Dr. Joseph P. Farrell
May 28, 2016
There’s more news about the hacking group Anonymous and its hacking exploits, or is there? Well, if you’re watching the lamestream news, not really, at least, not according to these two articles that many of you shared:
We blogged this story previously but now there appears to be a new wrinkle to ponder if you read these two articles closely, a wrinkle having to do with our high octane speculation of the day. But first, a caveat: we are assuming for the sake of argument that these two articles – which are more or less the same – are in fact true. But there is equally the possibility that they may not be, or at least, may contain a degree of “disinformation.” This would dovetail quite nicely with the view of some that Anonymous may not be the “independent, altruistic” group that some say it is, but rather, a global organization with big backers behind it. Some have been of the opinion that it represents a cut-out for Chinese and/or Russian cyber warfare activity against the West, and given the West’s own economic warfare on Russia, a response in some form is to be expected. “Two can play the covert operations game”. Again, completeness also demands that one entertain the possibility that the group may even be the dialectical catspaw for the banksters themselves, a way of demonstrating the vulnerability of current digital financial systems to create a climate of opinion to emplace something draconian.