SB277: Facing Down Big Pharma Medical Tyranny In California & Elsewhere

Zy Marquiez
June 11, 2016

In California, the bill SB277 – that forces parents to vaccinate children – takes effect on July 1 of this year, nigh 3 weeks away.  That is making many parents extremely nervous for many reasons.

First and foremost, as detailed in Thimerosal – Let The Science Speak by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., vaccinations containing Thimerosal are fraught with issues.   Not only is Thimerosal a known neurotoxin, but there is also ample evidence that it is extremely dangerous even at low doses.  This particular book showcases hundreds data points outlining the dangers of vaccinations.

Furthermore, vaccinations have many more noxious compounds than just Thimerosal.  Some of these include but are not limited too: Aluminum, which is another known neurotoxin; polysorbate 80, which may cause adverse reproductive issues; formaldehyde, which is a known carcinogen, and many more.    That creates a cocktail of potentially harmful chemicals that could cause extreme harm to those subjected to it.

Secondly, even if vaccines were safe, nobody should be forced to vaccinate.  That’s medical tyranny in all its disdainful glory.

Forcing vaccinations only sets the precedent for forcing people to take other medical procedures without their consent.  Last time we checked, America was a free country, is it not?  Why are people trying to force others to do anything?

Third, if vaccinations are so safe, why was the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act [NCVIA] passed?

What is the NCVIA?  Excellent question.  It’s a law that was passed which protects Big Pharma from being liable for damages arising from vaccine-related injury or death associated with vaccinations.  As related with many doctors/reserachers, this act took place because the pharmaceutical companies were facing so many lawsuits that they couldn’t move forward without government protection.

But, wait a minute…

If vaccines are so safe, then why would there be any law protecting pharmaceutical companies from lawsuits.  Vaccines are safe, are they not?  That’s what the establishment would LIKE people to believe.

Transitioning to the video below, the documentary VAXXED producer Del Bigtree, and two other people detail the strategy that parents should take fighting the tyrannical and morally-bankrupt medical system in California.

These individuals have requested lawyers create a form to be used for parents facing mandatory vaccinations via SB277.

As detailed in the video:

“Because neither doctors nor vaccine manufacturers are liable for any damage caused by vaccinating a child, this form requests that the doctor take responsibility for any vaccine damage that may occur. Since the doctor insists (along with the CDC, the FDA, and the drug companies) that these mandatory vaccines are safe, (s)he should be willing to take responsibility for any damage resulting to your child. If the doctor refuses, you can ask why. If she or he says it’s because they don’t want to be liable for damage, they are admitting the vaccines are not safe. You can then ask them to sign a medical exemption for the vaccines. Andy, Polly, and Del ask that you film this exchange with your doctor and share it with Vaxxed. If your doctor refuses to either sign the document of responsibility or a medical exemption, please let them know at… and they will add this doctor to an upcoming list on the website for other parents to refer to. In this video they read out the form, which will soon be on the Vaxxed website.”

To paraphrase Del Bigtree, the above information of doctors refusing the vaccinate will be used to build a database of pediatricians/doctors that will not sign the release form  and refuse to take personal responsibility for the safety of the vaccine that they will be administering to children.  There in, the data of will be collated and taken to a senator to show all of the pediatricians/doctors that refuse to stand by the safety of vaccinations.

How can SB277 be forced on the people when doctors themselves will not stand by it with their own credibility?

If vaccines are perfectly safe, doctors shouldn’t have to worry about any lawsuits, injuries and the like.

Vaccines are either safe, or they are not.  There is no in between.

Since vaccines are not perfectly safe, which ample evidence has showcased, then SB277 is will only compromise the health of children all over the state.

Its time individuals stand up to their rights, or see them vanish before their eyes.

If SB277’s tyrannical nature is allowed to continue, not only will this set an extremely dangerous/volatile precedent for future medical issues, but it will also mean that the continual removal of our god-given rights are reaching unheard of levels.

We either have medical freedoms, or we don’t.

America is either a Free country, or it isn’t.

Which one is it?


A personal thank you goes out to this blogger for letting me know of this particular video.

Published by


Zy Marquiez is an avid book reviewer, an open-minded skeptic, yogi, and freelance writer who regularly studies subjects such as: Consciousness, Education, Creativity, The Individual, Ancient History & Ancient Civilizations, Forbidden Archaeology, Big Pharma, Alternative Health, Space, Geoengineering, Social Engineering, Propaganda, and much more. His own personal blog is where his personal work is shared, while serves as a media portal which mirrors vital information usually ignored by mainstream press, but still highly crucial to our individual understanding of various facets of the world. My work can also be found on

One thought on “SB277: Facing Down Big Pharma Medical Tyranny In California & Elsewhere”

  1. Unfortunately, It would seem that people have “consented” to such statutes both via the passage, by their representatives of and their silent consent to “The Affordable Health Care Act” among others of long list of actions and inactions set in place or ignored by those who we continue to set in place as our “voices.”

    Yes, 42 USC Ch. 157 AKA “The Affordable Health Care Act” (Title 42 deals with public health, social welfare, and civil rights) was the “camel’s nose under the tent” that will now serve to further expand the provisions of 42 USC 1981 in part to wit: “[S]hall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.” And, in case you didn’t notice, is one of your “civil rights” not to be confused with inherent or natural rights, but rather are “statutory rights” that flow from government to you.

    Do you know what an “exaction” is? Black’s Law Dictionary says, “The wrongful act of an officer or other person in compelling payment of a fee or reward for his services, under color of his official authority, where no payment Is due. Between ‘extortion’ and ‘exaction’ there is this difference: that in the former case the officer extorts more than his due, when something is due to him; in the latter, he exacts what is not his due, when there is nothing due to him.” Yes, Federal Statute says that’s legal and since 1870, no one has stepped up to challenge it.

    So, here we are with little to no improvement essentially since the Civil War, and each tyrannical upswing of the military government that was set in place merely elicits a slight increase in volume of the cricket song emitting from the people. And, what compounds it all is the fact that very few will dare come to grips with this reality, but rather keep their heads down in the hope that they will go unnoticed by their masters.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s