Paul, Trump and Sanders Show Elite Control of Society Has Fractured

breakingchains
Source: TheDailyBell.com
October 12, 2016

Republican Politicians Have Only Their Fears to Blame …  In calls this morning, many Rs privately want to defect from Trump. But they say the debate gave them pause since he roused their base. … Remember, there were already an unusual number of high-profile Republicans who had broken with their own nominee, with many saying they would support Hillary Clinton and others just refusing to vote for Trump.   Why did it take so long for the rejection to build? -Bloomberg

Bloomberg thinks rejecting Trump is an obvious choice for Republicans but this article doesn’t recognize the larger trend is to reject modern Republicanism itself.

This really started with the GOP’s removal of conservative libertarian candidate Ron Paul from political contention by intimidating his supporters and unilaterally changing and suspending rules. This sort of approach to non GOP-approved candidates has continued with Trump.

Ron Paul, who wanted to educate more than he wanted to win, was nonetheless squashed by a variety of evil and panicked GOP attacks. Donald Trump recast many of Ron Paul’s views but basically moved down Ron Paul’s political track and due to his celebrity and wealth succeeded where Ron Paul had failed.

Ron Paul was anti-tax, anti-central bank and anti-war. So is Trump, though Trump is closer to the elite mainstream than Paul. But the GOP leadership is pro-tax (though it pretends not to be) … also pro-central bank and pro-war.

The GOP leadership and the Democratic leadership are aligned on most points. It’s the details that are different. But the bulk of GOP supporters take GOP rhetoric at face value. They are specifically, legitimately libertarian in many ways.

The difference lies in the support of the military, but even here, GOP support at the base is far more nuanced than GOP leadership. Support for American wars involves perceptions of necessity. In other words, there is not unlimited support.

Both Ron Paul and now Trump hold views that are in many ways closer to the views of the GOP base. This is why Ron Paul was so successful when he ran a second time after people came to understand his views. This is why Trump has been successful.

More:

This is what responsible Republican leaders (or just self-interested ones) needed to do early this year: Get over their exaggerated fear of their voters and get behind a tolerable candidate such as Marco Rubio or John Kasich (or, earlier, Jeb Bush or Scott Walker or even Bobby Jindal or Rick Perry or whomever).

Or they could have bit the bullet in late spring, when they still had the option of Ted Cruz and Kasich.   Or they could have denied Trump the nomination, even after the primaries were over. They had enough votes collectively to do that. Trump was far short of the majority he needed without additional support from the Republican National Committee.

This excerpt above represents a complete misunderstanding about what’s going on. Voters have simply decided that mainstream politics is ineffective and destructive.

This is why Bernie Sanders did so well as an “outsider” along with Paul and Trump. It is a trend that’s not going away. It’s getting stronger, if anything.

Now just because we recognize a trend doesn’t mean either party is going to fall in line with popular sentiment. The rhetoric may shift a little but taxes, regulations and government intrusions into daily life will continue and expand. This is in true not just for the US but for the West generally.

But the Internet itself has verbalized what’s actually wrong with leadership positions and this process will continue even if the Internet itself is censored.

Continue Reading At: TheDailyBell.com

Growing Concerns About Russia’s Electronic Warfare Capabilities…

 GROWING CONCERNS ABOUT RUSSIA’S ELECTRONIC WARFARE CAPABILITIES: ...
GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
August 25, 2016

Ever since the USS Donald Cook incident, there’s been growing concern – finally being voiced by American and Western military leaders – that Russia’s capabilities in electronic warfare, and in particular the ability to jam western communications and radar – is far more sophisticated than once thought, and now the concerns are over new “invisibility” technologies Russia is allegedly developing:

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/this-cloak-makes-russian-military-invisible-to-enemy-for-first-time-these-weapons-do-exist_08122016/embed?wmode=transparent#?secret=p98II5OvUS

What interests me here is something far beyond the invisibility assertion. What interests me rather are the assessments of Russian capabilities, first revealed in the USS Donald Cook incident. You’ll recall that an old Russian Sukhoi-24 fighter bomber approached the US naval frigate in the Black Sea, when suddenly the ship’s electronics and computer systems went down. The Russian jet then made no less than twelve passes over the American ship on mock attack runs. At the time, US authorities denied the two events were linked, even as the Donald Cook made for the nearest Rumanian port of Constanza for “rest and repairs”, also, we were assured, having nothing to do with the incident. In short, we were being told that the old Russian fighter has nothing whatsoever to do with the equipment and electronics failure on the frigate.

Nothing to see here, nothing to be concerned about, move along.

But now, if one reads the article closely, it appears that some military leaders are challenging that narrative:

Lieutenant General Ben Hodges, the commander of the US army in Europe, has described Russian advances in electronic warfare in Syria and Ukraine – a field in which they were typically supposed to be backward – as “eye watering”.

[…] Moscow is now deploying anti-aircraft systems in Crimea… It is doing so, he says, in a way that makes it “very, very difficult” for Nato planes to gain access safely to areas including parts of Poland. 

Mr Putin has relished pointing out the significance of the West seeing “for the first time that these weapons do exist, that they are of high quality, and that we have well-trained people who can put them to effective use. They have now seen, too, that Russia is ready to use them…”

The article itself goes on to put this in perspective:

These unbelievably powerful applications in electromagnetic (EMF) warfare are game changers, and Russia has made significant strides in dominating the war zones of the future, for better or worse.

Russia has been shutting down and disabling U.S. ships and equipment around the world.

So where’s the high octane speculation here?

Well, note that Russia has been revealing and using these technologies operationally and tactically, not strategically. But their mere existence and the Russians’ willingness to reveal their existence by demonstrable use, against American targets, has got to have the midnight oil burning in the Pentagram and American intelligence agencies. And what probably has them concerned is, given the fact that the Russians were supposed to be “behind” in such capabilities, when in fact, they’re demonstrably not, raises the stakes and implications considerably, for this might mean it has an unrevealed strategic capability of a similar nature. and such an unrevealed strategic capability would mean that those neocon hopes and deliberations for “first strike” use of nuclear weapons might not turn out so well. To put it as plainly as possible…

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com
_______________________________________________________________

Profile photo of Joseph P. Farrell
Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

Princeton Professor Shows How Easy It Is To Hack An Election In Just 7 Minutes

[Editor’s Note]

As if what the following article suggests isn’t enough, here is additional data that shows what a fallacy voting is:

ELECTION RIGGING 101 – Election Shocker: Is This How The Election Will Be Rigged?  | JonRappoport

hacked
Source: ActivistPost.com
Claire Bernish
August 8, 2016

A professor from Princeton University and a graduate student just proved electronic voting machines in the U.S. remain astonishingly vulnerable to hackers — and they did it in under eight minutes.

In fact, Professor Andrew Appel and grad student Alex Halderman took just seven minutes to break into the authentic Sequoia AVC Advantage electronic voting machine Appel purchased for $82 online — one of the oldest models, but still in use Louisiana, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Virginia, Politico reported.

After Halderman picked the hulking, 250-pound machine’s lock in seven seconds flat, Appel wrested its four ROM chips from a circuit board — an easy feat, considering the chips weren’t soldered in place.

Once freed, Appel could facilely replace the ROM chips with his own version “of modified firmware that could throw off the machine’s results, subtly altering the tally of votes, never to betray a hint to the voter,” Politico’s Ben Wofford explained.

Appel and a team of other so-called cyber-academics have hacked into various models of electronic voting machines in order to prove to the public the equipment is ridiculously bereft of security. Together with Ed Felten, Appel and a group of Princeton students “relentlessly hacked one voting machine after another … reprogramming one popular machine to play Pac-Man; infecting popular models with self-duplicating malware; [and] discovering keys to voting machine locks that could be ordered on eBay.”

Their efforts have gone largely ignored for 15 years.

But now, thanks to the explosion of controversy from revealing documents hacked from the DNC — and as-yet unproven accusations of Russian involvement — Appel and his colleagues’ persistence has finally garnered the attention it deserves.

If primaries were successfully rigged through corporate media collusion and behind-the-scenes coordination between the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign, voters will certainly wonder what’s in store when they cast ballots using deeply-vulnerable electronic voting machines.

Perhaps that lack of security prompted the Department of Homeland Security to declare electronic voting machines part of U.S. “critical infrastructure” this week — a designation generally reserved for 16 sectors, including transportation systems, dams, and utilities, among other things — deemed “so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect on security, national economic security, national public health or safety, or any combination thereof.”

Now that attention has been given to the ease with which a number of popular, still-employed voting machines can be compromised, officials and voters alike have expressed grave concerns about the upcoming election.

“This isn’t a crazy hypothetical anymore,” Dan Wallach, a computer science professor at Rice and veteran of the team of Princeton ‘hackers,’ noted. “Once you bring nation states’ cyber activity into the game?” he hinted of potential Russian connections to the DNC hack and possible implications of foreign meddling in the national election. “These machines, they barely work in a friendly environment.”

Thirty-one prominent security experts with the Aspen Institute Homeland Security Group issued a statement in response to the DNC hack at the end of July, imploring precautions be taken because “[o]ur electoral process could be a target for reckless foreign governments and terrorist groups.”

“Look, we could see 15 years ago that this would be perfectly possible,” Appel told Wofford. “It’s well within the capabilities of a country as sophisticated as Russia.”

He added ominously, “Actually, it’s well within the capabilities of much less well-funded and sophisticated attackers.”

Electronic voting machines hit the U.S. electoral process in full force following the ‘hanging chad’ controversy in the Bush-Gore race in 2000, in which ballots had to be hand-counted. Ludicrous pictures inundated the news, showing elections officials assiduously examining paper ballots to determine if partially-punched choices equated actual votes in the tight race — a scene officials hoped electronic voting machines would avoid repeating.

But those machines presented notorious problems of their own.

As Wofford explained:

The Princeton group has a simple message: That the machines that Americans use at the polls are less secure than the iPhones they use to navigate their way there. They’ve see the skeletons of code inside electronic voting’s digital closet, and they’ve mastered the equipment’s vulnerabilities perhaps better than anyone (a contention the voting machine companies contest, of course). They insist the elections could be vulnerable at myriad strike points, among them the software that aggregates the precinct vote totals, and the voter registration rolls that are increasingly digitized. But the threat, the cyber experts say, starts with the machines that tally the votes and crucially keep a record of them — or, in some cases, don’t.

Because this electronic equipment is now horribly outdated — some machines’ manufacturers no longer offer tech support — and considered, in large part, a ‘failed experiment,’ much has been phased out for better options. But not completely — and those better options still can be easily tampered with, according to Appel and his team.

Indeed, the issues with electronic voting methods are too voluminous to recount in a single article, though Wofford does provide a thorough, albeit lengthy, summary here.

As voters prepare to putatively choose the next American president in November, tales of rigged elections — from the primaries to the presidency — continue to top headlines across the country. With the sheer mountain of political funny business already evidenced this year, electronic voting machines don’t offer anywhere near the sound comfort of retribution the voting public craves.

Read More At: ActivistPost.com

Claire Bernish writes for TheFreeThoughtProject.com, where this article first appeared.

Jon Rappoport Interview With Andy Young & Jason Holmes Regarding Big Psychiatry, Drugs, Transhumanism, The Elections, & More

Source: AlteredGEMedia.com
March 17, 2016

It was a real honour to be joined by Jon Rappoport who has written for newspapers and magazines before freeing himself from the restrictions of the mainstream media by self publishing on the web.

We started off by having a chat about what is really happening behind the show and razzmatazz of the US elections.

We then moved on to discussing at some length trans humanism in it’s many manifestations and how we are all being slowly drawn into this creeping agenda.

Jon is a great speaker and we could have chatted with him all night had his busy schedule not prevented it.

We also heard from Jon about his research into psychiatry and how it is all basically pseudo-science and that all psychiatric disorders are entirely made up.

He has also done a lot of research into the damaging effects of the drugs prescribed for these “conditions” and how they so often lead those taking them to commit suicide.

A big thank you to Jon & to everyone for listening to our Jon Rappoport Interview , and supporting us through 2015 and into 2016 😀

You can keep up with Jon’s amazing work by visiting his website NoMoreFakeNews.com & JonRappoport.wordpress.com

The Criminalization Of Politics: Hillary Accused Of Rackeering By The FBI, Will She Be Dumped From Presidential Race?

Hillary-Clinton-300x300
Source: GlobalResearch.com
Prof. Michel Chossudovsky
May 30, 2016

In a recent release, the FBI has indicated that it will be presenting a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice:

“James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.”  (quoted by Frank Huguenand, Global Research, May 30, 2016)

There are several possible scenarios which affect the outcome of the presidential campaign.

The fundamental question is whether this recommendation –which documents the criminal undertakings of the Clinton Foundation– will be carried out by the Attorney General.

Doubtful?

Loretta Lynch was appointed Attorney General by president Obama in 2010 during his first term. Of significance, Lynch also held the position of U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York under the Bill Clinton administration (1999-2001).

Moreover, as pointed out in a recent article by Jerome Corsi, Loretta Lynch is political crony of the Clintons:

But little known is the fact that Lynch was a litigation partner for eight years at a major Washington law firm that served the Clintons.

Lynch was with the Washington-headquartered international law firm Hogan & Hartson LLP from March 2002 through April 2010.

According to documents Hillary Clinton’s first presidential campaign made public in 2008, Hogan & Hartson’s New York-based partner Howard Topaz was the tax lawyer who filed income tax returns for Bill and Hillary Clinton beginning in 2004.

In addition, Hogan & Hartson in Virginia filed a patent trademark request on May 19, 2004, for Denver-based MX Logic Inc., the computer software firm that developed the email encryption system used to manage Clinton’s private email server beginning in July 2013. A tech expert has observed that employees of MX Logic could have had access to all the emails that went through her account.

The appointment of Attorney General Loretta Lynch, 2010

It is, therefore, highly unlikely that Lynch will follow the recommendation of James Comey and the FBI.

Nonetheless, even if the indictment is NOT carried out, inevitably Hillary Clinton’s “credibility” as a presidential candidate is in jeopardy.

Hillary: “Losing Horse”

The corporate media may attempt to cover up or distort the findings of the FBI and manipulate public opinion with a view to supporting Hillary’s candidacy.

A process of smearing the FBI is already ongoing. Will it  succeed? Hillary’s reputation has been tainted. A suspected criminal cannot become president of the USA, whether the legal procedure against her is carried out or not.

And the Donald Trump campaign will go into high gear to discredit Hillary Clinton.

Under these circumstances, the Democratic Party hierarchy (not to mention Hillary’s corporate sponsors) may decide to dump Hillary Clinton. Hillary’s Wall Street cronies will not bet their money on a “losing horse”.

Assuming Clinton falls out of the presidential race, what happens?

This scenario has already been contemplated and carefully rehearsed ahead of Hillary’s demise. 

Will the nomination go to Bernie Sanders or will Joe Biden formally enter the race as a “slip in” candidate:

If Clinton’s email-related problems get worse or other developments sink her popularity far below even Trump’s, causing her to step aside, Biden, as a more establishment figure than Sanders, would be the party’s likely choice as a “slip-in” candidate and an almost certain winner against Trump.Notwithstanding these various scenarios, Donald Trump is ahead in the presidential race. (Chicago Tribune, May 27, 2016)

Continue Reading At: GlobalResearch.com

Breakaway Links Of The Day – 5-26-2016

Breakaway

TheBreakaway
Zy Marquiez
May 26, 2016

Monsanto has a big target on its back, as multiple articles showcase.  Then again, when they bring us countless toxins linked to myriad diseases and side effects, its no wonder the people are waking up in droves.

Clinton corruption is also at the forefront, as it should be.

Yet, the most notable read comes from TheDailyBell, where they tackle the ever-growing trends of Internet Reformation and what that portends.  If you read only one thing, please read that.

Have a great day everyone.

Physics, Free Will & ‘The Spiritual CIA’
Rappoport discusses how our reality is nefariously molded, and carefully controlled.
[NoMoreFakeNews.com | Jon Rappoport]

The Saker On That Common EU Army Thing: A Way To Loosen The Grip Of…
[GizaDeathStar.com | Dr. Joseph P. Farrell]

Clinton Email Scandal A Golden Opportunity For Sanders Camp
[RT America | Anaya Parampil]

Farmers Sue Monsanto Over Allegations Of Cancer
[NaturalSociety.com | Anna Scanlon]

Mysterious Underground Structures Built 175,000 Years Ago By Ancient Humans
[Ancient-Code.com | Ivan]

The Amazing Glyphosate Revolt Grows – F. William Engdahl
[Journal-Neo.org | F. William Engdahl]

The Fed’s Massive Biometric Database
A disturbing trend that is getting worse with time.
[RT America | Anya Parampil]

Harvard Scientists Say There May Be An Ancient Earth Inside Our Planet
[Ancient-Code.com]

Internet Reformation: The Awakening Progresses Undeterred By Current Elections
This is a very deep, and salient read [analysis] into how the Internet Reformation is helping those who wish to take advantage of those options available to them.
[TheDailyBell.com]

Facebook Deliberately Censors Content On Certain Topics, Including Vaccines & Immigration
Tell us something we DON’T know.  Its all part of keeping the carefully orchestrated reality on par with what the establishment would like us to beLIEve. 
[NaturalNews.com | J.D. Heyes]

Clinton Took $21 Million In Corporate Speaking Fees In Just Two Years
[RT America]

Tom Campbell: OBE France
Physicist and consciousness researcher Tom Campbell discusses how Out Of Body Experiences fit into his ‘My Big Toe’ theory, and how that correlates to the individual consciousness. 
[Tom Campbell]

Doctors In Australia Ordered To Prescribe Fewer Antidepressants
For more information on how depression is not a disease, but a symptom, please read Dr. Kelly Brogan’s “A Mind Of Your Own – The Truth About Depression.”  You will not regret it.
[NaturalSociety.com | Julie Fidler]

FLASHBACK: Government Agencies Pumped Lead Into Washington DC Residents’ Drinking Water & Covered It Up For 3 Years
[NaturalNews.com | Julie Wilson]

Monsanto’s Cotton Rejected Again: Burnika Faso Brings Back Indigenous Varieties
[Underground Reporter.org | Christina Sarich]

 

Clinton Took $21 Million In Corporate Speaking Fees In Just Two Years

Source: RT America
May 26, 2016

The phrase “money in politics’ has been said so much this election cycle, you might start to tune it out. Let this story shout the phrase from a mountain top to make sure it doesn’t become just another meaningless mantra. The Resident breaks it down.