Policing Agencies Are Trawling Our Websites in an Effort to Remove the Truth

Policing Agencies Are Trawling Our Websites in an Effort to Remove the Truth
Source: GreenMedInfo.com
Christina England, BA Hons
May 9, 2017

Over the years, a growing number of organizations, companies, and websites have found themselves being targeted by either the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) or their local Trading Standards authority, for daring to promote the health benefits of natural products on their website.

In 2014, a journalist and author, Ms. Anna Victoria Rogers, found herself a target of this ‘policing agency’ when she began advertising a range of health products on Miss Eco Glam, her website promoting a healthy lifestyle.

Policing Agencies Are Trawling Our Websites in an Effort to Remove the Truth

Anna Victoria Rogers of Miss Eco Glam.

She told GreenMedInfo that her problems began when she opened an online shop, sparking a series of complaints by the Advertising Standards Agency. She stated that:

In 2013, I received a series of emails from the ASA, stating that it had been brought to their attention that I was making false claims about a collagen product that I was selling on my website. This led to further emails a few years later, regarding a zeolite product, found to remove heavy metals and toxins.

Each time it was the same deal and I was ordered to take down vital information, leaving only the product name, ingredients and price with a purchase link. Whereas, previously, I had written information on the health benefits and the science behind the products, so people could see what it could help them with.

Now of course, as many of us are aware, we cannot state what natural products can do – even if we quote the science and studies that the companies had used themselves.

Ms. Rogers continued:

Despite the fact that zeolite was used in over 300 Pub Med studies, according to the ASA, I wasn’t even allowed to state this on my website and instead they asked me to prove the claims myself! I replied that surely it was up to them to get the information from the manufacturer and not me, as I was just offering the product for sale on my website. However, they insisted that I had to prove it myself!

What they were asking me to do was a huge undertaking which resulted in me closing down the shop altogether.” 

Ms. Rogers concluded that the whole experience had left her feeling extremely disillusioned, and told us that:

I’m lucky because my shop was relatively small and I didn’t rely on it for my income but I know that these strict regulations can destroy small businesses because by removing so much information affects SEO and websites can lose a lot of traffic. I feel sad for the people that I can no longer help.

At the time, I also received emails from my local council who had received my information from the ASA, to basically say they were aware of the case and that if I didn’t do as I was told they would make me go to court.

What goes on is quite ridiculous, government money cracking down on harmless products that do help people. But there is an agenda going on under the name of Codex Alimentarius. I think the ASA are in cahoots with other organizations, such as Sense about Science, who go after people in the natural health movement. They are a pro-GMO and pharma group. They are not pro-health and have publicly attacked many natural health experts and homeopathy.

Sure, I do know that there have been cases of things being sold on the internet that are dangerous and have harmed people, but the two products I sold (Visi Probita and Pure Body by Touchstone Essentials) have thousands of happy customers who swear by the benefits and I personally took both whilst pregnant!

Ms. Rogers believed that many of the emails that she had received were extremely intimidating and forwarded them to GreenMedInfo, giving us permission to include their content.

One of these emails stated:

From: Sally Ramsden
Sent: 25/03/2014 11:22
To: ‘anna————‘
Subject: RE: Advertising Standards Authority Investigation A14-257479/SR

Dear Anna

Thank you for your e-mail.

Im sorry I missed your call last week and thank you for pointing out that my voicemail message was out of date.

Having been unable to reach you yesterday, I wanted to ensure you have a quick response to your query.  Firstly, we welcome your cooperation in removing the claims from your Facebook advertising.  Regarding the website, if you are prepared to make changes to your advertising with a view to resolving the complaint informally, you would need to provide a written assurance that the challenged claims, and other claims that are likely to have a similar meaning to consumers, will be removed.

To expand on that (and this also applies to advertising more generally), health claims (those that suggest or imply that a relationship exists between a food category, a food or one of its constituents and health) cannot be used unless you can demonstrate that they are authorised on the EU Register.  Appearance or other efficacy claims, including those in testimonials, must not be made unless you can support them with a high level of documentary evidence (for example, peer-reviewed controlled clinical trials).  Similarly, you must hold a high level of documentary evidence to demonstrate that effects seen in before and after photos are genuine.

Therefore, we would be happy to discuss an informal resolution if you are prepared to provide an assurance that your advertising will be amended to remove health, appearance and other efficacy claims (including those in testimonials) as well as before and after pictures.  If you are not in a position to demonstrate that the claims meet the requirements set out above, we would recommend the product is advertised on an ‘availability only’ basis (whereby no direct or implies claims are made about efficacy).

If you do not wish to change your advertising as described, or if you would otherwise prefer to defend the claims, please instead send your comments on the complaint and the evidence you hold in support of the claims.  We look forward to hearing how you wish to proceed by 1 April.
While we must first tackle the complaints we have received, it might reassure you to know that CAP, our sister organisation, has a team that can provide advice on the specifics of your proposed future advertising, to help you avoid ASA investigations in future.  We will provide their details once the case has been closed.

I hope this helps explain our position.

Kind regards

Sally Ramsden
Senior Investigations Executive
Direct line 020 7492 2179
Advertising Standards Authority
Mid City Place, 71 High Holborn
London WC1V 6QT
Telephone 020 7492 2222
Follow us on twitter: @ASA_UK
Legal, decent, honest and truthful

Another email stated:

On 3 Apr 2014, at 09:52, Sally Ramsden <SallyR@ASA.Org.UK> wrote:

Dear Anna

Thank you for your email.

Having reviewed your website, the changes go some way to addressing the complaint however further changes are needed in order to ensure compliance and to therefore close the file.  I have outlined the additional changes that should be made below:

The ASA continued with a long list of changes that they required Ms. Rogers to change and stated that:

You must be in a position to support the objective claims such as those about the importance of protein and collagen with evidence and they should not appear in conjunction with any claims that state or imply efficacy.

In addition, we should make clear that while we consider you responsible only for the content of marketing material under your control, we would not encourage the use of links to other sites that are likely to include non-compliant content (i.e., those to testimonials and to what health professionals say).

If you could get back to me by 8 April to confirm that the additional changes outlined against the bullet points will be made, we ought to then be in a position to close our file.

Kind regards
Sally Ramsden

It appeared that the ASA were only satisfied when Ms. Rogers decided to close her shop down. She explained that she felt that she could no longer cope with the stress and the continual attacks on her good name.

It is Not Only the Small Websites That Are Under Attack

Unfortunately, from the information that we have received, it appears that these aggressive techniques are being used on a growing number of online distributors advertising alternative health products.

A few months ago, Mr. Rex Garratt, the Director and UK Distributor for Acilis, the silica-rich mineral water by Spritzer, was approached by Trading Standards and asked to remove a number of proven ‘health claims from their website.

In a letter to GreenMedInfo, Mr. Garratt explained that…

Continue Reading At: GreenMedInfo.com

Published by


Zy Marquiez is an avid book reviewer, an open-minded skeptic, yogi, and freelance writer who regularly studies subjects such as: Consciousness, Education, Creativity, The Individual, Ancient History & Ancient Civilizations, Forbidden Archaeology, Big Pharma, Alternative Health, Space, Geoengineering, Social Engineering, Propaganda, and much more. His own personal blog is BreakawayConsciousnessBlog.wordpress.com where his personal work is shared, while TheBreakaway.wordpress.com serves as a media portal which mirrors vital information usually ignored by mainstream press, but still highly crucial to our individual understanding of various facets of the world. My work can also be found on https://steemit.com/@zyphrex.

2 thoughts on “Policing Agencies Are Trawling Our Websites in an Effort to Remove the Truth”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s