Dr. Joseph P. Farrell Speaks At Length About The Election, Rampant Voter Fraud, Mainstream Media Failing, Solutions & Much More

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
November 11, 2016

Paul, Trump and Sanders Show Elite Control of Society Has Fractured

Source: TheDailyBell.com
October 12, 2016

Republican Politicians Have Only Their Fears to Blame …  In calls this morning, many Rs privately want to defect from Trump. But they say the debate gave them pause since he roused their base. … Remember, there were already an unusual number of high-profile Republicans who had broken with their own nominee, with many saying they would support Hillary Clinton and others just refusing to vote for Trump.   Why did it take so long for the rejection to build? -Bloomberg

Bloomberg thinks rejecting Trump is an obvious choice for Republicans but this article doesn’t recognize the larger trend is to reject modern Republicanism itself.

This really started with the GOP’s removal of conservative libertarian candidate Ron Paul from political contention by intimidating his supporters and unilaterally changing and suspending rules. This sort of approach to non GOP-approved candidates has continued with Trump.

Ron Paul, who wanted to educate more than he wanted to win, was nonetheless squashed by a variety of evil and panicked GOP attacks. Donald Trump recast many of Ron Paul’s views but basically moved down Ron Paul’s political track and due to his celebrity and wealth succeeded where Ron Paul had failed.

Ron Paul was anti-tax, anti-central bank and anti-war. So is Trump, though Trump is closer to the elite mainstream than Paul. But the GOP leadership is pro-tax (though it pretends not to be) … also pro-central bank and pro-war.

The GOP leadership and the Democratic leadership are aligned on most points. It’s the details that are different. But the bulk of GOP supporters take GOP rhetoric at face value. They are specifically, legitimately libertarian in many ways.

The difference lies in the support of the military, but even here, GOP support at the base is far more nuanced than GOP leadership. Support for American wars involves perceptions of necessity. In other words, there is not unlimited support.

Both Ron Paul and now Trump hold views that are in many ways closer to the views of the GOP base. This is why Ron Paul was so successful when he ran a second time after people came to understand his views. This is why Trump has been successful.


This is what responsible Republican leaders (or just self-interested ones) needed to do early this year: Get over their exaggerated fear of their voters and get behind a tolerable candidate such as Marco Rubio or John Kasich (or, earlier, Jeb Bush or Scott Walker or even Bobby Jindal or Rick Perry or whomever).

Or they could have bit the bullet in late spring, when they still had the option of Ted Cruz and Kasich.   Or they could have denied Trump the nomination, even after the primaries were over. They had enough votes collectively to do that. Trump was far short of the majority he needed without additional support from the Republican National Committee.

This excerpt above represents a complete misunderstanding about what’s going on. Voters have simply decided that mainstream politics is ineffective and destructive.

This is why Bernie Sanders did so well as an “outsider” along with Paul and Trump. It is a trend that’s not going away. It’s getting stronger, if anything.

Now just because we recognize a trend doesn’t mean either party is going to fall in line with popular sentiment. The rhetoric may shift a little but taxes, regulations and government intrusions into daily life will continue and expand. This is in true not just for the US but for the West generally.

But the Internet itself has verbalized what’s actually wrong with leadership positions and this process will continue even if the Internet itself is censored.

Continue Reading At: TheDailyBell.com

Did You Really Think Bernie Sanders Was Playing It Straight?

Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappoport
July 14, 2016

—Bernie Sanders can’t just wink and nod at his supporters, letting them know he’s faking his Hillary endorsement. No. He’s in the clutches of the octopus. He’s feathering the vulture’s nest. He’s delivering pints of blood to the vampire—

Bernie Sanders’ followers are moaning and weeping and gnashing their teeth. O the betrayal. O the horror.

He…what? He endorsed Hillary for President?

Yes, indeed.

They supported and voted for Bernie because he was righteous and independent and above party politics. He was for the people. And they hated Hillary.

But now, Bernie has gone over to Her.

Make no mistake. Bernie’s loyal army wasn’t just vehemently battling against Trump. They were repulsed at the prospect of Hillary winning the Presidency.

And now their hero, their idol, the “last honest man in American politics,” has crossed over to The Dark Side.

Well, remember, he gave up his long-time status as an Independent when he entered the race for the Presidency. He joined the Democratic Party. He knew the score. He enrolled on the team. He knew, if he lost, he would have to endorse the Democratic candidate. Play ball, or you don’t get to play at all.

He can’t just wink and nod at his supporters, letting them know he’s faking his Hillary endorsement. No. He’s in the clutches of the octopus. He’s feathering the vulture’s nest. He’s delivering pints of blood to the vampire.

This is big-time Democratic politics. This is major-league. This is when compromises are made and deals are struck. And Bernie isn’t feeling the same burn anymore. This fire is a camp fire, and Bernie is sitting there along with other Party operatives and hustlers and propagandists and strong-arm closers and creatures of the night.

As a last gasp, Bernie tried to insert a plank in the Democratic platform opposing the TPP, another hideous Globalist trade treaty. And he failed. That would have been a good time to revolt and bolt and take a stand against the Party and go back to being an Independent—but it didn’t happen. Bernie ate the poison pill.

Meet Mr. Sanders; a Democrat; a dutiful soldier in the ranks.

Hillary, Ms. Darth Vader, her helmet removed, her blonde hair blowing in the wind, strides down the line, inspecting the troops. When she comes to Bernie, she pauses for a moment and inclines her head an inch toward him in acknowledgement. He was, briefly, a minor opponent. Bernie blinks, like a lost recruit in the middle of a nightmare who doesn’t know how he arrived at this moment. She moves on. She’s on her way. She sees the future.

Far away in the distance, a cry of anguish goes up from a huge rag-tag tattered mass of The Disappointed Ones. Bernie’s people.

Duped again. Bamboozled. Cut loose from the passing vision of a Papier-mache utopia of equality.

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

Hillary’s “Historic Win” Makes Things Worse, Not Better


Source: TheDailyBell.com
June 10, 2016

How Hillary Clinton’s historic win changes the game for girls … So many girls for so long were told — overtly and subtly — what they could and could not be … Regardless of party persuasion, Hillary Clinton’s victory is the definition of historic: She became the first female presidential nominee of a major political party. -CNN

Portions of the mainstream media are celebrating Hillary’s apparent winning of the Democratic presidential nomination.

Hillary may still be indicted and have to give up the nomination but the FBI’s slowness in investigating her email scandal (and bringing charges) has made it harder to remove her.

She is now the presumptive nominee of the Democratic party. She is no longer a candidate.

Removing her would be a historical first and would have a tremendous resonance, beyond what it would have had previously.

She still may be indicted. She still may have to step down. But this looks at least a little bit less likely now.

Certainly Hillary and her supporters would claim that she was being attacked for her gender, not for her actions.

And the “historic” nature of her current position would lend some credence to that accusation, even though fundamentally there would be no truth to it.

There is, in fact, no meaningful truth to any positive claims regarding Hillary’s victory.

The woman’s movement itself is divisive. There’s plenty of evidence that it was promulgated by the same elite banking fraternity that has created other divisive social movements.

The idea is always to divide, manipulate and conquer.

We can see – and have reported on – the paradigm that is being readied in the 21st century. It is one that emphasizes corporatism and elevates multinational companies above nation states.

These multinationals and their affiliates will be dominated by technocrats, men and women of facile intellect who have proven adept at mastering modern, academic curricula.

The technocratic paradigm is a utilitarian one. It includes, especially, the use of local and regional wars to expand power.

The paradigm is built on lies. The structure of authority is created by dominant social themes – propaganda emphasizing scarcity and the necessity for large regulatory enterprises – to construct solutions.

Problems include global warming, terrorism and economic malfunction. But humans are not responsible for global warming, if it exists.

The war on terror is basically an invention of Western intelligence organizations such as the CIA, Mossad and MI6.

The current “greater depression” is directly attributable to the world’s monopoly central banking economy and its endless, ruinous debasement of currency.

Hillary Clinton, and people like her, are enablers.

Her assumption of the office of presidency, if it occurs, will take place because she can be counted on to support the current agenda.

Her reign will feature more wars, more economic ruin and a continued draining away of Western power and prosperity.

She will enhance globalism.  She will continue to destroy Western civilization.

Those who support her are supporting the further destruction of their families, their children’s future and their culture.

Hillary, if made president, will continue Obama’s policies. And Obama himself is a globalist.

There are many personal and professional accusations that can be leveled at Hillary and her husband. These range from murder and rape to Libyan and Syrian genocide.

But the personal issues, bad as they may be, are not nearly so important as her agenda.

She is a believer in international regulatory authority and in using violence in order to achieve “one world” goals.  The result of the currently planned globalism is to be the further implementation of fascist authoritarianism ending in genocide.

The famous Georgia Guidestones indicate that the ideal population worldwide is in the area of 500 million. That means billions must be removed.

Conclusion: Hillary becoming president? There will be more wars, less economic prosperity and the gradual, continual erosion of freedom and further blossoming of fascism. And then worse and worse …

Read More At: TheDailyBell.com

IRS Malfeasance Gives A Glimpse Of Larger Government Corruption

Source: TheDailyBell.com
May 25, 2016

No One Hates the IRS More Than House Republicans … Pity John Koskinen, who agreed to take one of the worst jobs in America and is now being punished for it.  In 2013, President Barack Obama asked Koskinen to take over at the Internal Revenue Service amid budgetary chaos, deteriorating morale and a simmering scandal. House Republicans are now trying to impeach him.  – Bloomberg

We don’t pity John Koskinen. We watched a good deal of the IRS hearings as they unfolded and it was fairly obvious a cover-up was taking place.

The people involved either weren’t telling the truth or were subject to convenient memory lapses.

It was obvious that higher-up officials at the IRS, presumably at the behest of the Obama administration, has schemed to delay the non profit status of Tea Party groups opposed to Obama.

It was obvious as well that no matter how much evidence was collected by the committee under Republican leadership, the Democratic Department of Justice would not bring an indictment.

And it did not.

IRS officials destroyed emails by “accident” while blaming the actions of the IRS on out-of-control low level individuals.

The woman at the center of the scandal, Lois Lerner, resigned and took the fifth. The Committee talked about indicting her as a first step to putting her in prison, but nothing has happened.

The cover-up went all the way to the top. Koskinen himself, while giving the appearance of being cooperative, always seemed a step behind the investigation.

There were many things he didn’t know about. And after a while it became obvious that he didn’t want to know.

Koskinen’s job, as an Obama appointee, was to clean up and move on.


Blame was duly apportioned … The agency’s boss resigned, a top deputy retired, and the director of the offending unit was placed on leave and declared in contempt of Congress. Half a dozen congressional committees vowed to fumigate every pixel of offending detail. One managed to produce an 8,000-page report.

It certainly sounds like there were repercussions, but not really. Someone retired. Ms. Lerner was questioned by Congress. A voluminous report was produced and ignored.

Delaying non profit status of anti-Obama groups was only the latest IRS sin.

A previous scandal saw the IRS apologizing for what reports called “a lavish 2010 conference in California that included an elaborate Star Trek spoof training video.”

The entire conference cost upwards of $3 million and the IRS later warned expenses could exceed $5 million.

The agency didn’t know exactly how much because no one was keeping track of costs.

And that’s the real problem: government doesn’t operate like a normal business.

Continue Reading At: TheDailyBell.com

Gun Control Aims to Disarm the People, Not Save Lives

Source: TheDailyBell.com
May 17, 2016

It’s impossible, in this day and age, to pick up a stranger’s password-protected mobile phone and send a text. It’s easy to steal anyone’s gun and fire away … So President Barack Obama wants the government to assist in the development of smart-gun technology, which has the potential to reduce the number of preventable deaths.  – Bloomberg

Obama’s is trying to control guns again. And this is the proximate cause for articles like this Bloomberg opinion piece about how necessary it is to stop gun violence by any means necessary.

But the larger issue is one that is not often pointed out.

It is actually quite unbelievable that this incessant effort to make guns more difficult to use is entirely motivated by well-meaning individuals  who want to protect our loved ones from deadly weapons.

Anyone who has had even occasional interactions with US governments at state or federal levels – especially on the East or West coasts – is well aware of the bureaucratic rigidity.

Whether it is the prosecution of military conflict around the world, the imposition of questionable taxes domestically, adult sentences for juveniles or prisoners placed in solitary confinement for years or decades, the vast scope of the US empire renders it essentially uncaring.

It is hard to conceive of bureaucracies being caring anyway. Cultures tend to be caring, but not sociopolitical entities.

Nonetheless, this Bloomberg article makes the argument that gun legislation is being promoted entirely out of caring and concern.

The need is great. At least 278 children unintentionally killed or injured someone with a gun last year, and at least 84 have done so already in 2016. Additional suicides and murders have been committed by people using guns that did not belong to them.

This effort could soon move beyond courts and legislation. All that stands in the way for now is the California federal appeals court ruling.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the California federal appeals court will rule at any moment “on whether states can force firearm manufacturers to incorporate safety devices in their products.”

If it makes a favorable ruling to states, then expect to see a surge of gun control technology that will make it more and more difficult to operate guns.

States – pursuant to the ruling – could mandate that one has to wear a ring that facilitates the firing of a gun at close proximity. No ring, no operation.

Continue Reading At: TheDailyBell.com

Inside the liberal minds of Clooney, Streisand, Julia


Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappoport
April 11, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.)

“The complexity of any mind-control program is a function of the people who are meant to be controlled. In Hollywood, you’re dealing with the most gullible, and therefore the tactic is simple. One feint, and then deliver the poison to the target.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

I’ll keep the introductory background brief: political rulers need dupes. They court the famous and rich for their money; and for their vocal support, because the majority of the public adores stars. Stars are archetypes who live the lives “regular people” dream about. So if stars are fawning at the feet of a certain brand of politician, the public will tend to fawn as well. By proxy. By extension. By default.

At a Hollywood fundraiser a few days ago, Obama mingled with Julia Roberts, Gwyneth Paltrow, James Brolin, Julia Louis-Dreyfuss, and Barbara Streisand. There was no mention of George Clooney. But don’t worry; next month, he’s co-hosting a Hillary event with Steven Spielberg.

Liberal lovefests, check-writing bonanzas.

Let’s brush aside the obvious fact that, in Hollywood, it’s good to be on the Left. Good for the career.

Let’s also dispense with the sober: “Given two choices, the Democrats are better than the Republicans.”

Inside the minds of these stars, something else is going on. And it certainly isn’t a preoccupation with limiting the power of mega-corporations, who roam the world and feast on vulnerable populations, their lands and resources. The Democratic leadership (Obama, Hillary) have no interest in curtailing that operation. They’re all for it.

So what is happening in the skulls of these liberal stars, beyond political-Left conditioned reflexes?

You might say: not much. And you’d be right. But still…

It all goes back to this: “help others.”

That’s the mantra.

“Help the less fortunate.”

Tucked away in stars’ minds, you might find a few socialist ideas, a few Marxist sentiments, but the big one is: “help the less fortunate.”

This vague nugget has been with them for a long time. It isn’t thought out. It certainly isn’t the lead sentence in a comprehensive understanding. Are you kidding?

For some stars, there are crusty bits of motivating image: the old Hollywood blacklist, the McCarthy hearings, the board that used to censor movies, the early civil rights movement.

For others, it’s more recent material. The anti-war protests of the 60s, smoking weed, Watergate and Nixon, the “unfair pummeling” of Bill Clinton over his affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Mainly, “helping the less fortunate” casts a wide, wide net; and not much thinking is required. That’s a plus. Let the best politicians on the Left work out the details.

However, an unlimited number of crimes are cooked up behind this Humanitarian Hustle. For example, through “greater-equality” Globalist trade treaties, we have the creation of an expanding unemployed American underclass, terminally dependent on government for survival. For example, bringing “democracy and freedom” to backward nations actually results in predatory empire-building, destabilization, chaos, pain, death. That sort of thing.

“We pity those who can’t survive on their own” holds a foul patronizing odor, especially when the political implementation of that self-righteous notion buries the less fortunate in a swamp worse than the one they’re trying to get out of.

But again, these Hollywood stars aren’t noted for thinking things through.

Instead, they jump from the central mantra to other empty generalities: e.g., more access to education and healthcare and community programs.

Yes, that’ll solve it. The US medical system kills 225,000 people a year, dispenses highly toxic psychiatric drugs like candy; education produces lower literacy rates, is little more than baby-sitting and indoctrination-in-values; and community programs are just a way of saying, “Look, we’re doing something.”

But now we’re going too deep for Hollywood. Please. Back off. Let’s stick with the high-flying generalities. “It allows us to feel good. And we must feel good. We’re rich and we’re sensitive human beings, so we need to hitch our wagons to a fairy tale of progress, even if there isn’t any.”

George Clooney, I have to say, is a real piece of work. He can make a movie like Syriana, which excruciatingly tracks a mega-corporate/political/intel monstrosity collaborating to produce planetary tyranny, and he supports Hillary Clinton, who’s never seen one of these monstrosities she didn’t love in real life.

And here I have to return to a story I’ve been pounding on for the last week or so: the film Vaxxed (trailer), which exposes criminal fraud at the CDC, where fake science was consciously deployed to give the MMR vaccine a free pass and pretend it had no connection to autism.

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com


Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

MSNBC Host Admits Democratic Primary Rigged, While Station Simultaneously Rigs Coverage

Screen Shot 2016-03-17 at 3.08.44 PM

Source: LibertyBlitzkrieg.com
Michael Krieger
March 29, 2016

While it might sound strange, a coronation of Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary will mark the end of the party as we know it. There’s been a lot written about the “Sanders surge,” with much of it revolving around Hillary Clinton’s extreme personal weakness as a candidate. While this is indisputable, it’s also a convenient way for the status quo to exempt itself from fault and discount genuine grassroots anger. I’m of the view that Sanders’ support is more about people liking him than them disliking Hillary, particularly when it comes to registered Democrats. He’s not merely seen as the “least bad choice.” People really do like him.

The Sanders appeal is twofold. He is seen as unusually honest and consistent for someone who’s held elected office for much of his life, plus he advocates a refreshingly anti-establishment view on core issues that matter to an increasing number of Americans. These include militarism, Wall Street bailouts, a two-tiered justice system, the prohibitive cost of college education, healthcare insecurity and a “rigged economy.” While Hillary is being forced to pay lip service to these issues, everybody knows she doesn’t mean a word of it. She means it less than Obama meant it in 2008, and Obama really didn’t mean it.

– From the post: It’s Not Just the GOP – The Democratic Party is Also Imploding

I just finished watching a surprisingly good and honest 14 minute segment on MSNBC’s Morning Joe which covered how the Democratic National Committee has been rigging the primary in favor of Hillary Clinton. Host Joe Scarborough even went so far as to admit the media’s complicity in the process with regard to superdelegates. He notes:

“And I know the Republican party wishes they rigged the process as well as the Democratic party did right now, because they could rig it against Trump — but the Democratic party rigs their process so that these superdelegates, which by the way can move any direction they want, actually skew the process and the reporting so badly that the voters actually don’t have their say when it comes to voting.”

This is a key issue that has been driving me up a wall lately. It is journalistic malpractice for media outlets to include superdelegates in the total tally when these Democratic operatives can switch their support at any point between now and the convention. As we learned in the post Did Hillary Clinton Really Win More New Hampshire Delegates Than Sanders Despite a Landslide Loss?

Clinton Corruption:Hillary Clinton Already Chosen by Bilderberg?

Zy Marquiez
March 17, 2016

It has long been the theory of a few people that the globalists would pin Bush vs. Clinton in this latest political s/election.

With Bush out of the fold, only Clinton remains.

Not that politics is an environment that fosters much hope, given how much the populace is trampled with every broken promise, and with every sold out politician, but out of all candidates that could be left, Clinton arguably is the worse by far.

Am not saying politics offers the solution, for the solutions ultimately come from individuals, but what is being stated is that Clinton will definitely continue the pattern of Globalist rule that has already been taking place.

What we can expect are more trade treaties that cost more jobs being shipped out of the country, more attacks on the 2nd amendment and peoples birthrights to defend themselves, Biotech companies like Monsanto & Co. squashing legislation that brings about true change in people’s right to know what’s in their food, further militarization of the police force, a further declining middle class, stagnant wages, more war, and so on.

The fact that someone as deplorable as Clinton with such a disastrous track record is still in politics, or any meaningful position at all shows how corrupt this country has become.  With her at the helm, things will only get worse, much worse.

She’s such an obvious pick of the Bilderberg/Globalists/Elites that’s its sickening.

The plot thickens sickens.

Below follows a video by Sonia, of the TrutherGirls, where she discusses various aspects of Clinton, Politics & even Trump.

Don’t say you weren’t warned.

Source: TrutherGirls

SuperTuesday: Vote Fraud Looming? Flashback To Prop 37

Source: TruthInsideOfYou.org

Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappaport
March 2, 2016

There was the famous 2010 experiment, in which a team from Ann Arbor, Michigan, offered to hack the District of Columbia’s voting system. They broke in and reversed the count in the mayoral election. They also fabricated absentee votes from overseas and canceled out the real votes.” — Jon Rappoport

For the Republicans, 12 states and 661 delegates are up for grabs in the Primaries today. Trump is favored to rack up major wins.

If he doesn’t, and if instead Rubio (the GOP Party bosses’ choice) suddenly emerges, look for vote fraud.

As Paul Watson (Infowars) reported this morning, people in Travis County, Texas, have called KLBJ radio to report their votes for Trump were changed on the touch screens: Rubio’s name came up. That would indicate an intentional programming alteration.

There are obviously several ways to achieve vote fraud: reprogramming machines; reprogramming the transfer process, during which vote-counts from multiple machines are combined and added up; reprogramming an even later stage, during which combined vote-totals are merged at a higher level and reported to a wire service (e.g., AP) and/or the vote registrar in the state where voting is taking place.

Dovetailing with this level of fraud, we have the early premature calls of victory issued by television networks, who usually obtain their information from wire services. These quick calls can act as a cover and a diversion, to dampen the possibility that anyone will challenge the result of the election.

To break this down further, here is my article, from November, 2012, on the California Prop 37 scandal. Prop 37 attempted (and failed) to win voter approval for mandating GMO labels on food:

“Did Prop 37 Really Lose Or Was It Vote Fraud?”

Hold your horses.

On election night, not long after the polls closed in California, the announcement came: Prop 37 was losing. A little while later, it was all over. 37 had gone down to defeat.

But is that the whole story? No.

As of 2:30PM today, Thursday, November 8th, two days after the election, many votes in California remain uncounted.

I tried to find out how many.

It turns out that the Secretary of State of CA, responsible for elections in the state, doesn’t know.

I was told all counties in California have been asked, not ordered, to report in with those figures. It’s voluntary.

So I picked out a few of the biggest counties and called their voter registrar offices. Here are the boggling results:

Santa Clara County: 180,000 votes remain uncounted.

Orange County: 241,336 votes remain uncounted.

San Diego County: 475,000 votes remain uncounted.

LA County: 782,658 votes remain uncounted.

In just those four counties, 1.6 million votes remain uncounted.

The California Secretary of State’s website indicates that Prop 37 is behind by 559,776 votes.

So in the four counties I looked into, there are roughly three times as many uncounted votes as the margin of Prop 37’s defeat.

And as I say, I checked the numbers in only four counties. There are 54 other counties in the state. Who knows how many votes they still need to process?

[Bold Emphasis Added Throughout]

Continue Reading At: JonRappaport.wordpress.com