what? Compared to prices if the factories had been located overseas, where workers were paid far less, where safety and environmental laws were lax.

But those American workers in factories were making a living wage. They could afford to buy products made in America. Not all workers could, but a lot of them could.

In that “closed system,” the balancing act was: US wages vs. the price of goods produced in America. Could a worker make enough to buy enough of what he wanted? The answer, of course, wasn’t an unqualified yes, but it was a significant yes.

However, Rockefeller Globalists were looking for something else, and they began their earnest effort at transformation in 1945, when the first round of GATT talks took place. Fifty years later, that international treaty was signed and wrapped up, and the World Trade Organization was created.

Suddenly, tariffs were off the table. Foreign companies could export their goods to America, pay no tariff, and sell them cheaply. US companies could shut down domestic factories, go abroad, open up factories there, make goods cheaply, and export them to the US. The whole game changed.

The Globalists’ propaganda, spouted by men like the unctuous Bill Clinton, claimed that, on balance, this would be a good deal for American workers. They could buy what they wanted at lower prices.

Of course, many of those US workers were now out of jobs, because the companies they worked for here had shut down and moved to faraway places. The former balancing act between wages and buying power was destroyed.

And as more US companies moved out of the country, more US workers were unemployed. The old US “closed system” was no more. Everything was “global” now.

That old closed system had worked because, in America, if workers hadn’t been paid a decent wage, they wouldn’t have been able to buy products “made in America,” and the whole system would have collapsed.

But understand this: top-tier Globalists wanted to wreck the American economy. In the wake of the ongoing destruction, they wanted to shift as many economic control mechanisms as possible to the federal government. And they wanted to bulk up mega-corporations, which would operate internationally, with no allegiance to any government or nation.

Globalists were re-shaping the mission of government and corporations, so those twins’ true loyalties were pledged to the agenda of One Planet, under one overarching management system.

The Globalists are on their way.

There is just one problem. As they put a knife into the heart of one vibrant national economy after another (through expanding unemployment), the number of consumers who are able to participate in the new system declines, drops, dries up.

Continue Reading At:

Since When Is Limiting Immigration A Crime

And Since When Is Bombing & Invading Other Countries A Virtuous Act

Jon Rappoport
January 25, 2016

Double trouble.

Somehow, putting a lid on immigration is now a crime against humanity. That’s quite a propaganda triumph. So let’s announce, with a great flourish, that the US and Europe will welcome everybody else on the planet. Let’s go all the way to prove our tolerance and good will. Why not? The wonderful people who support waves of immigration don’t seem to be able to put a top number on this whole operation. They have a bone stuck in their throats. They can’t say, “Well, here is the absolute highest number of immigrants who can come in.” They just can’t. To do so would taint the quality of their heroic empathy. It would rip a hole in their Sails of Love.

“Mr. President, perhaps you could tell us how many immigrants we can admit to our shores. When would it start being a, you know, problem? We just want to get an idea of the scope of this whole thing. When do the numbers begin to exert a strain on the economy, for example? Aside from, ahem, now. At what point do you suppose the number of criminals among the immigrants will cause, what shall I call it, serious trouble? When will the resettling of these millions of people into communities start to crack and disrupt and destroy the coherence of those communities? I mean, there must be a number beyond which it’s unwise to go. Isn’t that the way the world generally works? Too much of anything becomes dangerous. Too many militarized policemen, too much surveillance, too much CIA interference in other countries, too many corporate lobbyists, too many US-backed ISIS fighters, too many leaking cylinders of nuclear waste, too much pressure on a power plant during an earthquake. So how about a top-limit immigration number? Does a person who just asks for such a figure automatically qualify as a satanic messenger from Hell? Just trying to get a feel for the landscape of this issue…if there is a landscape.”

No-top-number is called a clue. The people who should be giving one but aren’t are either deranged love addicts or conscious agents of destruction.

Another clue: claiming, with a straight face, that granting all sorts of government benefits to immigrants as soon as they cross the border is in no way an inducement for them to show up.

As I’ve explained in previous articles, the whole “wave of migration” is an op. It’s not meant to be humane. It’s meant to destabilize societies and countries, bring on chaos, destroy traditional cultures and borders, and permit Globalization to advance.

Continue Reading At:

Trump – Why Bilderberg, WEF/Davos & CFR Have Shingles

Jon Rappoport
January 23, 2016

The Donald shoots from the hip and changes his tune every few minutes. True. He thinks about one thing, and that reminds him of something else, and then he goes off on that. However, as he keeps talking and talking and talking, he’s deciding that some of what he’s saying makes sense. He’s firming up his belief in his own sales-pitch. He’s doubling down and getting serious.

And one of the things he’s serious about is trade deals. Bad Globalist deals. Deals that steal more American jobs. He and Bernie Sanders wouldn’t admit it, but they both agree on this general point.

In fact, a new study out of Tufts University torpedoes glowing estimates of the latest such deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). The study authors predict the consequences: another 450,000 jobs will be lost in the US by 2025. Oops. Another Globalist trade treaty sucks life out of the American economy. Which is precisely why Obama is obsessed with passing it.

(The study is titled “Trading Down: Unemployment, Inequality and Other Risks of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement.” A quick breakdown of the study is on, here; free access to the full paper is on, here)

Bilderberg and the Council on Foreign Relations and Rockefeller Globalists are counting on the TPP. It’s one of their precious babies. They want to undermine the US economy. It’s part of their sink-America program, to pave the way for One United Planet under one management system. Not an American empire. A globalist empire.

And they don’t want some out-of-control US Presidential candidate, whose crowds and poll numbers keep swelling like a massive infection, to swipe and swipe and swipe at these trade treaties and dream up ways to bring more jobs back home. They definitely don’t want that—especially after their current marionette in the White House has done such fine work drowning the economic life of the US. The issuance of new credit cards and part-time work at fast-food joints pouring chocolate on French fries don’t equal renewed prosperity, in case you were fooled by official economic-indicator reports.

These elite Globalist don’t believe for a minute that Trump alone can turn back the clock on their ongoing destruction. But they do realize he can keep talking about it. And in doing so, he can force more people to wake up to the fact that they’re being screwed—and how they’re being screwed.

Globalism is all about allowing mega-corporations to take their factories and jobs out of the country overseas. It’s a cornerstone of every trade deal. Mega-corps can manufacture their products more cheaply in a hell hole with slave workers, and then export those products back here (and to other industrialized countries)—and pay no tariffs. How sweet (and destructive) it is.

Continue Reading At:


Techie’s Diapers In A Twist Over Trump’s Apple Remark


Jon Rappoport
January 20, 2016

Trump just said he’d force Apple to make their damn computers in America, and this raised a crib-howl from techies. You know, those super-intelligent “humanitarian progressives” who somehow finesse the fact that their cherished gizmos are manufactured in foreign factories where the workers are virtual slaves.

Techies: “Slaves? Just the cost of doing business. We still love everybody.”

For the moment, to avoid ad hominem arguments, let’s forget that Trump made the remark; and let’s also forget that truly free markets don’t exist on a macro scale.

Here is the obvious knock-you-in-the-face truth: you can’t have a level playing field if you allow US companies to go abroad, set up factories in places where their costs are minimal, and export those products back to the US. That kind of operation destroys companies who are making the same products in America, at much higher costs.

This isn’t economics. You don’t need algorithms to figure it out. You don’t need experts to weigh in with their fatuous bloviations. Anybody with three active brain cells can see the truth.

Here is the bottom line: free markets, to the degree they exist, were never designed for international trade. They were designed for national economies.

In order to make international trade work, you have (you had) tariffs. A company abroad, no matter who owns it, can only ship goods into the US for sale if it pays a big fat tax to level the field.

But then it all changed: no-tariff free trade entered the scene. This was the invention of Globalists, whose ambition was to “liberate mega-corporations” from any and all reasonable obligations, so they could roam the world minus any allegiance to their home countries, and basically act as predators.

This is GATT, the WTO, NAFTA, CAFTA, the upcoming TPP, and so on. Treaties.

Let’s say there are 50 companies in the US who make sneakers here. The average cost of a pair is $2. That’s the manufacturing cost. Four of these companies shut their plants in the US and go to China, where they make a pair for 16 cents. They bring all those sneakers back here for sale. What happens to the other 46 American companies who are still making their sneakers here? Get the correct answer and you earn an A in Globalism 101.

Continue Reading At:

Migration, Globalism, Traditional Culture & The Individual


Jon Rappoport
January 20, 2016

“In the dialectical view of history, you have a force that gives rise to its opposite. The two forces then compete, thus creating a third new force—which gives rise to its opposite and competes with it, giving birth to yet a new force, and so forth, on and on, as the process continues. You could visualize it as a series of triangles piled on top of each other. This dialectical analysis has merit, either as a picture of how history operates, or as a portrait of how history is intentionally manipulated by elites. However, it is incomplete. It doesn’t tell the whole story. It’s a kind of shorthand. What it leaves out is the most important thing of all.”

Globalism fully intends to create one integrated planet under a top-down, locked-down political and economic management system, backed up by coercion.

In order to achieve this goal, as I’ve written before, the notion of separate nations must be eradicated.

The primary goal of the provoked chaos in the Middle East and parts of Africa is: redraw that whole territory and push waves of immigrants into the West, primarily Europe.

Re-work the population-demographics of Europe so no nation looks as it once did. Flood the continent with immigrants. Drown traditional cultures and ethnic identities. Eventually, make it easy to have a nationless Europe, broken from its past.

Consider this Globalist operation a dialectical force. What it gives rise to—its opposite—is a reborn resistance of groups formed around national and ethnic identities, traditional and even ancient cultures. You can see this happening in Europe now.

Whether you like it or don’t like it, it’s taking place. This is the coming struggle of two forces. What they will give rise to—the new force—is open to analysis and speculation.

But for many centuries, something else has been happening in Europe. Something vitally important. Its progress has not been even. There have been severe setbacks. The “upward trend” has been anything but smooth. You can trace part of it by studying the declining power of kings and the rise of “rights of the people.” This movement has not been a church. It hasn’t been a single unified group at all. It flared up in England, France, Germany, and other countries, died down, and was resuscitated again, in stronger forms.

It eventually took on clearer features.

Its substance and goal was the emancipation of the individual.

Freedom, liberty, choice, power—at the level of the single human being, not the group.

And along with that freedom was the tacit and necessary conclusion that the individual could create his own future and existence, apart not only from a ruling force, but also apart from any tradition he did not choose to adhere to.

This was heady material, to say the least. It was revolutionary on every level. And it wasn’t popular with any government, or any group that looked to the past for its identity.

Nevertheless, the “movement” advanced. In many cases, artists paved the way. So did certain philosophers.

Continue Reading At: