French Should Expose Government Not Islam Over Neo-Gladio Provocations

whistleblower1
Source: TheDailyBell.com
July 25, 2016

How should France answer to the horror in Nice? The country is now deeply entrenched in a long-term war with few hopes of dodging future attacks. The anger of the French population is understandable. But booing a prime minister at the commemoration ceremony for the loss of innocent lives is not the smartest idea.   No intelligence service could have prevented the Nice attack as nothing in the profile of the lunatic who drove over 84 people could have suggested a potential link to terrorism. – Al Jazeera

We’ve been writing regularly about the meme of “evil Islam” and our perspective that it propaganda – a dominant social theme – intended to create military tension, further authoritarianism and even, eventually, wider wars setting the West against Islam.

You can see our articles HERE and HERE And HERE too.

The lie is that Islam of itself is a terrible threat to the French – and Western – way of life.

The lies are propagated by a tiny group of people who organize fallacious themes that then become Western policy.

Global warming, the economics of central bank – and the dangers of Islam – are all examples of these themes.

The lies are regularly expanded and deepened.

Here is a famous recent quote by the Direction générale de la sécurité intérieure – Patrick Calvar:

 “We are on the verge of a civil war.”

Calvar is actually describing a war that he likely wants. The whole idea of the Evil Islam exercise is to polarize Europe in preparation for increased globalist solutions.

More from Al Jazeera:

The anger of the French population is understandable. But booing a prime minister at the commemoration ceremony for the loss of innocent lives is not the smartest idea.

If the French were booing the prime minister because they understood the manipulations taking place, that would be a positive development.

But no doubt the French in question were booing because they believed the state had not taken a firm enough stance against “radical Islam.”

Unfortunately, it is the state that has created the problem, starting with the forcible absorption of Algeria that later gave rise to the Algerian War of Independence, (1954–62).

This war was a bitter one and many of the “Muslims” in France are from Algeria. They still don’t like the French establishment.

The antipathy that French Algerian Muslims harbor has been used by the mainstream media as evidence that Muslims cannot be absorbed into France.

The “Islam versus the West” meme is filled with lies.

There are as many questions about the Paris attack in France as the one in Nice.

When it comes to the recent horrible attack in Nice, photos and videos seem to show no blood on the truck. Go look on the Internet for yourself.

Every large terror incident in France has had significant questions attached. Just as in the US, evidence is easily presented that these attacks are not what they seem.

It is no doubt difficult to accept that evil forces are manipulating events in Europe and the US so as to cause tension between Islam and the West.

But this is how wars are manufactured. The West did the same sort of thing to Japan. It demonized Japan  and then created a war .

And twice with Germany. In the past years it is has been revealed conclusively that banks and Western industry funded Hitler.

In much of the post-war 20th century period, the CIA and other intel agencies prosecuted Operation Gladio, which manufactured terror incidents purportedly generated by left-wing forces.

HERE, from TruthMove:

The main function of the Gladio-style groups, in the absence of Soviet invasion, seems to have been to discredit left-wing groups and politicians through the use of “the strategy of tension,” including false-flag terrorism. The strategy of tension is a concept for control and manipulation of public opinion through the use of fear, propaganda, agents provacateurs, terrorism, etc. The aim was to instill fear into the populace while framing communist and left-wing political opponents for terrorist atrocities.

Has a neo-Operation Gladio been started?

The CIA doesn’t make announcements. But in the Internet era, it doesn’t have to.

Those running these affiliated intel operations may not like it but the pattern is increasingly obvious. This is surely an ongoing strategy not a series of incidents. How cold-blooded.

Ironically, the Al Jazeera editorial provides us with some pertinent conclusions on how to face the provocations of a neo-Operation Gladio.

Here:

The only option for France today is to stand proud on its secular republican values, multiply the satire that fundamentalists want to shut down, encourage societal inclusion, educate and educate again.

A turn to the extreme right would mean a victory for the terrorists.

However painful it is, the best way to prevail for the French is to stand strong and resist the populist temptations.

The editorial is written by  Remi Piet, an assistant professor of public policy, diplomacy and international political economy at Qatar University.

Two issues with it:

The first thing he does not mention is that the acts of terror are the historical result of French government policies. These policies go back a long ways.

The French bullied Algeria, absorbed Algerian Muslims and then did not give them the opportunity to integrate.

The upshot is a generation of Muslim Algerians that live in France and are bitter about their treatment.

The second problem is that the issue is not one of Islamic terrorism from a historical standpoint so much as the French state being complicit in “false flag” terrorist operations.

Today’s “Evil Islam” meme is being created by forces that want to foster tensions and then worse between Islam and the West.

The French should stand up to their government and demand accountability. But the accountability should involve a confession that “radical Islam” is being advanced by forces affiliated with the government.

The REAL problem, therefore, is not how to defend against radical Islam but how to prevent the French government and broader Western facilities and associates from creating bloody false flags designed to increase tensions.

Conclusion: The French should confront their own government and other European populations should do the same. That goes for America, too. People should demand answers and call on the mainstream media to do its job instead of remaining complicit in an unpublicized but evident neo-Gladio program.

Read More At: TheDailyBell.com

Advertisements

Top Clinton VP Pick Stands With Hillary … and Big Banks


Source: UndergroundReporter.org
Deirdre Fulton
July 22, 2016

Sounding another alarm for progressives wary of the Democratic establishment’s support for Wall Street, the man said to be leading the pack of potential Hillary Clinton running mates—Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine—has just this week sent a clear message to big banks: He’s in their corner.

Kaine, who is reportedly Bill Clinton’s favorite for the vice presidential slot, signed onto two letters on Monday pushing for financial deregulation—letters that show the Clinton camp “how Kaine could be an asset with banking interests on the fundraising trail,” according to David Dayen at The Intercept on Wednesday.

The news should “disqualify” Kaine from the ticket, one prominent progressive group declared Thursday.

The first missive, signed by 16 Democrats and every Republican senator, calls on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to exempt community banks and credit unions from certain regulations.

As Dayen explains:

While this seems benign, tailoring rules that exempt large classes of financial institutions leaves consumers vulnerable to deceptive practices. A rule of this type could allow community banks and credit unions to sell high-risk mortgages or personal loans without the disclosure and ability to pay rules in place across the industry.

The second letter (pdf) deals with even bigger regional institutions, as it is aimed at helping “major firms including Capital One, PNC Bank and U.S. Bank, all of which control hundreds of billions of dollars in assets,” according to the Huffington Post.

Signed by Kaine and three other Democratic senators—Mark Warner (Va.), Gary Peters (Mich.), and Bob Casey (Pa.)—the letter to Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen, Comptroller of the Currency Thomas Curry, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation chair Martin Gruenberg “argues that it is unfair for these large banks to be required to calculate and report their liquidity―a critical measure of risk―on a daily basis,” HuffPo‘s Zach Carter continues.

“This distinction is applied unevenly across regional institutions despite similar risk profiles, simply by virtue of an asset threshold,” the letter reads.

Or, as Carter puts it, translating the senators’ bottom line: “just because they’re big, doesn’t mean they should be regulated more closely.”

But in fact, Dayen points out, “[i]n an interconnected financial system, a large regional bank that gets into trouble has as much chance of creating ripple effects as a mega-bank. It’s unclear why they should be exempted from regulations deemed appropriate for all facets of the financial sector.”

On top of these salvos on behalf of the banking industry, the Huffington Post notes that Kaine did not sign onto a third letter sent Wednesday from 28 senators urging the CFPB to crack down on abusive payday lenders and in turn, protect consumers.

That all this took place while Kaine is presumably being vetted for VP “could show potential financial industry donors that he is willing to serve as an ally on their regulatory issues,” Dayen wrote, especially because Clinton has been pushed to the left by Bernie Sanders on Wall Street.

Given existing concerns around Kaine’s support for the Trans Pacific Partnership and other so-called “free trade” deals, plus his mixed record on reproductive rights and now new proof of his bending to bankers, it’s no wonder RootsAction co-founder and Bernie Sanders delegate Norman Solomon told Common Dreams on Wednesday that choosing the Virginia senator or someone like him “would be a very pronounced middle finger to the 13 million people who voted for Bernie.”

Indeed, in a press statement on Thursday, critics of the Democratic Party’s superdelegate system said Kaine’s position at the top of the VP list provides “a perfect example of why the party needs to create policies and pick candidates who reflect the will of the voters, not the will of elites and special interests that the superdelegate system has come to embody.”

“Superdelegates are the embodiment of a system that is rigged in favor of the powerful at the expense of the powerless,” said Maine state representative Diane Russell, who originated an amendment to abolish superdelegates that will be taken up by the DNC Rules Committee on Saturday, “and there isn’t a more powerful industry in America than the big banks.”

And Democracy for America executive director Charles Chamberlain said in a statement Thursday: “Let’s be really clear: It should be disqualifying for any potential Democratic vice presidential candidate to be part of a lobbyist-driven effort to help banks dodge consumer protection standards and regulations designed to prevent banks from destroying our economy.”

“Our presidential ticket cannot beat the billionaire bigot by simply being not-Donald Trump,” he added. “To win in November, our ticket needs to have an unquestionably strong record in the fight against income inequality, one of the defining issues of the 2016 election.”

Read More At: UndergroundReporter.org
_________________________________________________________________


This article (Top Clinton VP Pick Stands With Hillary … and Big Banks) by Deirdre Fulton originally appeared on CommonDreams.org and is licensed Creative Commons. Image credit: Flickr/DonkeyHotey

Those Bankster Hacks: A Strange Story About Hacking The FED

THOSE BANKSTER HACKS: A STRANGE STORY ABOUT HACKING THE FED

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
June 6, 2016

This very important story was shared by Ms. KM, and it’s so significant I simply have to blog about it, especially given the previous weeks’ stories about various banks being hacked. Only this one is far more serious:

“Anonymous” Hacks Federal Reserve; Grabs Stock Ownership files!

Now the title here says it all: the hacking group Anonymous has allegedly hacked not only the Federal Reserve, but stolen files indicating which corporations the US Fed has purchased:

The hacker group known as “Anonymous” has announced it successfully penetrated multiple systems within the federal reserve bank, and successfully downloaded two crucial files: One showing an account number and the stocks owned by that account number, the other showing an account number and the name of the owner of that account. Without having BOTH files, no one could ever tell who owned what.  Anonymous claims they stole BOTH files!

Anonymous says the federal reserve bank owns more than fifty percent of the stock in quite a few major US Corporations!  If the fed had not purchased these vast quantities of stocks (Think Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) and the S&P 500) both markets would have crashed long ago!

Even worse, the group claims that the US federal reserve also purchased stocks in foreign companies and foreign banks in such vast quantities as to prop-up European and Asian markets!!!!

Now there’s an implication here that is also equally disturbing. Since the Federal Reserve is a privately owned stock corporation, the actual owners of its stock are also not well known, though it has been more or less an accepted theory in the alternative research community that the major banking families have been the major owners ot the Fed’s own stock since its founding, but there’s never been a real historical history of who owned how much, nor how these blocks of stock might have changed over time. The usual suspects are, of course, the Morgan interests, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Warburgs, Schiffs, and so on. But what was true in 1913 may not be true now.

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com

_________________________________________________________________

Profile photo of Joseph P. Farrell
Joseph P. Farrell has a doctorate in patristics from the University of Oxford, and pursues research in physics, alternative history and science, and “strange stuff”. His book The Giza DeathStar, for which the Giza Community is named, was published in the spring of 2002, and was his first venture into “alternative history and science”.

5 Truths About the Economy the MSM Has Been Forced to Admit

The truth is a beach ball. You can spin it, distort it, ignore it, or push it under the water. But it has a way of popping back up.

Source: TheInternationalForecaster
James Corbett
April 5, 2016

The truth is a beach ball. You can spin it, distort it, try to knock it out of the way or shove it under the water but it will always pop back up. That’s why the talking heads of the MSM generally just try to ignore it. But it’s there. It persists. It makes itself known.

Today let’s look at five recent examples of how the MSM had to admit the truth about this phoney-baloney fantasyland economy.

1) The Fed caused 93% of the rise in stocks since Lehman

The extraordinary 7 year bull run in the Dow and S&P (complete with the best quarterly comeback since 1933) is a central bank created bubble that rests on no actual economic fundamentals.

Don’t feign shock. I know you already know this, if for no other reason than that I have talked about it over and over and over since the very beginning of the Lehman crisis.

In fact, as I noted in a previous article:

This point is not even controversial. It has been the universal consensus of institutions ranging from the Bank for International Settlements to the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum, and from OECD officials to former Fed Governors and even Alan “Bubbles” Greenspan himself.

In fact, analyst after analyst and pundit after pundit–including the most mainstream of mainstream publications–have been sounding the alarm on the stock market bubble for much of the past year.

Well, add one more admission to that list. And this time it’s quantified. Yahoo Finance just published an article admitting that fully 93% of the gains in the stock market during this bull run are directly attributable to the Fed’s interventions in the market.

Now to be fair, there is no modern era in which the markets have not been driven by hope and change of some sort or another. In fact, the economist behind this latest analysis–Brian Barnier of FedDashboard.com–has identified the main drivers of equity market growth going back to 1950, and none of those drivers is “increased productivity” or “growing economic activity.”

Still, that the Fed has driven more than 9/10ths of the recent stock growth is a phenomenal thing for the MSM to so blithely admit. They are the ones, after all, who generally tend to focus on the stock indexes as a bellweather of the economy. So it only stands to reason that if the stock bubble of the last decade has all been a central bank generated mirage, then the economic “recovery” itself is a mirage, right?

“But it’s not just equities!” the savvy reader will say. “What about the commodities rally?”

Funny you should mention that, actually, because the MSM also just admitted that…

2) The commodities rally is based on nothing and will soon collapse

Everyone knows that oil prices began plunging in 2014 and have only recently pulled out of the tailspin. But the oil rout was only one part of a greater commodity rout that has happened in lockstep with the global slowdown in trade in recent years. This great commodity plunge has taken its toll on everything from potash to copper to iron ore to mining stocks to banks to the economies of resource-exporting nations like Australia, Canada and Brazil.

Continue Reading At: TheInternationalForecaster.com

 

The War On Humanity & The Latest Get-Rich Scheme In Amairikuhn…

FactsTruthLies
GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
February 21, 2016

I had to read this one twice, and with each reading, my nausea, and my anger and frustration, increased. This one was shared by Mr. S.D.H., and it will probably anger you too, and, to put the record straight for those of you not in the USSA, what Goldman Sachs does here will soon  be coming to a school near you. In fact, I’ve heard from frustrated teachers in the United Kingdom and Australia, and it seems the rot is spreading everywhere. But anyway, read about this latest scam here.

US Department of Education Endorses “Pay for Success” Bonds for Pre-K Special Education

Now, in case you missed the scam – and I rather doubt you did – here it is, one more time:

What is “pay for success” and what are “social impact bonds?” As blogger Fred Klonsky explains:

Pay for Success is a social impact bond (SIB) that pays Wall Street investors like Goldman Sachs a bounty for every child that does not receive special education support.

Pay for Success is nothing less than a push-out program that then pays the bond investor a bonus for every child that is pushed out of special ed services.

This left me breathless, and almost at a loss for words.

That’s right: you can now invest in educational deprivation for special needs students, and the more that get pushed out of the “system,” the more “successful” it is, and the more money you make. This is not capitalism folks. This is not the manufacture of a product nor the production of a needed service. This is simply the monetization of inhumanity. It is ultimately, if one examines the premise carefully, the trafficking in humanity itself, and of a most barbarous kind. This is not the betterment of society.

Continue Reading at: GizaDeathStar.com