Quote Of The Day – Learn | Unlearn | Relearn

Thx Lili for sharing this.

ALiLiRead.jpg

Advertisements

Farmers Can Receive Grants to Move to Organic Farming

Transition will ditch GMOs and toxic chemicals
money farmer crops 735 270

Source: NaturalSociety.com
Christina Sarich
February 16, 2016

Two Midwestern states in the U.S. are offering farmers three years of support to move to organic crop production. Farmers would ditch GMOs along with their toxic pesticides and herbicides. The aim is to boost acreage of organically-grown crops in the U.S. once the upper Midwest is well on its way to sustainable farming.

North Dakota and Minnesota have both started grant programs. Minnesota led the way in 2013 and North Dakota began its program this year. The grants, ranging from $750 to $1000, help farmers to transition to organic crops. The money can be used for everything from soil testing to education on how to grow food in a sustainable way.

The new programs disallow using chemicals. Farmers who are switching from mainstream to organic farming practices will learn how to grow crops without using chemicals.

Continue Reading At: NaturalSociety.com

Scalia Murdered? – Sealed His Fake 4 Days Before His Death?

QuestionEverything
Source: NoMoreFakeNews.com
Jon Rappoport
February 17, 2016

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

Four days before he died, Supreme Court Justice Scalia voted to stall Obama’s plan to force drastic climate-change rules on the American economy. The vote was 5-4.

With Scalia now gone, the vote would be 4-4.

With a new Obama Supreme Court appointee, if Obama could ram his choice through, the vote would be 5-4 in the President’s favor. Ditto, if the next President shares Obama’s position. And the climate-change agenda would roll ahead.

We’re not talking about small climate-change rules. We’re talking about the Big Ones.

And note: such rules could very well dovetail with the Brave New World spelled out in the upcoming TPP (the Trans-Pacific Partnership).

It’s a wedge formation, a squeeze play, a pincer movement featuring new EPA climate-change regulations on one side, and new draconian possibilities embedded in the TPP.

If Scalia was murdered, the above agenda was sufficient reason, because the climate agenda has the force to transform life on the planet.

If Scalia’s murder were a movie, he would have been told, as a warning: “You have no idea how big this thing is; you really don’t understand the forces you’re messing with.”

Of course, most Americans don’t believe a political murder along this line could happen in real life. They can only accept it in a movie, where it makes perfect sense. That tells you something about the schizoid nature of the public mind.

Adrenaline-driven in front of a screen; tranquilized and programmed to be passive and accepting of recognized authority, otherwise.

“Don’t be silly. Scalia, murdered, and murdered for that reason? It couldn’t happen. That’s so…barbaric. We’re civilized.” That opinion and $6 will get you a rainbow smoothie.

Obama’s climate-change plan uses the EPA to act out international agreements signed at the recent Paris summit. But in order to, yes, scam these agreements into force in the US, the EPA has to stretch and bend and distort already-existing US law. And it has done so.

However, a number of states have sued to stop the EPA, which wants to make all states cut CO2 emissions from electrical power production by 32% in the next 15 years. Aimed mainly at coal-burning plants, these regulations would create deep reductions in the overall US energy supply and output—a primary mission of the economy-wrecking Rockefeller Globalists.

The US Supreme Court, four days before Scalia’s death, with his vote, declared a narrow 5-4 halt to the Obama plan, pending a lower-court decision on the issue. The 5-4 vote didn’t knock out the plan, but it stalled it. And if Scalia had stayed alive, his vote going forward on the Obama plan could have remained crucial.

Continue Reading At: JonRappoport.wordpress.com

Uranium Contaminates Drinking Water – Sodium Bicarbonate Clears the Kidneys and Soil of Uranium

Uranium Contaminates Drinking Water – Sodium Bicarbonate Clears the Kidneys and Soil of Uranium

Source: GreenMedInfo.com
Dr. Mark Sircus
January 22, 2016

In the western United States notices are springing upUranium, the notices warn, tests at levels considered unsafe by federal and state standards.  The notices say you can drink the water — but if you drink the water over a period of time, you can get cancer. USGS researchers recently sampled 170 domestic water wells in the San Joaquin Valley, and found 20 to 25 percent bore uranium at levels that broke federal and state limits.

Uranium, the stuff of nuclear fuel for power plants and atom bombs, increasingly is showing in drinking water systems in major farming regions of the U.S. West. Naturally, authorities are doing little to inform the public at large of the growing risk.

Government authorities say long-term exposure to uranium can damage kidneys and raise cancer risks as well as provoke other health problems. Once the uranium is solubilized in the blood, the kidney will excrete some of it in urine. Uranium not excreted distributes to bone and soft tissue, including the kidney, liver, lung, fat, muscle, and then, to some extent, to all other organs. Though the main reservoir is the skeleton, the target organ is the kidney, where functional changes are observed. Research teams at Tufts and the University of New Mexico also link long-term exposure to signs of reproductive and genetic damage.

In one swath of farmland in California, roughly 250 miles long and encompassing major cities, up to one in 10 public water systems have raw drinking water with uranium levels that exceed federal and state safety standards, the U.S. Geological Survey has found. It is interesting to note that at Livermore Labs they have license to explode a certain amount of depleted uranium above ground each year.

Nearly 2 million people in California’s Central Valley and in the U.S. Midwest live within a half-mile of groundwater containing uranium over the safety standards, University of Nebraska researchers said in a study published in September. Moreover, guess what? Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab detonates about 200 radioactive “dirty bombs” a year, creating deadly and radioactive uranium gas in the heavily populated San Francisco Bay and Monterey Bay Areas of California. About 10 million people live and work within the large metropolitan areas.

Continue Reading At: GreenMedInfo.com

The Transhumanist Scrapbook – Gender Inclusiveness – Banning

QuestionEverything

Source: GizaDeathStar.com
Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
February 17, 2016

Most readers here know that I view most of modern culture as being driven by a mad ultra-left, ultra-radical progressivist agenda that is waging war on any manifestation of our humanity, be it our masculinity, femininity, the old, the young, the unborn, the disabled, a child’s innocence or an elderly person’s experience and wisdom, and that this war against the human extends to language itself. The “gender inclusive” fad here is, to my mind anyway, one of the most egregious examples, as the three letters “Man” has to be banned, as if somehow, magically, they imply the exclusion of women. We’ve all seen how “mankind” disappeared, and ‘humankind” entered the vocabulary. Even the garish expression “s/he” is no longer gender neutral enough for some people, and perish the thought that one use “he” or “she” as an old rhetorical pars pro toto pronoun! Sexuality has been reduced to “gender”; we no longer see “sex, male or female” on forms, we see “gender”, doubtless with “None of the above” being one of the checkable boxes soon to appear. Now some thought police want to banish “husband” and “wife”:

What is at stake here, I submit, is not only an effort to make free speech and academic freedom a thing of the past – and these students should rigorously insist on their right to use what words and pronouns they want to use, or insist on “balancing courses” that require older forms of diction in the name of “fairness” – the real goal is to cut us off from the traditions of our culture, and hence, from our culture itself. The real goal is the free editing of texts by self-appointed thought police and culture police. It’s about the uglification of culture, and hence, about more dehumanization.  [Bold and underline emphasis added]

Continue Reading At: GizaDeathStar.com